Kawahara M
Hiroshima University Dental Hospital, Japan.
Anesth Prog. 1990 Sep-Oct;37(5):244-7.
Non-invasive automatic blood pressure monitors (BP-103N, DINAMAP 845XT, Finapres 2300) were compared with the auscultatory method. The blood pressure readings given by the oscillometric method (BP-103N, DINAMAP 845XT) were accurate and reproducible. Agreement with the auscultatory method was especially good for systolic pressure. For diastolic pressure readings, there was less agreement with the results of the auscultatory method. The finger arterial pressure method (Finapres 2300) occasionally displayed greater variability than the devices using the oscillometric method.
将无创自动血压监测仪(BP - 103N、DINAMAP 845XT、Finapres 2300)与听诊法进行了比较。示波法(BP - 103N、DINAMAP 845XT)测得的血压读数准确且可重复。与听诊法的一致性在收缩压方面尤为良好。对于舒张压读数,与听诊法结果的一致性较差。手指动脉压法(Finapres 2300)偶尔显示出比使用示波法的设备更大的变异性。