Health System Governance and Service Delivery, World Health Organization, avenue Appia 20, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland.
Bull World Health Organ. 2009 Dec;87(12):930-9. doi: 10.2471/BLT.08.058677. Epub 2009 Aug 25.
To examine how health aid is spent and channelled, including the distribution of resources across countries and between subsectors. Our aim was to complement the many qualitative critiques of health aid with a quantitative review and to provide insights on the level of development assistance available to recipient countries to address their health and health development needs.
We carried out a quantitative analysis of data from the Aggregate Aid Statistics and Creditor Reporting System databases of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, which are the most reliable sources of data on official development assistance (ODA) for health from all traditional bilateral and multilateral sources and from partnerships such as the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria.
The analysis shows that while health ODA is rising and capturing a larger share of total ODA, there are significant imbalances in the allocation of health aid which run counter to internationally recognized principles of "effective aid". Countries with comparable levels of poverty and health need receive remarkably different levels of aid. Funding for Millennium Development Goal 6 (combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases) accounts for much of the recent increase in health ODA, while many other health priorities remain insufficiently funded. Aid is highly fragmented at country level, which entails high transaction costs, divergence from national policies and lack of coherence between development partners.
Although political momentum towards aid effectiveness is increasing at global level, some very real aid management challenges remain at country level. Continued monitoring is therefore necessary, and we recommend that a review of the type presented here be repeated every 3 years.
审查卫生援助的支出和流向,包括资源在国家间和各子部门间的分配情况。我们的目的是用定量审查来补充对卫生援助的许多定性批评,并就向受援国提供的发展援助水平提供一些见解,以满足这些国家的卫生和卫生发展需求。
我们对经济合作与发展组织的汇总援助统计和债权国报告系统数据库中的数据进行了定量分析,这些数据库是所有传统双边和多边来源以及全球抗击艾滋病、结核病和疟疾基金等伙伴关系提供的卫生官方发展援助(ODA)最可靠的数据来源。
分析表明,虽然卫生 ODA 呈上升趋势,在总 ODA 中所占份额越来越大,但卫生援助的分配存在严重失衡,不符合“有效援助”的国际公认原则。贫困程度和卫生需求相当的国家获得的援助水平却截然不同。千年发展目标 6(防治艾滋病毒/艾滋病、疟疾和其他疾病)的资金占卫生 ODA 最近增长的大部分,而许多其他卫生重点仍未得到充分供资。援助在国家一级高度分散,这需要很高的交易成本,偏离国家政策,发展伙伴之间缺乏一致性。
尽管全球一级援助实效的政治势头正在增强,但国家一级仍存在一些非常现实的援助管理挑战。因此,有必要继续进行监测,我们建议每 3 年重复进行一次此处提出的这种审查。