Silver M, Wilkerson L A
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Acad Med. 1991 May;66(5):298-300. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199105000-00017.
With the increased interest in problem-based, small-group learning in medical education, a debate has arisen about whether the tutor should be an expert in the subject under discussion. This 1988 study at Harvard Medical School demonstrates that tutors' expertise has important effects on the process of discussion in a problem-based tutorial. In comparing discussions of subjects in which the tutors described themselves as expert with those in which they did not, the authors found that the tutors with expertise tended to take a more directive role in tutorials: they spoke more often and for longer periods, provided more direct answers to the students' questions, and suggested more of the topics for discussion. Tutor-to-student exchanges predominated, with less student-to-student discussion. These effects endanger an important goal of problem-based learning: the development of students' skills in active, self-directed learning.
随着医学教育中对基于问题的小组学习兴趣的增加,关于导师是否应该是所讨论主题的专家引发了一场争论。1988年在哈佛医学院进行的这项研究表明,导师的专业知识对基于问题的辅导讨论过程有重要影响。在比较导师自认为是专家的主题讨论和他们不认为是专家的主题讨论时,作者发现有专业知识的导师在辅导中倾向于扮演更具指导性的角色:他们发言更频繁、时间更长,对学生的问题提供更直接的答案,并提出更多讨论话题。师生交流占主导,学生之间的讨论较少。这些影响危及基于问题学习的一个重要目标:培养学生主动、自主学习的技能。