• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1 型糖尿病患儿及其照护者能否估计餐食和零食中的碳水化合物含量?

Can children with Type 1 diabetes and their caregivers estimate the carbohydrate content of meals and snacks?

机构信息

Department of Paediatric Endocrinology, John Hunter Children's Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 2010 Mar;27(3):348-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.02945.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.02945.x
PMID:20536499
Abstract

AIMS

Carbohydrate (CHO) counting allows children with Type 1 diabetes to adjust mealtime insulin dose to carbohydrate intake. Little is known about the ability of children to count CHO and whether a particular method for assessing CHO quantity is better than others. We investigated how accurately children and their caregivers estimate carbohydrate, and whether counting in gram increments improves accuracy compared with CHO portions or exchanges.

METHODS

One hundred and two children and adolescents (age range 8.3-18.1 years) on intensive insulin therapy and 110 caregivers independently estimated the CHO content of 17 standardized meals (containing 8-90 g CHO), using whichever method of carbohydrate quantification they had been taught (gram increments, 10-g portions or 15-g exchanges).

RESULTS

Seventy-three per cent (n = 2530) of all estimates were within 10-15 g of actual CHO content. There was no relationship between the mean percentage error and method of carbohydrate counting or glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) (P > 0.05). Mean gram error and meal size were negatively correlated (r = -0.70, P < 0.0001). The longer children had been CHO counting the greater the mean percentage error (r = 0.173, P = 0.014). Core foods in non-standard quantities were most frequently inaccurately estimated, while individually labelled foods were most often accurately estimated.

CONCLUSIONS

Children with Type 1 diabetes and their caregivers can estimate the carbohydrate content of meals with reasonable accuracy. Teaching CHO counting in gram increments did not improve accuracy compared with CHO portions or exchanges. Large meals tended to be underestimated and snacks overestimated. Repeated age-appropriate education appears necessary to maintain accuracy in carbohydrate estimations.

摘要

目的

碳水化合物(CHO)计数可使 1 型糖尿病患儿根据碳水化合物摄入量调整餐时胰岛素剂量。目前尚不清楚儿童计数 CHO 的能力,以及评估 CHO 数量的特定方法是否优于其他方法。我们研究了儿童和他们的照顾者对碳水化合物的估计有多准确,以及与 CHO 份数或交换相比,以克为增量计数是否能提高准确性。

方法

102 名接受强化胰岛素治疗的儿童和青少年(年龄 8.3-18.1 岁)和 110 名照顾者独立估计了 17 种标准化餐的 CHO 含量(每份含有 8-90 克 CHO),使用他们接受的任何一种碳水化合物定量方法(克增量、10 克份或 15 克交换)。

结果

所有估计值中有 73%(n=2530)在实际 CHO 含量的 10-15 克范围内。平均误差百分比与碳水化合物计数方法或糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)之间没有关系(P>0.05)。平均克误差与膳食大小呈负相关(r=-0.70,P<0.0001)。儿童进行 CHO 计数的时间越长,平均百分比误差越大(r=0.173,P=0.014)。非标准数量的核心食物最常被不准确地估计,而单独标记的食物则最常被准确估计。

结论

1 型糖尿病儿童及其照顾者可以合理准确地估计膳食中的碳水化合物含量。与 CHO 份数或交换相比,以克为增量进行 CHO 计数并不能提高准确性。大份餐往往被低估,而零食则被高估。似乎需要反复进行适合年龄的教育,以保持对碳水化合物估计的准确性。

