• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

华西医院制定了一套中文评估腰痛治疗的措施。

West China hospital set of measures in Chinese to evaluate back pain treatment.

机构信息

Pain Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84108, USA.

出版信息

Pain Med. 2010 May;11(5):637-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00846.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00846.x
PMID:20546508
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Chinese is the most commonly spoken language in the world, and back pain is as prevalent in China as it is elsewhere. Nevertheless, there is a paucity of measures in Chinese to evaluate back pain treatment. We assemble a set of Chinese measures to evaluate outcomes in diverse domains. A set of measures is necessary, because measures in one domain may vary independently from measures in another. Chinese measures are in four domains: pain intensity, global rating of improvement, physical disability, and emotional functioning. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) represents the domain of physical disability, and both the World Health Organization Five-Item Well-being Index (WHO-5) and the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D depression scale) represent the domain of emotional functioning.

DESIGN

Measures were cross-culturally adapted into Chinese. The development of Chinese versions of the ODI, the WHO-5, and the CES-D entailed psychometric evaluation. Additionally, we administered the previously validated Chinese SF-36 to evaluate the validity of measures in our set.

SETTING

The western-style Pain Clinic and the Acupuncture Clinic of West China Hospital (Chengdu, Sichuan Province).

PATIENTS

Eighty-six patients with nonspecific back pain.

RESULTS

We found no significant differences between patients from the Pain Clinic and those from the Acupuncture Clinic. For the ODI, the CES-D, and the WHO-5, we evaluated the psychometric properties of reliability, validity, and ceiling and floor effects. We found these properties to be good to excellent.

CONCLUSIONS

In the Appendix (available online, in supplemental materials for this article), we present the West China Hospital set of measures in Chinese to evaluate back pain treatment.

摘要

目的

中文是世界上使用最广泛的语言,而背痛在中国和其他地方一样普遍。然而,中文中用于评估背痛治疗效果的方法却很少。我们收集了一套中文评估工具,用于评估不同领域的治疗效果。之所以需要这样一套工具,是因为一个领域的评估方法可能与另一个领域的评估方法独立变化。中文评估工具包括四个领域:疼痛强度、整体改善评分、身体残疾和情绪功能。Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)代表身体残疾领域,世界卫生组织五维健康量表(WHO-5)和流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D 抑郁量表)代表情绪功能领域。

设计

这些评估工具被跨文化改编为中文。ODI、WHO-5 和 CES-D 的中文版本的开发涉及心理测量学评估。此外,我们还使用了之前验证过的中文 SF-36 来评估我们设定的评估工具的有效性。

地点

华西医院的西式疼痛诊所和针灸诊所(四川省成都市)。

患者

86 名患有非特异性背痛的患者。

结果

我们发现疼痛诊所和针灸诊所的患者之间没有显著差异。对于 ODI、CES-D 和 WHO-5,我们评估了可靠性、有效性、天花板和地板效应的心理测量学特性。我们发现这些特性良好到优秀。

