逻辑分析：检验项目理论以更好地评估复杂干预措施。
LOGIC ANALYSIS: TESTING PROGRAM THEORY TO BETTER EVALUATE COMPLEX INTERVENTIONS.
作者信息
Rey Lynda, Brousselle Astrid, Dedobbeleer Nicole
机构信息
Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec.
Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Québec.
出版信息
Can J Program Eval. 2011 Jan 1;26(3):61-89.
Abstract
Evaluating complex interventions requires an understanding of the program's logic of action. Logic analysis, a specific type of program theory evaluation based on scientific knowledge, can help identify either the critical conditions for achieving desired outcomes or alternative interventions for that purpose. In this article, we outline the principles of logic analysis and its roots. We then illustrate its use with an actual evaluation case. Finally, we discuss the advantages of conducting logic analysis prior to other types of evaluations. This article will provide evaluators with both theoretical and practical information to help them in conceptualizing their evaluations.
摘要
评估复杂干预措施需要理解项目的行动逻辑。逻辑分析是一种基于科学知识的特定类型的项目理论评估，它可以帮助确定实现预期结果的关键条件或为此目的的替代干预措施。在本文中，我们概述了逻辑分析的原则及其根源。然后，我们通过一个实际评估案例来说明其用法。最后，我们讨论在进行其他类型评估之前进行逻辑分析的优点。本文将为评估人员提供理论和实践信息，以帮助他们构思评估。
相似文献
1
LOGIC ANALYSIS: TESTING PROGRAM THEORY TO BETTER EVALUATE COMPLEX INTERVENTIONS.逻辑分析：检验项目理论以更好地评估复杂干预措施。
Can J Program Eval. 2011 Jan 1;26(3):61-89.
2
Program theory evaluation: Logic analysis.项目理论评估：逻辑分析。
Eval Program Plann. 2011 Feb;34(1):69-78. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.04.001. Epub 2010 Jun 11.
3
Defining, illustrating and reflecting on logic analysis with an example from a professional development program.通过一个专业发展项目中的例子来定义、阐释和反思逻辑分析。
Eval Program Plann. 2013 Oct;40:64-73. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2013.05.004. Epub 2013 Jun 2.
4
Semi-structured interview protocol for constructing logic models.用于构建逻辑模型的半结构化访谈方案。
Eval Program Plann. 2007 Nov;30(4):339-50. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2007.08.004. Epub 2007 Aug 22.
5
Evaluating complex interventions in real context: Logic analysis of a case management program for frequent users of healthcare services.在实际情境中评估复杂干预措施：一项针对医疗服务频繁使用者的病例管理项目的逻辑分析
Eval Program Plann. 2020 Apr;79:101753. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101753. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
6
Use of program logic models in the Southern Rural Access Program evaluation.项目逻辑模型在南方农村就医项目评估中的应用。
J Rural Health. 2003;19 Suppl:308-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2003.tb01049.x.
7
Tailoring Process and Impact Evaluation of a "Cash-Plus" Program: The Value of Using a Participatory Program Impact Pathway Analysis.“现金加”项目的定制过程与影响评估：运用参与式项目影响路径分析的价值
Curr Dev Nutr. 2020 May 28;4(7):nzaa099. doi: 10.1093/cdn/nzaa099. eCollection 2020 Jul.
8
The Father Friendly Initiative within Families: Using a logic model to develop program theory for a father support program.家庭中的父亲友好倡议：运用逻辑模型为父亲支持项目制定项目理论。
Eval Program Plann. 2015 Oct;52:133-41. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.04.006. Epub 2015 May 21.
9
Simple but not simplistic: Findings from a theory-driven retrospective evaluation of a small projects program.简单但不简单：从小型项目计划的理论驱动回顾评估中得出的发现。
Eval Program Plann. 2023 Apr;97:102267. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102267. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
10
Logic models for the Therapeutic Return-to-Work Program as adapted for common mental disorders: A guide for health professionals.治疗性重返工作方案的逻辑模型：适应常见精神障碍的健康专业人员指南。
Work. 2020;67(2):345-358. doi: 10.3233/WOR-203284.
