• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哮喘和 COPD 医师实践评估问卷。

The Physicians' Practice Assessment Questionnaire on asthma and COPD.

机构信息

Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, Université Laval, 2725 Chemin Sainte-Foy, Québec, QC, Canada G1V 4G5.

出版信息

Respir Med. 2011 Jan;105(1):8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2010.07.022. Epub 2010 Aug 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.rmed.2010.07.022
PMID:20797841
Abstract

We describe a new tool, the Physicians' Practice Assessment Questionnaire (PPAQ), designed for the global self-assessment of implementation of asthma and COPD guidelines, as determined by the percentage of patients in whom physicians estimate that they implement guidelines key recommendations. Some of its properties were assessed by a group of 47 general practitioners (GPs), and test-retest data were obtained in repeating the questionnaire at a 5-week interval without intervention in a sub-group of 28 practitioners. Answers to the various questions were globally reproducible. The lowest scores (recommendations implemented in less than 50% of their patients) were: 1) for both asthma and COPD: referral for patient education, provision of a written action plan and regular assessment of inhaler technique, 2) for asthma: referral to a specialist for difficult to control asthma or uncertain diagnosis, and 3) for COPD: assessment of lung function and disability according to specific criteria and referral to a rehabilitation program. The analysis showed sufficient internal consistency for both questionnaires (Cronbach alphas 0.7617 for asthma and 0.8317 for COPD). Pearson's correlations indicated good test-retest (r = 0.6421, p = 0.0002 for asthma; r = 0.6801, p < 0.0001 for COPD). In conclusion, the PPAQ is a new tool to assess implementation of asthma and COPD guidelines; it has the potential to identify care gaps that can be specifically targeted for intervention.

摘要

我们描述了一种新工具,即医生实践评估问卷(PPAQ),旨在通过医生估计他们实施指南关键建议的患者比例,对全球范围内的哮喘和 COPD 指南实施情况进行自我评估。该问卷的一些特性由 47 名全科医生(GP)进行了评估,并在没有干预的情况下,对 28 名医生中的亚组进行了 5 周间隔的重复问卷调查,获得了测试 - 重测数据。各种问题的答案具有全球可重复性。得分最低(在不到 50%的患者中实施的建议)的是:1)哮喘和 COPD 均:将患者转介进行教育、提供书面行动计划和定期评估吸入器技术,2)哮喘:将难以控制的哮喘或诊断不确定的患者转介给专家,3)COPD:根据特定标准评估肺功能和残疾,并将患者转介到康复计划。分析表明两个问卷都具有足够的内部一致性(哮喘问卷的 Cronbach α 为 0.7617,COPD 问卷为 0.8317)。Pearson 相关分析表明测试 - 重测结果良好(哮喘 r = 0.6421,p = 0.0002;COPD r = 0.6801,p < 0.0001)。总之,PPAQ 是一种评估哮喘和 COPD 指南实施情况的新工具;它有可能确定可以针对性干预的护理差距。

