Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, St. Paul's Hospital, and School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Jan;72(2):185-92. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.10.026. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
The objective of this study is to review current measurement issues and valuation methods such as "human capital" and "friction cost" for estimating productivity loss due to illness. Since observed wages diverge from marginal productivity when allowances are made for sick days and workers are risk averse, or when a job type involves team production, unavailability of perfect substitutes, and/or time-sensitivity of output, productivity loss is likely to be underestimated. A multiplier adjusting wage to marginal productivity needs to be developed for practical use. We further consider the ramifications of measuring labour input loss due to illness in both paid and unpaid work as well as the inclusion of presenteeism to the more traditional approach of measuring only absenteeism. Although a number of instruments have been developed to measure presenteeism, they generate widely varying estimates of productivity loss. Further investigation is required to identify which instrument provides a better estimate. Finally, we provide recommendations on measurement methods such as using subjective measures due to the unavailability of objective measures and the appropriate recall periods. We conclude by proposing a generic measure instead of a disease-specific measure and discuss important perspective related issues.
本研究旨在回顾当前的测量问题和评估方法,如“人力资本”和“摩擦成本”,以估算疾病导致的生产力损失。由于在考虑病假和工人规避风险时,或当工作类型涉及团队生产、缺乏完全替代品和/或产出的时间敏感性时,观察到的工资与边际生产力存在差异,因此生产力损失可能被低估。需要开发一个调整工资以边际生产力的乘数,以便实际使用。我们进一步考虑了在有偿和无偿工作中衡量因疾病导致的劳动力投入损失的影响,以及将出勤主义纳入更传统的仅衡量旷工的方法的影响。尽管已经开发了一些衡量出勤主义的工具,但它们产生的生产力损失估计值差异很大。需要进一步研究以确定哪种工具提供了更好的估计。最后,我们提出了一些建议,例如在没有客观测量方法和适当回忆期的情况下使用主观测量方法。最后,我们提出了一个通用的衡量方法,而不是疾病特定的衡量方法,并讨论了相关的重要观点问题。