Primatology Department, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, Leipzig 04103, Germany.
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Feb 7;278(1704):408-16. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1112. Epub 2010 Aug 18.
The question of whether animals possess 'cultures' or 'traditions' continues to generate widespread theoretical and empirical interest. Studies of wild chimpanzees have featured prominently in this discussion, as the dominant approach used to identify culture in wild animals was first applied to them. This procedure, the 'method of exclusion,' begins by documenting behavioural differences between groups and then infers the existence of culture by eliminating ecological explanations for their occurrence. The validity of this approach has been questioned because genetic differences between groups have not explicitly been ruled out as a factor contributing to between-group differences in behaviour. Here we investigate this issue directly by analysing genetic and behavioural data from nine groups of wild chimpanzees. We find that the overall levels of genetic and behavioural dissimilarity between groups are highly and statistically significantly correlated. Additional analyses show that only a very small number of behaviours vary between genetically similar groups, and that there is no obvious pattern as to which classes of behaviours (e.g. tool-use versus communicative) have a distribution that matches patterns of between-group genetic dissimilarity. These results indicate that genetic dissimilarity cannot be eliminated as playing a major role in generating group differences in chimpanzee behaviour.
动物是否具有“文化”或“传统”的问题继续引起广泛的理论和实证兴趣。对野生黑猩猩的研究在这一讨论中占有突出地位,因为最初应用于野生动物的识别文化的主要方法是首先应用于它们。这种方法,即“排除法”,首先记录群体之间的行为差异,然后通过排除其发生的生态解释来推断文化的存在。这种方法的有效性一直受到质疑,因为群体之间的遗传差异并没有被明确排除为导致群体之间行为差异的因素。在这里,我们通过分析来自九个野生黑猩猩群体的遗传和行为数据直接研究这个问题。我们发现,群体之间遗传和行为差异的总体水平高度且具有统计学显著相关性。进一步的分析表明,只有极少数行为在遗传相似的群体之间存在差异,而且没有明显的模式表明哪些行为类别(例如使用工具与交流)的分布与群体之间遗传差异的模式相匹配。这些结果表明,遗传差异不能被排除为导致黑猩猩行为群体差异的主要因素。