相似文献

1
The Physicians' Practice Assessment Questionnaire on asthma and COPD.哮喘和 COPD 医师实践评估问卷。
Respir Med. 2011 Jan;105(1):8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2010.07.022. Epub 2010 Aug 24.
2
Referral and consultation in asthma and COPD: an exploration of pulmonologists' views.哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病的转诊与会诊:对肺科医生观点的探讨
Neth J Med. 2003 Mar;61(3):71-81.
3
Improving in-office discussion of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: results and recommendations from an in-office linguistic study in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.改善慢性阻塞性肺疾病的门诊讨论:一项慢性阻塞性肺疾病门诊语言研究的结果与建议
Am J Med. 2007 Aug;120(8 Suppl 1):S28-32. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2007.04.010.
4
Patterns of care for COPD by Japanese physicians.日本医生对慢性阻塞性肺疾病的治疗模式。
Respirology. 2005 Jun;10(3):341-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2005.00717.x.
5
Continuing to Confront COPD International Physician Survey: physician knowledge and application of COPD management guidelines in 12 countries.持续应对慢性阻塞性肺疾病国际医师调查:12个国家医师对慢性阻塞性肺疾病管理指南的认知与应用
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2014 Dec 30;10:39-55. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S70162. eCollection 2015.
6
Self-reported physician practices for children with asthma: are national guidelines followed?针对哮喘儿童的自我报告的医生诊疗行为:是否遵循了国家指南?
Pediatrics. 2000 Oct;106(4 Suppl):886-96.
7
Global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: GOLD opportunity for lung disorders.慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议:慢性阻塞性肺疾病的黄金机遇与肺部疾病。
Prev Med. 2005 Mar;40(3):274-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.06.010.
8
What general practitioners and paediatricians think about their patients' asthma.全科医生和儿科医生对其患者哮喘的看法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Nov;59(2):182-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.11.004. Epub 2004 Dec 16.
9
Comparison of indicators assessing the quality of drug prescribing for asthma.评估哮喘药物处方质量的指标比较。
Health Serv Res. 2001 Apr;36(1 Pt 1):143-61.
10
Do family physicians' records fit guideline diagnosed COPD?家庭医生的记录是否符合慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的指南诊断?
Fam Pract. 2009 Apr;26(2):81-7. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmp005. Epub 2009 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
A study on physicians' knowledge and practices of asthma management in Angola.安哥拉医生对哮喘管理的知识与实践研究。
Multidiscip Respir Med. 2024 Sep 13;19(1):968. doi: 10.5826/mrm.2024.968.
2
Emerging Roles of Malaysian Pharmacists in Asthma Management Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Narrative Review.新冠疫情期间马来西亚药剂师在哮喘管理中的新角色:叙事性综述
Malays J Med Sci. 2023 Aug;30(4):33-47. doi: 10.21315/mjms2023.30.4.4. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
3
Physicians' Knowledge and Practices Regarding Asthma: A Cross-Sectional Study in Saudi Arabia.
医生对哮喘的认知与实践:沙特阿拉伯的一项横断面研究。
Int J Gen Med. 2022 Aug 19;15:6671-6680. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S369306. eCollection 2022.
4
Physicians' Knowledge and Practices Regarding Asthma in Jordan: A Cross-Sectional Study.医生在约旦对哮喘的认知和实践:一项横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2021 Aug 31;9:712255. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.712255. eCollection 2021.
5
Continuing professional education for general practitioners on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: feasibility of a blended learning approach in Bangladesh.孟加拉国针对全科医生开展慢性阻塞性肺疾病继续教育:混合学习方法的可行性。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Sep 28;21(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01270-2.
6
Primary care clinician adherence with asthma guidelines: the National Asthma Survey of Physicians.基层医疗临床医生对哮喘指南的遵循情况:全国医师哮喘调查
J Asthma. 2020 May;57(5):543-555. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2019.1579831. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
7
A multi-stakeholder perspective on asthma care in Canada: findings from a mixed methods needs assessment in the treatment and management of asthma in adults.加拿大哮喘护理的多利益相关者视角:成人哮喘治疗与管理中混合方法需求评估的结果
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2018 Sep 10;14:36. doi: 10.1186/s13223-018-0261-x. eCollection 2018.
8
Clinician Agreement, Self-Efficacy, and Adherence with the Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma.临床医生的一致性、自我效能感和对哮喘诊断和管理指南的遵循情况。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 May-Jun;6(3):886-894.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.01.018. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
9
What patients really think about asthma guidelines: barriers to guideline implementation from the patients' perspective.患者对哮喘指南的真实看法:从患者角度看指南实施的障碍
BMC Pulm Med. 2017 Jan 11;17(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12890-016-0346-6.
10
Identifying patients with asthma in primary care electronic medical record systems Chart analysis-based electronic algorithm validation study.在基层医疗电子病历系统中识别哮喘患者:基于图表分析的电子算法验证研究
Can Fam Physician. 2015 Oct;61(10):e474-83.