• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随机对照干预试验中结直肠癌筛查的行为中介因素。

Behavioral mediators of colorectal cancer screening in a randomized controlled intervention trial.

机构信息

School of Public Health, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-6900, USA.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2011 Feb;52(2):167-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.11.007. Epub 2010 Nov 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.11.007
PMID:21111754
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3075444/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Understanding mediators for behavioral change is important for the optimization of intervention strategies. This report examines mediators of change in the context of a randomized controlled intervention trial (Los Angeles, 2004-2009) that successfully increased colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among Filipino Americans.

METHODS

The intervention, based on the Health Behavior Framework, targeted knowledge/awareness of CRC screening, communication with health care provider, health beliefs, social support and barriers to CRC screening. Health Behavior Framework variables were assessed at baseline and 6-month follow-up (N=432). Variables targeted for change were tested as potential mediators of the primary outcome, self-reported receipt of CRC screening during the follow-up period, which was previously found to have increased significantly among intervention participants.

RESULTS

Consistent with the Health Behavior Framework, knowledge/awareness of CRC screening and patient-provider communication mediated receipt of screening. Increase in knowledge/awareness of CRC screening accounted for 13% (95% confidence interval 2%-24%) of the total intervention effect size, while patient-provider communication accounted for 20% (5%-36%). Combined, these two variables accounted for 28% (10%-46%) of the total effect size.

CONCLUSION

Examining the roles of potential mediators in intervention trials may help identify constructs to target in order to enhance the effectiveness of interventions to increase screening.

摘要

背景

了解行为改变的中介因素对于优化干预策略非常重要。本报告考察了在一项成功提高菲律宾裔美国人结直肠癌(CRC)筛查率的随机对照干预试验(2004-2009 年,洛杉矶)背景下的变化中介因素。

方法

该干预措施基于健康行为框架,针对 CRC 筛查的知识/意识、与医疗保健提供者的沟通、健康信念、社会支持和 CRC 筛查障碍。在基线和 6 个月随访时评估健康行为框架变量(N=432)。针对变化的变量被测试为主要结果(自我报告在随访期间接受 CRC 筛查)的潜在中介因素,先前发现干预组中该结果显著增加。

结果

与健康行为框架一致,CRC 筛查知识/意识和医患沟通介导了筛查的接受。CRC 筛查知识/意识的增加占干预效果大小的 13%(95%置信区间 2%-24%),而医患沟通占 20%(5%-36%)。这两个变量加起来占总效果大小的 28%(10%-46%)。

结论

在干预试验中检查潜在中介因素的作用,可能有助于确定要针对的构建模块,以提高增加筛查的干预措施的有效性。

相似文献

1
Behavioral mediators of colorectal cancer screening in a randomized controlled intervention trial.随机对照干预试验中结直肠癌筛查的行为中介因素。
Prev Med. 2011 Feb;52(2):167-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.11.007. Epub 2010 Nov 25.
2
Results of a lay health education intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening among Filipino Americans: A cluster randomized controlled trial.一项针对菲律宾裔美国人增加结直肠癌筛查的大众健康教育干预的结果:一项整群随机对照试验。
Cancer. 2018 Apr 1;124 Suppl 7:1535-1542. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31116.
3
Knowledge of colorectal cancer screening guidelines and intention to obtain screening among nonadherent Filipino, Hmong, and Korean Americans.结直肠癌筛查指南知识与菲律宾裔、苗族和韩裔美国人接受筛查的意向。
Cancer. 2018 Apr 1;124 Suppl 7(Suppl 7):1560-1567. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31097.
4
Colorectal cancer beliefs, knowledge, and screening among Filipino, Hmong, and Korean Americans.美籍菲律宾人、苗族和韩国人对大肠癌的信念、知识和筛查情况。
Cancer. 2018 Apr 1;124 Suppl 7(Suppl 7):1552-1559. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31216.
5
Results of a community-based randomized trial to increase colorectal cancer screening among Filipino Americans.基于社区的菲律宾裔美国人结直肠癌筛查随机试验结果。
Am J Public Health. 2010 Nov;100(11):2228-34. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.176230. Epub 2010 Sep 23.
6
Comparing the effect of a decision aid plus patient navigation with usual care on colorectal cancer screening completion in vulnerable populations: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.比较决策辅助工具加患者导航与常规护理对弱势群体结直肠癌筛查完成情况的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2014 Jul 8;15:275. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-275.
7
Examining the Durability of Colorectal Cancer Screening Awareness and Health Beliefs Among Medically Underserved Patients: Baseline to 12 months Post-Intervention.考察医疗服务不足患者对结直肠癌筛查的认知及健康信念的持久性:干预前基线至干预后12个月
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Apr;34(2):297-303. doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1301-9.
8
Computer-tailored intervention increases colorectal cancer screening among low-income African Americans in primary care: Results of a randomized trial.计算机定制干预措施提高了初级保健中低收入非裔美国人的结直肠癌筛查率:一项随机试验的结果。
Prev Med. 2021 Apr;145:106449. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106449. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
9
The Effectiveness of a Physician-Only and Physician-Patient Intervention on Colorectal Cancer Screening Discussions Between Providers and African American and Latino Patients.仅医生参与及医生-患者共同参与的干预措施对医疗服务提供者与非裔美国人和拉丁裔患者之间结直肠癌筛查讨论的有效性。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Dec;30(12):1780-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3381-8. Epub 2015 May 19.
10
Examining the challenges of family recruitment to behavioral intervention trials: factors associated with participation and enrollment in a multi-state colonoscopy intervention trial.考察家庭招募参与行为干预试验的挑战:与多州结肠镜检查干预试验参与和入组相关的因素。
Trials. 2013 Apr 30;14:116. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-116.

