Department of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd., MEB 4550, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Sep;23(9):2376-86. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21596. Epub 2010 Dec 2.
The role of sensory-motor systems in conceptual understanding has been controversial. It has been proposed that many abstract concepts are understood metaphorically through concrete sensory-motor domains such as actions. Using fMRI, we compared neural responses with literal action (Lit; The daughter grasped the flowers), metaphoric action (Met; The public grasped the idea), and abstract (Abs; The public understood the idea) sentences of varying familiarity. Both Lit and Met sentences activated the left anterior inferior parietal lobule, an area involved in action planning, with Met sentences also activating a homologous area in the right hemisphere, relative to Abs sentences. Both Met and Abs sentences activated the left superior temporal regions associated with abstract language. Importantly, activation in primary motor and biological motion perception regions was inversely correlated with Lit and Met familiarity. These results support the view that the understanding of metaphoric action retains a link to sensory-motor systems involved in action performance. However, the involvement of sensory-motor systems in metaphor understanding changes through a gradual abstraction process whereby relatively detailed simulations are used for understanding unfamiliar metaphors, and these simulations become less detailed and involve only secondary motor regions as familiarity increases. Consistent with these data, we propose that anterior inferior parietal lobule serves as an interface between sensory-motor and conceptual systems and plays an important role in both domains. The similarity of abstract and metaphoric sentences in the activation of left superior temporal regions suggests that action metaphor understanding is not completely based on sensory-motor simulations but relies also on abstract lexical-semantic codes.
感觉运动系统在概念理解中的作用一直存在争议。有人提出,许多抽象概念是通过具体的感觉运动领域(如动作)来隐喻性地理解的。我们使用 fMRI 比较了字面动作( Lit;女儿抓住了花朵)、隐喻动作( Met;公众抓住了这个想法)和不同熟悉度的抽象( Abs;公众理解了这个想法)句子的神经反应。 Lit 和 Met 句子都激活了左前下顶叶,这是一个与动作规划有关的区域,而 Met 句子相对于 Abs 句子也激活了右半球的同源区域。 Met 和 Abs 句子都激活了与抽象语言相关的左颞上区域。重要的是,初级运动和生物运动知觉区域的激活与 Lit 和 Met 的熟悉度呈负相关。这些结果支持了这样一种观点,即隐喻动作的理解仍然与参与动作表现的感觉运动系统有关。然而,感觉运动系统在隐喻理解中的参与通过一个逐渐抽象的过程发生变化,在这个过程中,相对详细的模拟被用于理解不熟悉的隐喻,并且这些模拟变得不那么详细,并且只涉及次要的运动区域,随着熟悉度的增加。与这些数据一致,我们提出,前下顶叶作为感觉运动和概念系统之间的接口,在这两个领域都起着重要作用。左颞上区域激活的抽象和隐喻句子的相似性表明,动作隐喻理解不是完全基于感觉运动模拟,而是依赖于抽象的词汇语义代码。