Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Diabetes Care. 2010 Aug;33(8):1741-3. doi: 10.2337/dc10-0019. Epub 2010 May 18.
OBJECTIVE To compare motivational interviewing-based education (MI) and structured diabetes education (SDE) for improving A1C and psychosocial measures in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This study was a 9-month randomized controlled trial comparing MI (n = 21) to SDE (n = 23). Interventions were at baseline (T0) and 3 months (T1), with A1C and psychosocial measures obtained at 6 months (T2) and 9 months (T3). RESULTS Over the 6 months of follow-up, the SDE group had lower adjusted mean A1C value (least squares mean 10.31, SE 0.32) than the MI group (least squares mean 11.35, SE 0.34) (P = 0.03, d = -0.66). There were no differences on any of the psychosocial measures. CONCLUSIONS SDE is effective at improving metabolic control in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes educators were proficient in learning MI.
比较基于动机访谈的教育(MI)和结构化糖尿病教育(SDE)对改善 1 型糖尿病青少年的 A1C 和心理社会指标的效果。
这是一项为期 9 个月的随机对照试验,比较 MI(n=21)与 SDE(n=23)。干预措施在基线(T0)和 3 个月(T1)进行,在 6 个月(T2)和 9 个月(T3)进行 A1C 和心理社会指标的测量。
在 6 个月的随访期间,SDE 组的调整后平均 A1C 值(最小二乘均值 10.31,SE 0.32)低于 MI 组(最小二乘均值 11.35,SE 0.34)(P=0.03,d=-0.66)。在任何心理社会指标上都没有差异。
SDE 可有效改善 1 型糖尿病青少年的代谢控制。糖尿病教育者在学习 MI 方面表现出色。