Department of Medical Entomology and Vector Control, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran.
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2011 Mar;11(3):201-7. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2009.0170. Epub 2010 Jun 29.
Tick-borne relapsing fever (TBRF) is endemic in Africa and Eurasia and attributed to different Borrelia species. In the Central Asia and Middle Eastern countries, TBRF is caused mainly by Borrelia persica; however, other Borrelia species such B. microtti, B. latyschewii, B. baltazardi, and B. caucasica have also been described. The classic taxonomy of Borrelia spp. is based on the cospeciation concept that is very complex and rather confusing. In this study, we report two DNA-based methods to discriminate B. persica and B. microtti, the two main prevalent species in the region. Molecular typing of the species was performed using (i) restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-amplified fragments of either 16S-rRNA or glpQ genes, and (ii) species-specific PCR of glpQ gene. Sequence analyses of the data obtained in this study indicate that the glpQ gene is more variable than 16S-rRNA (6.9% vs. 1.2%); thus glpQ is a more useful marker for discrimination of B. persica from B. microtti. The 16S-rRNA fragment comprises only one useful species-specific restriction site (TaqI), whereas the glpQ fragment includes several species-specific restriction sites and its digestion by DraI, TaqI, EcoRV, HinfI, or SspI results in distinctively different PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism patterns for the two species. Further, the species-specific primers amplified a 253-bp fragment for B. persica and a 451-bp one for B. microtti. Phylogenetic analysis of the data revealed that B. microtti and B. persica are associated to the African and new world RF agents, respectively. This study demonstrates that both typing methods are simple, sensitive, and fast, and that they allow one to differentiate between B. persica and B. microtti. This could prove that both methods are important and useful in monitoring of TBRF disease in endemic areas.
蜱传回归热(TBRF)在非洲和欧亚大陆流行,由不同的伯氏疏螺旋体引起。在中亚和中东国家,TBRF 主要由波斯疏螺旋体引起;然而,其他伯氏疏螺旋体,如微小球疏螺旋体、拉氏疏螺旋体、巴尔通体和高加索疏螺旋体,也已被描述。伯氏疏螺旋体的经典分类学基于共进化概念,非常复杂且令人困惑。在这项研究中,我们报告了两种基于 DNA 的方法来区分该地区两种主要流行的物种,即波斯疏螺旋体和微小球疏螺旋体。使用(i)16S-rRNA 或 glpQ 基因 PCR 扩增片段的限制性片段长度多态性分析,和(ii)glpQ 基因的种特异性 PCR 对物种进行分子分型。对本研究获得的数据进行序列分析表明,glpQ 基因比 16S-rRNA 更具变异性(6.9%对 1.2%);因此,glpQ 是区分波斯疏螺旋体和微小球疏螺旋体的更有用标记。16S-rRNA 片段仅包含一个有用的种特异性限制性位点(TaqI),而 glpQ 片段包含几个种特异性限制性位点,其消化 DraI、TaqI、EcoRV、HinfI 或 SspI 可导致两种物种的 PCR-限制性片段长度多态性模式明显不同。此外,种特异性引物扩增了 253-bp 片段用于波斯疏螺旋体,451-bp 片段用于微小球疏螺旋体。数据分析的系统发育分析表明,微小球疏螺旋体和波斯疏螺旋体分别与非洲和新世界 RF 因子有关。本研究表明,两种分型方法简单、敏感、快速,可区分波斯疏螺旋体和微小球疏螺旋体。这表明这两种方法在监测流行地区的 TBRF 疾病方面都很重要且有用。