• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A randomized controlled trial comparing motivational interviewing in education to structured diabetes education in teens with type 1 diabetes.一项比较教育中动机性访谈与 1 型糖尿病青少年结构化糖尿病教育的随机对照试验。
Diabetes Care. 2010 Aug;33(8):1741-3. doi: 10.2337/dc10-0019. Epub 2010 May 18.
2
A multicenter randomized controlled trial of motivational interviewing in teenagers with diabetes.一项针对青少年糖尿病患者的动机性访谈多中心随机对照试验。
Diabetes Care. 2007 Jun;30(6):1390-5. doi: 10.2337/dc06-2260. Epub 2007 Mar 10.
3
Motivational Interviewing and Glycemic Control in Adolescents With Poorly Controlled Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.动机性访谈对血糖控制不佳的青少年 1 型糖尿病患者的影响:一项随机对照初步试验。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Mar 12;12:639507. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.639507. eCollection 2021.
4
The effect of motivational interviewing on glycaemic control and perceived competence of diabetes self-management in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus after attending a group education programme: a randomised controlled trial.参加团体教育计划后,动机性访谈对 1 型和 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制和自我管理能力的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Diabetologia. 2011 Jul;54(7):1620-9. doi: 10.1007/s00125-011-2120-x. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
5
Structured, intensive education maximising engagement, motivation and long-term change for children and young people with diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluation - the CASCADE study.结构化、强化教育最大限度地提高糖尿病患儿和青少年的参与度、积极性和长期改变:一项具有整体过程和经济评估的群组随机对照试验 - CASCADE 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Mar;18(20):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta18200.
6
Efficacy and implementation of an Internet psychoeducational program for teens with type 1 diabetes.一项针对1型糖尿病青少年的互联网心理教育项目的效果与实施情况
Pediatr Diabetes. 2016 Dec;17(8):567-575. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12338. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
7
Psychological interventions to improve self-management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.心理干预对改善 1 型和 2 型糖尿病自我管理的效果:系统综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(28):1-232. doi: 10.3310/hta24280.
8
A randomised controlled trial of cognitive behaviour therapy and motivational interviewing for people with Type 1 diabetes mellitus with persistent sub-optimal glycaemic control: a Diabetes and Psychological Therapies (ADaPT) study.一项针对血糖控制持续不佳的 1 型糖尿病患者的认知行为疗法和动机访谈的随机对照试验:一项糖尿病和心理治疗(ADaPT)研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(22):1-101, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta14220.
9
A pilot study of motivational interviewing in adolescents with diabetes.一项针对青少年糖尿病患者的动机性访谈试点研究。
Arch Dis Child. 2003 Aug;88(8):680-3. doi: 10.1136/adc.88.8.680.
10
Long-term maintenance of treatment outcomes: diabetes personal trainer intervention for youth with type 1 diabetes.治疗效果的长期维持:针对1型糖尿病青少年的糖尿病私人教练干预
Diabetes Care. 2009 May;32(5):807-9. doi: 10.2337/dc08-1968. Epub 2009 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Review of Health Care Professional-Delivered Behavioral Interventions for Youth with Type 1 Diabetes.1型糖尿病青少年的医疗保健专业人员提供的行为干预综述。
Curr Diab Rep. 2025 Aug 12;25(1):44. doi: 10.1007/s11892-025-01601-6.
2
Effectiveness of Educational and Psychoeducational Self-Management Interventions in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.教育和心理教育自我管理干预对1型糖尿病儿童和青少年的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2024 Oct 8;2024:2921845. doi: 10.1155/2024/2921845. eCollection 2024.
3
Long-term effects of non-pharmacological interventions in adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.非药物干预对1型糖尿病青少年和青年的长期影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2024 Dec;21(6):665-677. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12751. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
4
Clinical Utility of Psychoeducational Interventions for Youth with Type 1 Diabetes: A Scoping Review.针对1型糖尿病青少年的心理教育干预措施的临床效用:一项范围综述
Contin Educ. 2021 Jul 15;2(1):76-108. doi: 10.5334/cie.28. eCollection 2021.
5
Motivational Interviewing and Glycemic Control in Adolescents With Poorly Controlled Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.动机性访谈对血糖控制不佳的青少年 1 型糖尿病患者的影响:一项随机对照初步试验。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Mar 12;12:639507. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.639507. eCollection 2021.
6
Motivational Interviewing and Self-Care in Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Study Protocol.动机性访谈联合自我护理在 1 型糖尿病患者中的应用:一项随机对照临床试验研究方案。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020 Dec 10;11:574312. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.574312. eCollection 2020.
7
Motivational Interview to improve vascular health in Adolescents with poorly controlled type 1 Diabetes (MIAD): a randomized controlled trial.动机性访谈改善 1 型糖尿病控制不佳青少年血管健康的研究(MIAD):一项随机对照试验。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Jul;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001216.
8
Psychological interventions to improve self-management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.心理干预对改善 1 型和 2 型糖尿病自我管理的效果:系统综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(28):1-232. doi: 10.3310/hta24280.
9
Using Person-Reported Outcomes (PROs) to Motivate Young People with Diabetes.使用患者报告结局(PROs)来激励糖尿病青少年。
Curr Diab Rep. 2020 May 16;20(7):23. doi: 10.1007/s11892-020-01305-z.
10
Small Interventions for Big Change: Brief Strategies for Distress and Self-Management Amongst Youth with Type 1 Diabetes.小干预,大改变:1 型糖尿病青少年心理困扰和自我管理的简要策略。
Curr Diab Rep. 2020 Jan 30;20(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s11892-020-1290-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Motivational enhancement therapy with and without cognitive behavior therapy to treat type 1 diabetes: a randomized trial.有或无认知行为疗法的动机增强疗法治疗1型糖尿病:一项随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Nov 18;149(10):708-19. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-10-200811180-00005.
2
National standards for diabetes self-management education.糖尿病自我管理教育国家标准。
Diabetes Care. 2008 Jan;31 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S97-104. doi: 10.2337/dc08-S097.
3
A multicenter randomized controlled trial of motivational interviewing in teenagers with diabetes.一项针对青少年糖尿病患者的动机性访谈多中心随机对照试验。
Diabetes Care. 2007 Jun;30(6):1390-5. doi: 10.2337/dc06-2260. Epub 2007 Mar 10.
4
Diabetes management in adolescents in poor metabolic control.代谢控制不佳的青少年糖尿病管理。
Diabetes Educ. 2004 Jul-Aug;30(4):647-57. doi: 10.1177/014572170403000416.
5
Motivational/solution-focused intervention improves HbA1c in adolescents with Type 1 diabetes: a pilot study.以动机/解决方案为导向的干预措施可改善1型糖尿病青少年的糖化血红蛋白水平:一项试点研究。
Diabet Med. 2003 Sep;20(9):739-42. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2003.00995.x.
6
A pilot study of motivational interviewing in adolescents with diabetes.一项针对青少年糖尿病患者的动机性访谈试点研究。
Arch Dis Child. 2003 Aug;88(8):680-3. doi: 10.1136/adc.88.8.680.
7
Motivational interviewing in diabetes practice.糖尿病诊疗中的动机性访谈
Diabet Med. 2002 Jun;19 Suppl 3:1-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.19.s3.2.x.
8
The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale.糖尿病自我护理活动量表总结:7项研究结果及修订版量表
Diabetes Care. 2000 Jul;23(7):943-50. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.7.943.
9
Knowledge and diabetes self-management.
Patient Educ Couns. 1996 Oct;29(1):99-108. doi: 10.1016/0738-3991(96)00938-x.
10
Reliability and validity of a diabetes quality-of-life measure for the diabetes control and complications trial (DCCT). The DCCT Research Group.糖尿病控制与并发症试验(DCCT)中糖尿病生活质量测量方法的可靠性和有效性。DCCT研究小组。
Diabetes Care. 1988 Oct;11(9):725-32. doi: 10.2337/diacare.11.9.725.