引用本文的文献

1
eHealth literacy and cancer screening attitudes among chronic patients.慢性病患者的电子健康素养与癌症筛查态度
Sci Rep. 2025 May 29;15(1):18877. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03595-3.
2
A Community-Based Cervical Cancer Education and Navigation Program for Korean American Women.一项针对韩裔美国女性的基于社区的宫颈癌教育与导航项目。
Asian Am J Psychol. 2024 Sep;15(3):196-204. doi: 10.1037/aap0000324.
3
Scoping Review of Interventional Studies in Chronic Disease for Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, and Filipino Populations in the United States.美国本土夏威夷人、太平洋岛民和菲律宾裔人群中慢性疾病干预研究的范围综述。
Hawaii J Health Soc Welf. 2023 Oct;82(10 Suppl 1):58-66.
4
Comparative Effectiveness of 2 Interventions to Increase Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Women in the Rural US: A Randomized Clinical Trial.美国农村地区提高女性乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查率的 2 种干预措施的效果比较:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Apr 3;6(4):e2311004. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.11004.
5
Mediators of screening uptake in a colorectal cancer screening intervention among Hispanics.西班牙语裔人群结直肠癌筛查干预中筛查参与的中介因素。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Jan 5;22(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-09092-w.
6
Changes in colorectal cancer knowledge and screening intention among Ohio African American and Appalachian participants: The screen to save initiative.俄亥俄州非裔美国人和阿巴拉契亚参与者的结直肠癌知识和筛查意愿变化:“Screen to Save”倡议。
Cancer Causes Control. 2021 Oct;32(10):1149-1159. doi: 10.1007/s10552-021-01462-w. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
7
Computer-tailored intervention increases colorectal cancer screening among low-income African Americans in primary care: Results of a randomized trial.计算机定制干预措施提高了初级保健中低收入非裔美国人的结直肠癌筛查率:一项随机试验的结果。
Prev Med. 2021 Apr;145:106449. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106449. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
8
Effect of Text Messaging on Bowel Preparation and Appointment Attendance for Outpatient Colonoscopy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.短信对门诊结肠镜检查肠道准备及预约就诊的影响:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2034553. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.34553.
9
Factors associated with colorectal cancer screening in a peer-counseling intervention study in partnership with African American churches.在一项与非裔美国教会合作开展的同伴咨询干预研究中,与结直肠癌筛查相关的因素。
Prev Med Rep. 2020 Dec 8;20:101280. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101280. eCollection 2020 Dec.
10
Cancer-related Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviors within the Latino Faith Community in South Los Angeles.南洛杉矶拉丁裔信仰社区的癌症相关知识、态度和行为。
Ethn Dis. 2019 Apr 18;29(2):239-246. doi: 10.18865/ed.29.2.239. eCollection 2019 Spring.

本文引用的文献

1
Direct and indirect effects in a logit model.逻辑回归模型中的直接和间接效应。
Stata J. 2010 Winter;10(1):11-29.
2
Results of a community-based randomized trial to increase colorectal cancer screening among Filipino Americans.基于社区的菲律宾裔美国人结直肠癌筛查随机试验结果。
Am J Public Health. 2010 Nov;100(11):2228-34. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.176230. Epub 2010 Sep 23.
3
Current Directions in Mediation Analysis.中介分析的当前发展方向。
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2009 Feb 1;18(1):16. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01598.x.
4
Social cognitive mediators of change in a group randomized nutrition and physical activity intervention: social support, self-efficacy, outcome expectations and self-regulation in the guide-to-health trial.群组随机营养和身体活动干预中变化的社会认知中介:健康指南试验中的社会支持、自我效能、结果预期和自我调节。
J Health Psychol. 2010 Jan;15(1):21-32. doi: 10.1177/1359105309342297.
5
Integrating theory into community interventions to reduce liver cancer disparities: The Health Behavior Framework.将理论融入社区干预措施以减少肝癌差异:健康行为框架。
Prev Med. 2010 Jan-Feb;50(1-2):63-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.08.010. Epub 2009 Aug 27.
6
Understanding the barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening among low income immigrant hispanics.了解低收入移民西班牙裔人群中结直肠癌筛查的障碍和促进因素。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2010 Aug;12(4):462-9. doi: 10.1007/s10903-009-9274-3.
7
Colorectal cancer screening in Vietnamese Americans.美籍越南人的结直肠癌筛查
J Cancer Educ. 2008 Jan-Mar;23(1):37-45. doi: 10.1080/08858190701849395.
8
How and for whom? Mediation and moderation in health psychology.如何以及为谁?健康心理学中的中介作用与调节作用。
Health Psychol. 2008 Mar;27(2S):S99-S100. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.27.2(Suppl.).S99.
9
Predictors of colorectal cancer screening behaviors among average-risk older adults in the United States.美国一般风险老年成年人结直肠癌筛查行为的预测因素。
Cancer Causes Control. 2008 May;19(4):339-59. doi: 10.1007/s10552-007-9100-y. Epub 2007 Dec 18.
10
Promoting culturally appropriate colorectal cancer screening through a health educator: a randomized controlled trial.通过健康教育工作者促进符合文化背景的结直肠癌筛查:一项随机对照试验。
Cancer. 2006 Sep 1;107(5):959-66. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22091.