相似文献

1
Can children with Type 1 diabetes and their caregivers estimate the carbohydrate content of meals and snacks?1 型糖尿病患儿及其照护者能否估计餐食和零食中的碳水化合物含量?
Diabet Med. 2010 Mar;27(3):348-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.02945.x.
2
Children and adolescents on intensive insulin therapy maintain postprandial glycaemic control without precise carbohydrate counting.接受强化胰岛素治疗的儿童和青少年在不精确计算碳水化合物摄入量的情况下也能维持餐后血糖控制。
Diabet Med. 2009 Mar;26(3):279-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02669.x.
3
Teaching and training programme on carbohydrate counting in Type 1 diabetic patients.1型糖尿病患者碳水化合物计数教学与培训项目
Diabetes Nutr Metab. 2001 Oct;14(5):259-67.
4
The importance of carbohydrate counting in the treatment of children with diabetes.碳水化合物计数在儿童糖尿病治疗中的重要性。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2007 Oct;8 Suppl 6:57-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2007.00287.x.
5
Accurate Carbohydrate Counting Is an Important Determinant of Postprandial Glycemia in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes on Insulin Pump Therapy.准确的碳水化合物计数是接受胰岛素泵治疗的1型糖尿病儿童和青少年餐后血糖的重要决定因素。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Jul;11(4):753-758. doi: 10.1177/1932296816679850. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
6
Randomized nutrition education intervention to improve carbohydrate counting in adolescents with type 1 diabetes study: is more intensive education needed?随机营养教育干预以改善 1 型糖尿病青少年的碳水化合物计数研究:是否需要更强化的教育?
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012 Nov;112(11):1736-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2012.06.001. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
7
One potato, two potato,… assessing carbohydrate counting accuracy in adolescents with type 1 diabetes.一个土豆,两个土豆,…评估 1 型糖尿病青少年的碳水化合物计数准确性。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2018 Nov;19(7):1302-1308. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12717. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
8
The relationship between carbohydrate and the mealtime insulin dose in type 1 diabetes.1型糖尿病中碳水化合物与进餐时胰岛素剂量之间的关系。
J Diabetes Complications. 2015 Nov-Dec;29(8):1323-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2015.08.014. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
9
[Evaluation of an original tool for carbohydrate counting, aimed at facilitating the implementation of functional insulin therapy].[评估一种用于碳水化合物计数的原创工具,旨在促进功能性胰岛素治疗的实施]
Bull Acad Natl Med. 2013 Jan;197(1):93-102; discussion 102.
10
Diabetes patients' ability to estimate dietary carbohydrate content for use in a decision support system.糖尿病患者在决策支持系统中估算膳食碳水化合物含量的能力。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2002;90:649-54.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of carbohydrate counting in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.碳水化合物计数法对1型和2型糖尿病患者的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diabetol Int. 2025 Apr 10;16(3):546-558. doi: 10.1007/s13340-025-00810-4. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Effect on Glycemic Control of an Early Intensive Dietary Structured Education Program for Newly Diagnosed Children with Type 1 Diabetes in Jordan.约旦针对新诊断出的1型糖尿病儿童的早期强化饮食结构化教育计划对血糖控制的影响。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2023 Apr 28;2023:7258136. doi: 10.1155/2023/7258136. eCollection 2023.
3
Effects of basic carbohydrate counting versus standard dietary care for glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes (The BCC Study): a randomised, controlled trial.
基础碳水化合物计数与标准饮食护理对 2 型糖尿病血糖控制的影响(BCC 研究):一项随机对照试验。
Nutr Diabetes. 2024 Jun 27;14(1):47. doi: 10.1038/s41387-024-00307-0.
4
Exploring Family Perspectives on a Group-Based Hands-on Advanced Carbohydrate Counting Education Program for Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes: A Qualitative Study.探索基于小组的动手进阶碳水化合物计数教育方案在 1 型糖尿病儿童和青少年中的家庭观点:一项定性研究。
Nutrients. 2024 May 25;16(11):1618. doi: 10.3390/nu16111618.
5
Sensor-Based Glucose Metrics during Different Diet Compositions in Type 1 Diabetes-A Randomized One-Week Crossover Trial.基于传感器的 1 型糖尿病不同饮食组成下的血糖指标:一项随机一周交叉试验。
Nutrients. 2024 Jan 8;16(2):199. doi: 10.3390/nu16020199.
6
Associations Between Psychosocial Needs, Carbohydrate-Counting Behavior, and App Satisfaction: A Randomized Crossover App Trial on 92 Adults With Diabetes.心理社会需求、碳水化合物计数行为与应用程序满意度之间的关联:一项针对 92 名糖尿病成人的随机交叉应用程序试验。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2023 Dec 1;41(12):1026-1036. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000001073.
7
Carbohydrate Counting, Empowerment and Glycemic Outcomes in Adolescents and Young Adults with Long Duration of Type 1 Diabetes.碳水化合物计数、赋权与青少年和青年长期 1 型糖尿病患者的血糖结局。
Nutrients. 2023 Nov 18;15(22):4825. doi: 10.3390/nu15224825.
8
In Silico Validation of Personalized Safe Intervals for Carbohydrate Counting Errors.基于计算机的个体化碳水化合物计数错误安全区间验证。
Nutrients. 2023 Sep 22;15(19):4110. doi: 10.3390/nu15194110.
9
A new proposal for a second insulin bolus to optimize postprandial glucose profile in adolescents with type 1 diabetes.一项关于给予第二次胰岛素大剂量注射以优化1型糖尿病青少年餐后血糖曲线的新提议。
Acta Diabetol. 2023 May;60(5):609-618. doi: 10.1007/s00592-022-02019-2. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
10
Evaluation of carbohydrate counting knowledge among individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.沙特阿拉伯1型糖尿病患者碳水化合物计数知识评估:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2022 Nov 28;5(2):344-351. doi: 10.1136/bmjnph-2022-000553. eCollection 2022 Dec.