Suppr超能文献

前交叉韧带损伤机制的“飞机”解释:系统评价。

A 'plane' explanation of anterior cruciate ligament injury mechanisms: a systematic review.

机构信息

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Research Foundation, Sports Medicine Biodynamics Center and Human Performance Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, USA.

出版信息

Sports Med. 2010 Sep 1;40(9):729-46. doi: 10.2165/11534950-000000000-00000.

Abstract

Although intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury have been explored extensively, the factors surrounding the inciting event and the biomechanical mechanisms underlying ACL injury remain elusive. This systematic review summarizes all the relevant data and clarifies the strengths and weaknesses of the literature regarding ACL injury mechanisms. The hypothesis is that most ACL injuries do not occur via solely sagittal, frontal or transverse plane mechanisms. Electronic database literature searches of PubMed MEDLINE (1966-2008), CINAHL (1982-2008) and SportDiscus (1985-2008) were used for the systematic review to identify any studies in the literature that examined ACL injury mechanisms. Methodological approaches that describe and evaluate ACL injury mechanisms included athlete interviews, arthroscopic studies, clinical imaging and physical exam tests, video analysis, cadaveric studies, laboratory tests (motion analysis, electromyography) and mathematical modelling studies. One hundred and ninety-eight studies associated with ACL injury mechanisms were identified and provided evidence regarding plane of injury, with evidence supporting sagittal, frontal and/or transverse plane mechanisms of injury. Collectively, the studies indicate that it is highly probable that ACL injuries are more likely to occur during multi-planar rather than single-planar mechanisms of injury.

摘要

虽然已经广泛探讨了前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤的内在和外在风险因素,但围绕触发事件的因素以及 ACL 损伤的生物力学机制仍然难以捉摸。本系统评价总结了所有相关数据,并阐明了有关 ACL 损伤机制的文献的优缺点。假设是,大多数 ACL 损伤并非仅通过矢状面、额状面或横断平面机制发生。为了进行系统评价,使用了电子数据库文献检索 PubMed MEDLINE(1966-2008 年)、CINAHL(1982-2008 年)和 SportDiscus(1985-2008 年),以确定文献中任何检查 ACL 损伤机制的研究。描述和评估 ACL 损伤机制的方法学方法包括运动员访谈、关节镜研究、临床影像学和体格检查测试、视频分析、尸体研究、实验室测试(运动分析、肌电图)和数学建模研究。确定了 198 项与 ACL 损伤机制相关的研究,并提供了有关损伤平面的证据,支持损伤的矢状面、额状面和/或横断平面机制。总的来说,这些研究表明,ACL 损伤更可能发生在多平面而不是单一平面的损伤机制中,这是极有可能的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验