Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Arlington, Virginia 22201, USA.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2010 Jun;11(3):240-8. doi: 10.1080/15389580903578854.
The objective of the current study was to quantify the effects of the strength of US state graduated driver licensing laws and specific licensing components on the rate of teenage driver fatal crash involvements per 100,000 teenagers during 1996-2007. The strengths of state laws were rated good, fair, marginal, or poor based on a system developed previously by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.
Analysis was based on quarterly counts of drivers involved in fatal crashes. Associations of overall ratings and individual licensing components with teenage crash rates were evaluated using Poisson regression, with the corresponding fatal crash rate for drivers ages 30-59 controlling for state- or time-dependent influences on crash rates unrelated to graduated licensing laws.
Compared with licensing laws rated poor, laws rated good were associated with 30 percent lower fatal crash rates among 15- to 17-year-olds. Laws rated fair yielded fatal crash rates 11 percent lower. The longer the permit age was delayed, or the longer the licensing age was delayed, the lower the estimated fatal crash rates among 15- to 17-year-olds. Stronger nighttime restrictions were associated with larger reductions, and reductions were larger for laws limiting teenage passengers to zero or one than laws allowing two or more teenage passengers or laws without passenger restrictions. After the effects of any related delay in licensure were accounted for, an increase in the minimum learner's permit holding period showed no association with fatal crash rates. An increase in required practice driving hours did not appear to have an independent association with fatal crash rates.
Graduated licensing laws that include strong nighttime and passenger restrictions and laws that delay the learner's permit age and licensing age are associated with lower teenage fatal crash rates. States that adopt such laws can expect to achieve substantial reductions in crash deaths.
本研究旨在量化美国各州驾驶员分级许可法的力度及其具体许可组成部分对 1996 年至 2007 年期间每 10 万名青少年驾驶员致命撞车事故发生率的影响。州法律的强度根据先前由公路安全保险协会制定的系统进行了良好、一般、边缘或差的评级。
分析基于每季度涉及致命撞车事故的驾驶员人数的计数。使用泊松回归评估整体评级和个别许可组件与青少年撞车率之间的关联,使用 30-59 岁驾驶员的相应致命撞车率来控制与分级许可法无关的、与州或时间相关的对撞车率的影响。
与评级差的许可法相比,评级好的许可法与 15-17 岁青少年的致命撞车率降低 30%相关。评级一般的法律导致致命撞车率降低 11%。许可证年龄延迟的时间越长,或驾驶年龄延迟的时间越长,15-17 岁青少年的估计致命撞车率就越低。夜间限制越严格,降低幅度越大,与允许两名或更多青少年乘客或不限制乘客数量的法律相比,限制零名或一名青少年乘客的法律降低幅度更大。在考虑到任何相关许可延迟的影响后,学习者许可证持有期的增加与致命撞车率没有关联。所需的练习驾驶时间的增加似乎与致命撞车率没有独立关联。
包含严格的夜间和乘客限制的分级许可法,以及延迟学习者许可证年龄和驾驶年龄的法律,与青少年致命撞车率降低相关。采用此类法律的州可以期望实现撞车死亡人数的大幅减少。