School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2010 Sep;16(5):939-44. doi: 10.1017/S135561771000055X. Epub 2010 May 28.
Hazard perception in driving is the one of the few driving-specific skills associated with crash involvement. However, this relationship has only been examined in studies where the majority of individuals were younger than 65. We present the first data revealing an association between hazard perception and self-reported crash involvement in drivers aged 65 and over. In a sample of 271 drivers, we found that individuals whose mean response time to traffic hazards was slower than 6.68 s [the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve derived pass mark for the test] were 2.32 times [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.46, 3.22) more likely to have been involved in a self-reported crash within the previous 5 years than those with faster response times. This likelihood ratio became 2.37 (95% CI, 1.49, 3.28) when driving exposure was controlled for. As a comparison, individuals who failed a test of useful field of view were 2.70 (95% CI, 1.44, 4.44) times more likely to crash than those who passed. The hazard perception test and the useful field of view measure accounted for separate variance in crash involvement. These findings indicate that hazard perception testing and training could be potentially useful for road safety interventions for this age group.
驾驶中的危险感知是少数与事故相关的驾驶特定技能之一。然而,这种关系仅在研究中进行了检查,其中大多数参与者年龄小于 65 岁。我们首次提供的数据揭示了在 65 岁及以上的驾驶员中,危险感知与自我报告的事故参与之间的关联。在 271 名驾驶员的样本中,我们发现,对于那些交通危险平均反应时间慢于 6.68 秒的个体(测试得出的接收者操作特征 (ROC) 曲线通过标记),在过去 5 年内,他们报告自己发生事故的可能性是那些反应时间较快的个体的 2.32 倍(95%置信区间 (CI),1.46,3.22)。当控制驾驶暴露量时,该似然比变为 2.37(95%CI,1.49,3.28)。作为比较,在视野测试中失败的个体报告自己发生事故的可能性比那些通过测试的个体高 2.70 倍(95%CI,1.44,4.44)。危险感知测试和有用视野测量分别解释了事故参与的差异。这些发现表明,对于该年龄段的道路安全干预措施,危险感知测试和培训可能具有潜在的作用。