Ling J, Ohara Y, Orime Y, Noon G P, Takatani S
Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
J Clin Monit. 1995 Mar;11(2):123-30. doi: 10.1007/BF01617734.
A noninvasive blood pressure monitor (model BP8800MS, Colin Medical Instruments Corp., San Antonio, TX) that uses the oscillometric principle was evaluated against the manual auscultatory method in 85 adults and 85 children following the requirements of the 1992 AAMI SP-10 standard. This was the first evaluation study of the electronic sphygmomanometers according to the new AAMI standards.
In adult subjects, the mean difference and standard deviation of the differences between the oscillometric and auscultatory methods were 2.81 +/- 5.35 mm Hg (mean +/- SD) for systolic and 0.04 +/- 4.90 mm Hg for diastolic; in children, they were 3.18 +/- 5.96 mm Hg for systolic and -0.82 +/- 5.24 mm Hg for diastolic. Excellent correlation between the oscillometric and auscultatory methods, particularly the diastolic pressure, is due to usage of the Phase V Korotkoff's sounds for auscultatory detection of the diastolic pressure, increased accuracy of the two observers' measurements, and proper selection of cuff sizes depending on the mid-arm circumference. Five different-sized cuffs were used in this study. The cuff-width-to-midarm circumference ratio was adjusted to be 0.4 or larger to minimize the measurement error associated with mismatch of cuff-size/arm-size relationship. The distribution of errors associated with each cuff was nearly the same.
The 1992 AAMI SP-10 standards offer a thorough evaluation of the oscillometric sphygmomanometer by enforcing more stringent criteria on (1) agreement between two observers, (2) wide spectrum of blood pressure from hypertensive (above 180 mm Hg) to hypotensive, and (3) data analysis. The oscillometric blood pressure monitor evaluated in this study meets the specifications of the new AAMI SP-10 standards and can offer an accurate, automatic, and noninvasive measure of both systolic and diastolic blood pressure in adults and children. It can safely replace the manual or automatic auscultatory system in various clinical settings.
按照1992年美国医疗器械促进协会(AAMI)SP - 10标准的要求,对一款采用示波法原理的无创血压监测仪(BP8800MS型号,科林医疗仪器公司,得克萨斯州圣安东尼奥)与人工听诊法进行了对比评估,涉及85名成人和85名儿童。这是依据新的AAMI标准对电子血压计进行的首次评估研究。
在成年受试者中,示波法与听诊法收缩压的平均差值及差值标准差为2.81±5.35毫米汞柱(均值±标准差),舒张压为0.04±4.90毫米汞柱;在儿童中,收缩压为3.18±5.96毫米汞柱,舒张压为 - 0.82±5.24毫米汞柱。示波法与听诊法之间具有良好的相关性,尤其是舒张压,这归因于采用柯氏音第V相听诊检测舒张压、两位观察者测量准确性的提高以及根据上臂中部周长正确选择袖带尺寸。本研究使用了五种不同尺寸的袖带。袖带宽度与上臂中部周长的比值调整为0.4或更大,以尽量减少因袖带尺寸与手臂尺寸不匹配而产生的测量误差。与每个袖带相关的误差分布几乎相同。
1992年AAMI SP - 10标准通过对(1)两位观察者之间的一致性、(2)从高血压(高于180毫米汞柱)到低血压的广泛血压范围以及(3)数据分析实施更严格的标准,对示波血压计进行了全面评估。本研究中评估的示波血压监测仪符合新的AAMI SP - 10标准的规范,能够为成人和儿童提供准确、自动且无创的收缩压和舒张压测量。在各种临床环境中,它可以安全地替代人工或自动听诊系统。