Department of Health and Behavior Studies, Teachers College Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Addiction. 2011 Feb;106(2):410-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03172.x. Epub 2010 Nov 4.
This study investigated whether Pavlovian extinction occurs during smoking cessation by determining whether experience abstaining from smoking in the presence of cigarette cues leads to decreased probability of lapsing and whether this effect is mediated by craving.
Secondary analyses were carried out with data sets from two studies with correlational/observational designs.
Data were collected in smokers' natural environments using ecological momentary assessment techniques.
Sixty-one and 207 smokers who were attempting cessation participated.
Multi-level path models were used to examine effects of prior experience abstaining in the presence of available cigarettes and while others were smoking on subsequent craving intensity and the probability of lapsing. Control variables included current cigarette availability, current exposure to others smoking, number of prior lapses and time in the study.
Both currently available cigarettes [odds ratios (OR) = 36.60, 11.59] and the current presence of other smoking (OR = 5.00, 1.52) were powerful predictors of smoking lapse. Repeated exposure to available cigarettes without smoking was associated with a significantly lower probability of lapse in subsequent episodes (OR = 0.44, 0.52). However, exposure to others smoking was not a reliable predictor, being significant only in the smaller study (OR = 0.30). Craving functioned as a mediator between extinction of available cigarettes and lapsing only in the smaller study and was not a mediator for extinction of others smoking in either study.
This study showed that exposure to available cigarettes is a large risk factor for lapsing, but that this risk can also be reduced over time by repeated exposures without smoking. Smoking cessation interventions should attempt to reduce cigarette exposure (by training cigarette avoidance) but recognize the potential advantage of unreinforced exposure to available cigarettes.
本研究通过确定在香烟线索存在的情况下,戒烟期间是否会发生巴甫洛夫式消退,以及这种效应是否受渴望感的影响,来研究在戒烟期间是否会发生巴甫洛夫式消退。
采用具有相关/观察设计的两项研究的数据集进行二次分析。
使用生态瞬时评估技术在吸烟者的自然环境中收集数据。
61 名和 207 名试图戒烟的吸烟者参与了研究。
使用多层次路径模型来检验先前在有可用香烟和他人吸烟时的戒烟经历对随后的渴望强度和复吸概率的影响。控制变量包括当前香烟的可获得性、当前接触他人吸烟的情况、先前复吸的次数和研究时间。
当前可用香烟(优势比[OR] = 36.60,11.59)和当前他人吸烟的存在(OR = 5.00,1.52)都是吸烟复吸的有力预测因素。反复暴露于可获得的香烟而不吸烟与随后发作中复吸的可能性显著降低相关(OR = 0.44,0.52)。然而,接触他人吸烟并不是一个可靠的预测因素,仅在较小的研究中具有统计学意义(OR = 0.30)。只有在较小的研究中,渴望感才是可获得香烟消退与复吸之间的中介,而在两个研究中,渴望感都不是他人吸烟消退的中介。
本研究表明,接触可获得的香烟是复吸的一个重要危险因素,但通过反复暴露于无吸烟的香烟,这种风险也可以随着时间的推移而降低。戒烟干预措施应试图减少香烟暴露(通过训练避免吸烟),但也应认识到接触可获得香烟而不受奖励的潜在优势。