• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

退行性腰椎滑脱症伴椎管狭窄。一项比较单纯减压与减压加横突间融合术的前瞻性研究。

Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. A prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis.

作者信息

Herkowitz H N, Kurz L T

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991 Jul;73(6):802-8.

PMID:2071615
Abstract

Fifty patients who had spinal stenosis associated with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis were prospectively studied clinically and radiographically to determine if concomitant intertransverse-process arthrodesis provided better results than decompressive laminectomy alone. There were thirty-six women and fourteen men. The mean age of the twenty-five patients who had had an arthrodesis was 63.5 years and that of the twenty-five patients who had not had an arthrodesis, sixty-five years. The level of the operation was between the fourth and fifth lumbar vertebrae in forty-one patients and between the third and fourth lumbar vertebrae in nine patients. The patients were followed for a mean of three years (range, 2.4 to four years). In the patients who had had a concomitant arthrodesis, the results were significantly better with respect to relief of pain in the back and lower limbs.

摘要

对50例患有与退变性腰椎滑脱相关的椎管狭窄症患者进行了前瞻性的临床和影像学研究,以确定同时进行横突间融合术是否比单纯减压性椎板切除术能取得更好的效果。其中有36名女性和14名男性。接受融合术的25例患者的平均年龄为63.5岁,未接受融合术的25例患者的平均年龄为65岁。41例患者的手术节段在第四和第五腰椎之间,9例患者的手术节段在第三和第四腰椎之间。患者平均随访三年(范围为2.4至四年)。在同时进行融合术的患者中,背部和下肢疼痛缓解方面的效果明显更好。

相似文献

1
Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. A prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis.退行性腰椎滑脱症伴椎管狭窄。一项比较单纯减压与减压加横突间融合术的前瞻性研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991 Jul;73(6):802-8.
2
1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation.1997年沃尔沃临床研究奖获得者。退变性腰椎滑脱伴椎管狭窄:一项前瞻性随机研究,比较单纯减压椎板切除术和融合术(有无脊柱内固定)。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Dec 15;22(24):2807-12. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199712150-00003.
3
Dynamic stabilization in addition to decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis.除减压外,对伴有退行性腰椎滑脱的腰椎管狭窄症进行动态稳定治疗。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Feb 15;31(4):442-9. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000200092.49001.6e.
4
Minimum four-year follow-up of spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and dynamic stabilization.对接受减压和动态稳定治疗的退行性腰椎滑脱伴椎管狭窄患者进行至少四年的随访。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Aug 15;33(18):E636-42. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817d2435.
5
Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective long-term study comparing fusion and pseudarthrosis.退行性腰椎滑脱伴椎管狭窄:一项比较融合术和假关节形成的前瞻性长期研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Apr 1;29(7):726-33; discussion 733-4. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000119398.22620.92.
6
Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis, a prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis: a critical analysis.退变性腰椎滑脱症合并椎管狭窄:一项比较单纯减压与减压联合横突间融合术的前瞻性研究:批判性分析
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Feb 15;22(4):368-9. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199702150-00002.
7
Minimally invasive spinal decompression for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis and stenosis maintains stability and may avoid the need for fusion.微创脊柱减压术治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症和椎管狭窄症可维持稳定性,且可能避免融合手术的必要性。
Bone Joint J. 2018 Apr 1;100-B(4):499-506. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B4.BJJ-2017-0917.R1.
8
Laminectomy plus Fusion versus Laminectomy Alone for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.后路腰椎滑脱症的椎板切除术联合融合术与单纯椎板切除术的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 14;374(15):1424-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1508788.
9
Radiographic predictors of delayed instability following decompression without fusion for degenerative grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis.退行性腰椎Ⅰ度滑脱减压未融合术后迟发性不稳定的影像学预测因素。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Apr;18(4):340-6. doi: 10.3171/2013.1.SPINE12537. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
10
Degenerative spondylolisthesis does not affect the outcome of unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression in patients with lumbar stenosis.退变性腰椎滑脱并不影响腰椎管狭窄症患者行单侧椎板切开双侧减压术的疗效。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Mar 1;39(5):400-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000161.

引用本文的文献

1
Mapping the field of spondylolisthesis: A bibliometric analysis.腰椎滑脱症领域图谱:一项文献计量分析。
World J Clin Cases. 2025 Aug 6;13(22):99221. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i22.99221.
2
All Cause 5-Year Revision Rates of Patients with Surgically Treated Lumbar Stenosis with and Without Instrumented Arthrodesis.接受手术治疗的腰椎管狭窄症患者(有无器械辅助关节融合术)的全因5年翻修率。
Global Spine J. 2025 Jul 14:21925682251360656. doi: 10.1177/21925682251360656.
3
A narrative review and scoring proposal for secondary lumbar instability after lumbar decompression surgery.
腰椎减压术后继发性腰椎不稳的叙述性综述及评分建议
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2025 Jun 18;167(1):171. doi: 10.1007/s00701-025-06590-9.
4
Temporal Patterns of Risk Factors for Adjacent Segment Disease After Lumbar Fusion: 5 Years or More and up to 15 Years.腰椎融合术后相邻节段疾病危险因素的时间模式:5年及以上至15年
J Clin Med. 2025 May 13;14(10):3400. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103400.
5
Primary Versus Iatrogenic Spondylolisthesis: A Multi-Dimensional Comparison of Outcomes.原发性与医源性腰椎滑脱:结局的多维度比较
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 23;14(7):2193. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072193.
6
Motion attenuation surgery in the degenerative lumbar spine: Is cement discoplasty a safe and effective option?退变性腰椎的运动衰减手术:骨水泥椎间盘成形术是一种安全有效的选择吗?
Brain Spine. 2025 Mar 4;5:104220. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104220. eCollection 2025.
7
Decompression and fusion for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis is associated with higher early morbidity rates and risk of perioperative complications compared with decompression alone: a retrospective study in the United States.与单纯减压相比,腰椎退行性滑脱的减压融合术早期发病率更高,围手术期并发症风险更高:美国的一项回顾性研究
Asian Spine J. 2025 Jun;19(3):346-354. doi: 10.31616/asj.2024.0279. Epub 2025 Mar 4.
8
Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Full-Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Grade I Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Retrospective Study With a Minimum 1-Year Follow-up.I度退行性腰椎滑脱症伴腰椎管狭窄症全内镜减压术的临床及影像学结果:一项至少随访1年的回顾性研究
Neurosurg Pract. 2024 Jan 11;5(1):e00078. doi: 10.1227/neuprac.0000000000000078. eCollection 2024 Mar.
9
Comparative Outcomes of Biportal Endoscopic Decompression, Conventional Subtotal Laminectomy, and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Central Stenosis.双门内镜减压术、传统次全椎板切除术和微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗腰椎中央管狭窄症的比较结果
Neurospine. 2024 Dec;21(4):1178-1189. doi: 10.14245/ns.2448830.415. Epub 2024 Dec 31.
10
National Trends in Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis With Stenosis Treated With Fusion Versus Decompression.腰椎退行性椎体滑脱伴狭窄采用融合术与减压术治疗的全国趋势
Neurospine. 2024 Dec;21(4):1068-1077. doi: 10.14245/ns.2448624.312. Epub 2024 Dec 31.