Menzies School of Health Research, Darwin, NT, Australia.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2010 Jun;10(6):405-16. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70079-7.
Early parasitological diagnosis and treatment with artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) are key components of worldwide malaria elimination programmes. In general, use of ACTs has been limited to patients with falciparum malaria whereas blood-stage infections with Plasmodium vivax are mostly still treated with chloroquine. We review the evidence for the relative benefits and disadvantages of the existing separate treatment approach versus a unified ACT-based strategy for treating Plasmodium falciparum and P vivax infections in regions where both species are endemic (co-endemic). The separate treatment scenario is justifiable if P vivax remains sensitive to chloroquine and diagnostic tests reliably distinguish P vivax from P falciparum. However, with the high number of misdiagnoses in routine practice and the rise and spread of chloroquine-resistant P vivax, there might be a compelling rationale for a unified ACT-based strategy for vivax and falciparum malaria in all co-endemic regions. Analyses of the cost-effectiveness of ACTs for both Plasmodium species are needed to assess the role of these drugs in the control and elimination of vivax malaria.
早期采用青蒿素为基础的联合疗法(ACTs)进行寄生虫学诊断和治疗是全球消除疟疾规划的关键组成部分。一般来说,ACTs 的使用仅限于患有恶性疟原虫疟疾的患者,而间日疟原虫的血期感染仍大多用氯喹治疗。我们回顾了现有的针对间日疟原虫和恶性疟原虫感染的分别治疗方法和统一的基于 ACT 的治疗策略的相对优势和劣势的证据,这些策略在两种疟原虫都流行(共流行)的地区适用。如果间日疟原虫仍然对氯喹敏感,并且诊断测试能够可靠地区分间日疟原虫和恶性疟原虫,那么分别治疗的方案是合理的。然而,由于常规实践中存在大量误诊,以及氯喹耐药的间日疟原虫的出现和传播,对于所有共流行地区的间日疟原虫和恶性疟原虫的统一基于 ACT 的治疗策略可能具有令人信服的理由。需要对两种疟原虫的 ACT 成本效益进行分析,以评估这些药物在控制和消除间日疟中的作用。