Walton Centre for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Lower Lane, Fazakerley, Liverpool, UK.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010 Sep;81(9):1049-51. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2008.151340. Epub 2010 Jun 14.
The 21-item Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) has been recommended as an outcome measure for use in multiple sclerosis and is commonly used to generate an overall score of fatigue.
To test if the MFIS total score is valid by application of the Rasch measurement model.
The MFIS was sent by post to patients with clinically definite multiple sclerosis in two centres in the UK. Data were fitted to the Rasch model.
Analysis was based on 415 records (55% response). The 21-item scale did not fit the Rasch model mainly because of multidimensionality. The scale was found to contain a "physical" dimension and a "cognitive" dimension, consistent with the original subscale structure. Valid physical and cognitive subscales were derived after deletion of some items.
The MFIS cannot be used to generate a single overall score of fatigue. The conceptual interaction between the two dimensions remains unclear, which poses problems when interpreting change scores in these individual scales. Studies in which a global MFIS score was used as either an outcome measure or selection tool may need to be re-evaluated.
21 项修正疲劳影响量表(MFIS)已被推荐作为多发性硬化症的一种疗效衡量标准,通常用于生成疲劳的总体评分。
通过应用 Rasch 测量模型来检验 MFIS 总分的有效性。
MFIS 通过邮寄的方式发送给英国两个中心的临床确诊多发性硬化症患者。数据拟合 Rasch 模型。
分析基于 415 份记录(55%的回复率)。21 项量表主要由于多维性而不符合 Rasch 模型。该量表被发现包含“身体”维度和“认知”维度,与原始分量表结构一致。删除一些项目后,得出了有效的物理和认知分量表。
MFIS 不能用于生成疲劳的单一总体评分。两个维度之间的概念相互作用仍不清楚,这在解释这些单个量表的变化分数时带来了问题。作为疗效衡量标准或选择工具使用的全球 MFIS 评分的研究可能需要重新评估。