一项比较教育中动机性访谈与 1 型糖尿病青少年结构化糖尿病教育的随机对照试验。

A randomized controlled trial comparing motivational interviewing in education to structured diabetes education in teens with type 1 diabetes.

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2010 Aug;33(8):1741-3. doi: 10.2337/dc10-0019. Epub 2010 May 18.

DOI:10.2337/dc10-0019
PMID:20484124
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2909053/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE To compare motivational interviewing-based education (MI) and structured diabetes education (SDE) for improving A1C and psychosocial measures in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This study was a 9-month randomized controlled trial comparing MI (n = 21) to SDE (n = 23). Interventions were at baseline (T0) and 3 months (T1), with A1C and psychosocial measures obtained at 6 months (T2) and 9 months (T3). RESULTS Over the 6 months of follow-up, the SDE group had lower adjusted mean A1C value (least squares mean 10.31, SE 0.32) than the MI group (least squares mean 11.35, SE 0.34) (P = 0.03, d = -0.66). There were no differences on any of the psychosocial measures. CONCLUSIONS SDE is effective at improving metabolic control in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes educators were proficient in learning MI.

摘要

目的

比较基于动机访谈的教育(MI)和结构化糖尿病教育(SDE)对改善 1 型糖尿病青少年的 A1C 和心理社会指标的效果。

研究设计与方法

这是一项为期 9 个月的随机对照试验,比较 MI(n=21)与 SDE(n=23)。干预措施在基线(T0)和 3 个月(T1)进行,在 6 个月(T2)和 9 个月(T3)进行 A1C 和心理社会指标的测量。

结果

在 6 个月的随访期间,SDE 组的调整后平均 A1C 值(最小二乘均值 10.31,SE 0.32)低于 MI 组(最小二乘均值 11.35,SE 0.34)(P=0.03,d=-0.66)。在任何心理社会指标上都没有差异。

结论

SDE 可有效改善 1 型糖尿病青少年的代谢控制。糖尿病教育者在学习 MI 方面表现出色。