逻辑分析：检验项目理论以更好地评估复杂干预措施。
LOGIC ANALYSIS: TESTING PROGRAM THEORY TO BETTER EVALUATE COMPLEX INTERVENTIONS.
作者信息
Rey Lynda, Brousselle Astrid, Dedobbeleer Nicole
机构信息
Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec.
Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Québec.
出版信息
Can J Program Eval. 2011 Jan 1;26(3):61-89.
Abstract
Evaluating complex interventions requires an understanding of the program's logic of action. Logic analysis, a specific type of program theory evaluation based on scientific knowledge, can help identify either the critical conditions for achieving desired outcomes or alternative interventions for that purpose. In this article, we outline the principles of logic analysis and its roots. We then illustrate its use with an actual evaluation case. Finally, we discuss the advantages of conducting logic analysis prior to other types of evaluations. This article will provide evaluators with both theoretical and practical information to help them in conceptualizing their evaluations.
摘要
评估复杂干预措施需要理解项目的行动逻辑。逻辑分析是一种基于科学知识的特定类型的项目理论评估，它可以帮助确定实现预期结果的关键条件或为此目的的替代干预措施。在本文中，我们概述了逻辑分析的原则及其根源。然后，我们通过一个实际评估案例来说明其用法。最后，我们讨论在进行其他类型评估之前进行逻辑分析的优点。本文将为评估人员提供理论和实践信息，以帮助他们构思评估。
相似文献
1
LOGIC ANALYSIS: TESTING PROGRAM THEORY TO BETTER EVALUATE COMPLEX INTERVENTIONS.
Can J Program Eval. 2011 Jan 1;26(3):61-89.
2
Program theory evaluation: Logic analysis.
Eval Program Plann. 2011 Feb;34(1):69-78. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.04.001. Epub 2010 Jun 11.
3
Defining, illustrating and reflecting on logic analysis with an example from a professional development program.
Eval Program Plann. 2013 Oct;40:64-73. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2013.05.004. Epub 2013 Jun 2.
4
Semi-structured interview protocol for constructing logic models.
Eval Program Plann. 2007 Nov;30(4):339-50. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2007.08.004. Epub 2007 Aug 22.
5
Evaluating complex interventions in real context: Logic analysis of a case management program for frequent users of healthcare services.
Eval Program Plann. 2020 Apr;79:101753. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101753. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
6
Use of program logic models in the Southern Rural Access Program evaluation.
J Rural Health. 2003;19 Suppl:308-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2003.tb01049.x.
7
Tailoring Process and Impact Evaluation of a "Cash-Plus" Program: The Value of Using a Participatory Program Impact Pathway Analysis.
Curr Dev Nutr. 2020 May 28;4(7):nzaa099. doi: 10.1093/cdn/nzaa099. eCollection 2020 Jul.
8
The Father Friendly Initiative within Families: Using a logic model to develop program theory for a father support program.
Eval Program Plann. 2015 Oct;52:133-41. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.04.006. Epub 2015 May 21.
9
Simple but not simplistic: Findings from a theory-driven retrospective evaluation of a small projects program.
Eval Program Plann. 2023 Apr;97:102267. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102267. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
10
Logic models for the Therapeutic Return-to-Work Program as adapted for common mental disorders: A guide for health professionals.
Work. 2020;67(2):345-358. doi: 10.3233/WOR-203284.
引用本文的文献
1
Building a Logic Model to Foster Engagement and Learning Using the Case of a Province-Wide Multispecies Antimicrobial Use Monitoring System.
Eval Rev. 2024 Aug;48(4):736-765. doi: 10.1177/0193841X231198706. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
2
Using collaborative logic analysis evaluation to test the program theory of an intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment for youth with pain-related disability.
Paediatr Neonatal Pain. 2020 Apr 23;2(4):113-130. doi: 10.1002/pne2.12018. eCollection 2020 Dec.
3
Five ways to get a grip on the shortcomings of logic models in program evaluation.
Can Med Educ J. 2021 Dec 29;12(6):96-99. doi: 10.36834/cmej.71966. eCollection 2021 Dec.
4
Characterising innovations in maternal and newborn health based on a common theory of change: lessons from developing and applying a characterisation framework in Nigeria, Ethiopia and India.
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Jul 18;4(4):e001405. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001405. eCollection 2019.
5
Analysing mHealth usage logs in RCTs: Explaining participants' interactions with type 2 diabetes self-management tools.
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 30;13(8):e0203202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203202. eCollection 2018.
6
A comparative analysis of centralized waiting lists for patients without a primary care provider implemented in six Canadian provinces: study protocol.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 21;17(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2007-8.
7
Interaction between non-executive and executive directors in English National Health Service trust boards: an observational study.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Oct 15;15:470. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1127-2.
8
A process-based framework to guide nurse practitioners integration into primary healthcare teams: results from a logic analysis.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Feb 27;15:78. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0731-5.
本文引用的文献
1
Using Logic Analysis to Evaluate Knowledge Transfer Initiatives: The Case of the Research Collective on the Organization of Primary Care Services.
Evaluation (Lond). 2009 Apr;15(2):165-183. doi: 10.1177/1356389008101967.
2
"If we only got a chance." Barriers to and possibilities for a more health-promoting health service.
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2009 Dec 22;3:1-9. doi: 10.2147/jmdh.s8104.
3
Program theory evaluation: Logic analysis.
Eval Program Plann. 2011 Feb;34(1):69-78. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.04.001. Epub 2010 Jun 11.
4
Health promoting health services: a review of the evidence.
Health Promot Int. 2010 Jun;25(2):230-7. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daq010. Epub 2010 Feb 23.
5
Evaluating interventions aimed at promoting information utilization in organizations and systems.
Healthc Policy. 2008 Aug;4(1):89-107.
6
The organisational diagnosis of a Health Promoting Hospital in Taiwan.
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Aug;76(2):248-53. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.12.025. Epub 2009 Feb 7.
7
Health promotion services for lifestyle development within a UK hospital--Patients' experiences and views.
BMC Public Health. 2008 Aug 13;8:284. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-284.
8
Health-promoting hospitals in Estonia: what are they doing differently?
Health Promot Int. 2007 Dec;22(4):327-36. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dam032. Epub 2007 Nov 6.
9
Realist review to understand the efficacy of school feeding programmes.
BMJ. 2007 Oct 27;335(7625):858-61. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39359.525174.AD. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
10
Beyond the limitations of best practices: how logic analysis helped reinterpret dual diagnosis guidelines.
Eval Program Plann. 2007 Feb;30(1):94-104. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2006.10.005. Epub 2006 Dec 26.
Zotero 插件