引用本文的文献
1
Building a Logic Model to Foster Engagement and Learning Using the Case of a Province-Wide Multispecies Antimicrobial Use Monitoring System.构建一个逻辑模型，以促进参与和学习，以全省范围的多物种抗生素使用监测系统为例。
Eval Rev. 2024 Aug;48(4):736-765. doi: 10.1177/0193841X231198706. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
2
Using collaborative logic analysis evaluation to test the program theory of an intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment for youth with pain-related disability.运用协作逻辑分析评估来检验针对患有疼痛相关残疾的青少年的强化跨学科疼痛治疗的项目理论。
Paediatr Neonatal Pain. 2020 Apr 23;2(4):113-130. doi: 10.1002/pne2.12018. eCollection 2020 Dec.
3
Five ways to get a grip on the shortcomings of logic models in program evaluation.掌控项目评估中逻辑模型缺点的五种方法。
Can Med Educ J. 2021 Dec 29;12(6):96-99. doi: 10.36834/cmej.71966. eCollection 2021 Dec.
4
Characterising innovations in maternal and newborn health based on a common theory of change: lessons from developing and applying a characterisation framework in Nigeria, Ethiopia and India.基于共同变革理论的孕产妇和新生儿健康创新特征分析：在尼日利亚、埃塞俄比亚和印度制定和应用特征分析框架的经验教训
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Jul 18;4(4):e001405. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001405. eCollection 2019.
5
Analysing mHealth usage logs in RCTs: Explaining participants' interactions with type 2 diabetes self-management tools.分析 RCT 中的移动医疗使用日志：解释参与者与 2 型糖尿病自我管理工具的交互作用。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 30;13(8):e0203202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203202. eCollection 2018.
6
A comparative analysis of centralized waiting lists for patients without a primary care provider implemented in six Canadian provinces: study protocol.加拿大六个省份实施的针对无初级保健提供者患者的集中等候名单的比较分析：研究方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 21;17(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2007-8.
7
Interaction between non-executive and executive directors in English National Health Service trust boards: an observational study.英国国家医疗服务体系信托委员会中非执行董事与执行董事之间的互动：一项观察性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Oct 15;15:470. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1127-2.
8
A process-based framework to guide nurse practitioners integration into primary healthcare teams: results from a logic analysis.一个基于流程的框架，用于指导执业护士融入基层医疗团队：逻辑分析结果
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Feb 27;15:78. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0731-5.
本文引用的文献
1
Using Logic Analysis to Evaluate Knowledge Transfer Initiatives: The Case of the Research Collective on the Organization of Primary Care Services.运用逻辑分析评估知识转移举措：以初级保健服务组织研究集体为例。
Evaluation (Lond). 2009 Apr;15(2):165-183. doi: 10.1177/1356389008101967.
2
"If we only got a chance." Barriers to and possibilities for a more health-promoting health service.“如果我们有机会的话。”促进健康服务更加促进健康的障碍和可能性。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2009 Dec 22;3:1-9. doi: 10.2147/jmdh.s8104.
3
Program theory evaluation: Logic analysis.项目理论评估：逻辑分析。
Eval Program Plann. 2011 Feb;34(1):69-78. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.04.001. Epub 2010 Jun 11.
4
Health promoting health services: a review of the evidence.促进健康的卫生服务：证据回顾。
Health Promot Int. 2010 Jun;25(2):230-7. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daq010. Epub 2010 Feb 23.
5
Evaluating interventions aimed at promoting information utilization in organizations and systems.评估旨在促进组织和系统中信息利用的干预措施。
Healthc Policy. 2008 Aug;4(1):89-107.
6
The organisational diagnosis of a Health Promoting Hospital in Taiwan.台湾促进健康医院的组织诊断。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Aug;76(2):248-53. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.12.025. Epub 2009 Feb 7.
7
Health promotion services for lifestyle development within a UK hospital--Patients' experiences and views.英国一家医院内促进生活方式发展的健康促进服务——患者的经历与看法。
BMC Public Health. 2008 Aug 13;8:284. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-284.
8
Health-promoting hospitals in Estonia: what are they doing differently?爱沙尼亚的健康促进医院：它们有何不同之处？
Health Promot Int. 2007 Dec;22(4):327-36. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dam032. Epub 2007 Nov 6.
9
Realist review to understand the efficacy of school feeding programmes.现实主义综述以了解学校供餐计划的成效。
BMJ. 2007 Oct 27;335(7625):858-61. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39359.525174.AD. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
10
Beyond the limitations of best practices: how logic analysis helped reinterpret dual diagnosis guidelines.超越最佳实践的局限：逻辑分析如何助力重新解读双重诊断指南
Eval Program Plann. 2007 Feb;30(1):94-104. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2006.10.005. Epub 2006 Dec 26.
Zotero 插件