Med Anthropol. 2010 Jul;29(3):217-25. doi: 10.1080/01459740.2010.490252.
When the World Bank publishes a report on climate change, the world takes notice. What are its diagnoses and treatments, and how present is anthropology in this analysis? The 2010 World Development Report on climate change provides few new diagnostic tools and no clear Bank policy revisions. It often fails to harmonize neoliberal development rhetoric with new climate-change imperatives. It nods to the importance of social context and risk perception yet refers primarily to behavioral economics and psychological constructs. Although anthropologists are documenting the local effects and human responses to larger-scale, climate-driven processes, our work is absent in the report. To play a role at global scale we would do well to learn more about concepts like nonlinearity and emergence, systems analysis, modeling, and disease dynamics. Our adroitness in developing metaphors and methods for crossing scale will make our efforts more visible and applicable.
当世界银行发布一份有关气候变化的报告时,全球都会关注。该报告的诊断和治疗方法是什么,以及人类学在这一分析中处于何种地位?2010 年世界发展报告有关气候变化的部分并未提供新的诊断工具,也没有明确的世行政策调整。它往往无法使新的气候变化要求与新自由主义发展言论相协调。它承认社会背景和风险感知的重要性,但主要提到行为经济学和心理结构。尽管人类学家正在记录地方影响和人类对更广泛的气候驱动过程的反应,但我们的工作在报告中却没有体现。为了在全球范围内发挥作用,我们应该更多地了解非线性和涌现、系统分析、建模和疾病动态等概念。我们在开发跨越尺度的隐喻和方法方面的熟练程度将使我们的工作更加明显和适用。