结论

在附录中(可在线查阅,本文补充材料),我们提供了华西医院的中文背痛治疗评估工具集。

相似文献

1
West China hospital set of measures in Chinese to evaluate back pain treatment.华西医院制定了一套中文评估腰痛治疗的措施。
Pain Med. 2010 May;11(5):637-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00846.x.
2
The Oswestry Disability Index, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: translation and validation studies of the Iranian versions.奥斯威斯瑞残疾指数、罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷及魁北克背痛残疾量表:伊朗版本的翻译与验证研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Jun 15;31(14):E454-9. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000222141.61424.f7.
3
Development of the Italian version of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI-I): A cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity study.意大利版奥斯威斯利功能障碍指数(ODI-I)的开发:一项跨文化适应、信效度研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Sep 1;34(19):2090-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181aa1e6b.
4
Validation in Colombia of the Oswestry disability questionnaire in patients with low back pain.哥伦比亚低腰痛患者 Oswestry 残疾问卷的验证。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Dec 15;36(26):E1730-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318219d184.
5
Development of a Brazilian Portuguese version of the Oswestry Disability Index: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity.巴西葡萄牙语版奥斯威斯垂残疾指数的开发:跨文化调适、信度与效度
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Feb 15;32(4):481-6. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000255075.11496.47.
6
[Validating the Oswestry Disability Index in patients with low back pain in Sichuan].[验证奥斯维斯特里功能障碍指数在四川腰痛患者中的有效性]
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2009 May;40(3):559-61.
7
Development of a French-Canadian version of the Oswestry Disability Index: cross-cultural adaptation and validation.《Oswestry 残疾指数的法加版本开发:跨文化调适与验证》。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Apr 1;37(7):E439-44. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318233eaf9.
8
The Neck Pain and Disability Scale: cross-cultural adaptation into German and evaluation of its psychometric properties in chronic neck pain and C1-2 fusion patients.颈部疼痛与功能障碍量表:跨文化适应为德语版本并对其在慢性颈部疼痛患者和C1-2融合患者中的心理测量学特性进行评估
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Apr 20;33(9):1018-27. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816c9107.
9
Validation of the Turkish version of the Quebec back pain disability scale for patients with low back pain.针对腰痛患者的魁北克腰痛残疾量表土耳其语版本的验证
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Mar 15;34(6):E219-24. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181971e2d.
10
Clinimetric testing of three self-report outcome measures for low back pain patients in Brazil: which one is the best?巴西腰痛患者三种自我报告结局指标的临床测量学测试:哪一种最佳?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Oct 15;33(22):2459-63. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181849dbe.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations of sport participation with subjective well-being: a study consisting of a sample of Chinese school-attending students.参与体育运动与主观幸福感的关系:一项对中国在校学生样本进行的研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 23;11:1199782. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1199782. eCollection 2023.
2
A protocol for a type 1 effectiveness-implementation randomized controlled trial of the WHO digital mental health intervention Step-by-Step to address depression among Chinese young adults in Macao (SAR), China.一项针对世界卫生组织数字心理健康干预措施“循序渐进”的1型有效性-实施随机对照试验方案,该干预措施旨在解决中国澳门特别行政区中国青年成年人的抑郁症问题。
Internet Interv. 2022 Sep 28;30:100579. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2022.100579. eCollection 2022 Dec.
3
Competence in Daily Activities and Mental Well-Being among Technical Intern Trainees in Japan: A Cross-Sectional Study.日本技能实习生日常生活活动能力与心理健康状况的关系:一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 8;19(6):3189. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063189.
4
A Feasibility Study of the WHO Digital Mental Health Intervention Step-by-Step to Address Depression Among Chinese Young Adults.世界卫生组织数字心理健康干预措施逐步解决中国青年抑郁症问题的可行性研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jan 7;12:812667. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.812667. eCollection 2021.
5
Brief Report: Mindfulness Training for Chinese Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Their Parents in Hong Kong.简要报告:香港自闭症谱系障碍青少年及其家长的正念训练。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2021 Nov;51(11):4147-4159. doi: 10.1007/s10803-020-04729-4.
6
Exploring health and well-being in Taiwan: what we can learn from individuals' narratives.探索台湾的健康与福祉:从个体叙事中我们能学到什么。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Feb 3;20(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8201-3.
7
The Association of Trauma with the Physical, Behavioral, and Social Health of Women Living with HIV: Pathways to Guide Trauma-informed Health Care Interventions.创伤与艾滋病毒感染者女性的生理、行为和社会健康的关联:指导以创伤为中心的卫生保健干预措施的途径。
Womens Health Issues. 2019 Sep-Oct;29(5):376-384. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2019.06.001. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
8
Evaluating the Relationship between Well-Being and Living with a Dog for People with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Feasibility Study.评估慢性下背痛患者的幸福感与与狗共同生活之间的关系:一项可行性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 25;16(8):1472. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16081472.
9
Effects of a mindfulness-based intervention (MYmind) for children with ADHD and their parents: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项针对多动症儿童及其父母的正念干预(MYmind)的效果:一项随机对照试验的方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 12;8(11):e022514. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022514.
10
Early surgery with antibiotics treatment had better clinical outcomes than antibiotics treatment alone in patients with pyogenic spondylodiscitis: a retrospective cohort study.在化脓性脊椎间盘炎患者中,早期手术联合抗生素治疗比单纯抗生素治疗具有更好的临床疗效:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Apr 27;18(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1533-1.