Wisconsin Psychiatric Institute and Clinics, Departments of Psychology and Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Neuroimage. 2010 Jul 15;51(4):1319-33. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.037. Epub 2010 Mar 18.
Recent years have seen an explosion of interest in using neural oscillations to characterize the mechanisms supporting cognition and emotion. Oftentimes, oscillatory activity is indexed by mean power density in predefined frequency bands. Some investigators use broad bands originally defined by prominent surface features of the spectrum. Others rely on narrower bands originally defined by spectral factor analysis (SFA). Presently, the robustness and sensitivity of these competing band definitions remains unclear. Here, a Monte Carlo-based SFA strategy was used to decompose the tonic ("resting" or "spontaneous") electroencephalogram (EEG) into five bands: delta (1-5Hz), alpha-low (6-9Hz), alpha-high (10-11Hz), beta (12-19Hz), and gamma (>21Hz). This pattern was consistent across SFA methods, artifact correction/rejection procedures, scalp regions, and samples. Subsequent analyses revealed that SFA failed to deliver enhanced sensitivity; narrow alpha sub-bands proved no more sensitive than the classical broadband to individual differences in temperament or mean differences in task-induced activation. Other analyses suggested that residual ocular and muscular artifact was the dominant source of activity during quiescence in the delta and gamma bands. This was observed following threshold-based artifact rejection or independent component analysis (ICA)-based artifact correction, indicating that such procedures do not necessarily confer adequate protection. Collectively, these findings highlight the limitations of several commonly used EEG procedures and underscore the necessity of routinely performing exploratory data analyses, particularly data visualization, prior to hypothesis testing. They also suggest the potential benefits of using techniques other than SFA for interrogating high-dimensional EEG datasets in the frequency or time-frequency (event-related spectral perturbation, event-related synchronization/desynchronization) domains.
近年来,人们对利用神经振荡来刻画支持认知和情感的机制产生了浓厚的兴趣。通常,振荡活动通过预定义频带中的平均功率密度来进行索引。一些研究人员使用最初由频谱显著表面特征定义的宽频带。另一些人则依赖于最初由谱因子分析(SFA)定义的窄频带。目前,这些竞争频带定义的稳健性和敏感性尚不清楚。在这里,使用基于蒙特卡罗的 SFA 策略将静息态脑电图(EEG)分解为五个频带:δ(1-5Hz)、α-低(6-9Hz)、α-高(10-11Hz)、β(12-19Hz)和γ(>21Hz)。这种模式在 SFA 方法、伪影校正/拒绝程序、头皮区域和样本中都是一致的。随后的分析表明,SFA 并不能提高敏感性;窄的α子带在个体差异的气质或任务诱发激活的平均差异方面并不比经典的宽带更敏感。其他分析表明,在 delta 和 gamma 频带中,静息时的活动主要来源于残留的眼动和肌肉伪影。这在基于阈值的伪影拒绝或基于独立成分分析(ICA)的伪影校正后观察到,表明这些程序并不一定能提供充分的保护。总的来说,这些发现强调了几种常用 EEG 方法的局限性,并强调了在进行假设检验之前,进行探索性数据分析(特别是数据可视化)的必要性。它们还表明,在频域或时频域(事件相关谱扰动、事件相关同步/去同步)中使用除 SFA 以外的技术来探测高维 EEG 数据集可能具有潜在的优势。