Buehler Center on Aging, Health and Society, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 750 N, Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
BMC Med. 2010 Oct 8;8:57. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-57.
Decision making is a complex process and it is particularly challenging to make decisions with, or for, patients who are near the end of their life. Some of those challenges will not be resolved - due to our human inability to foresee the future precisely and the human proclivity to change stated preferences when faced with reality. Other challenges of the decision-making process are manageable. This commentary offers a set of approaches which may lead to progress in this field. One clearly desirable approach can and should be used more often than it is: the routine inclusion of discussions about the goals of care and documentation with all patients who have a poor prognosis. The match between a patient's goals and the care received should be the gold standard for quality palliative care.Planning for future situations is necessary but hard. In order to achieve efficient elicitation and documentation of advance care planning, research is needed on each individual's thresholds for transitioning from curative to palliative intent and on the trajectory of changed preferences when illness occurs. Another clearly desirable approach is the documentation and use of community preferences, so that proxies making decisions without guidance from the patient can at least know what the majority of people considering similar situations chose to do.Part of the challenge of achieving 'quality dying' may have to do with the still current (mainly Western) tendency to a death-denying culture and the inability of dying people to enter into the dying role. Awareness of the tasks of the dying role and the provision of time and space for those tasks during the delivery of medical care is essential. Medicine needs to continue to enhance the existential maturity of our profession, our patients and the cultures in which we practice. This state of mind should provide for decisions made with a more settled acceptance of mortality and with more awareness of the necessary connection to our survivors and next generation that mortality creates. Specific interventions, such as Dignity Therapy and advance care planning, may aid this state of mind.
决策是一个复杂的过程,尤其对于生命末期的患者或为其做决策,更是极具挑战。有些挑战无法解决——这是由于人类无法精确预见未来,以及人类在面对现实时改变既定偏好的倾向。决策过程中的其他挑战是可以应对的。本评论提出了一系列方法,可能有助于该领域取得进展。有一种明确可取的方法可以而且应该比现在更经常使用:即对所有预后不佳的患者进行常规的护理目标讨论和记录。患者的目标与所接受的护理之间的匹配应成为高质量姑息治疗的金标准。规划未来的情况是必要的,但也很困难。为了实现前瞻性护理计划的有效征集和记录,需要对每个人从治愈意图过渡到姑息意图的阈值以及患病时偏好改变的轨迹进行研究。另一种明确可取的方法是记录和使用社区偏好,以便在没有患者指导的情况下做出决策的代理人至少可以知道考虑类似情况的大多数人选择了什么。实现“高质量死亡”的部分挑战可能与当前(主要是西方)的死亡否认文化倾向以及临终者无法进入临终角色有关。意识到临终角色的任务以及在提供医疗保健时为这些任务提供时间和空间是至关重要的。医学需要继续提高我们专业、患者和我们实践所在文化的存在成熟度。这种心态应该有助于在更加接受死亡的情况下做出决策,并更加意识到与我们的幸存者和下一代之间的必要联系,因为死亡创造了这种联系。尊严疗法和前瞻性护理计划等具体干预措施可能有助于这种心态。