• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

择期微创结肠切除术治疗憩室炎的短期疗效。

Short-term outcomes after elective minimally invasive colectomy for diverticulitis.

机构信息

Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2011 Mar;98(3):431-5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7345. Epub 2010 Nov 25.

DOI:10.1002/bjs.7345
PMID:21254022
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The role of minimally invasive surgery in complicated diverticulitis is still being elucidated. The aim of this study was to compare short-term outcomes in patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery for complicated or uncomplicated diverticular disease.

METHODS

All patients who had elective minimally invasive surgery for diverticulitis between 2003 and 2008 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Complicated disease was defined as diverticulitis associated with abscess, fistula, stricture or bleeding. Univariable analysis was performed to compare safety and short-term outcomes in patients with complicated and uncomplicated diverticulitis.

RESULTS

A total of 361 patients (136 with complicated and 225 with uncomplicated diverticulitis) were operated on with either a laparoscopic (36·0 per cent) or a hand-assisted laparoscopic (64·0 per cent) surgical technique. There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to age, sex, body mass index, laparoscopic approach, postoperative recovery protocol or previous open surgery. Conversion rates were similar for complicated and uncomplicated disease (14·0 versus 11·6 per cent respectively; P = 0·514). There was no difference between the groups with respect to return of bowel function (mean 3·1 versus 3·2 days respectively; P = 0·156), morbidity (27·9 versus 19·6 per cent; P = 0·070) or mean length of stay (5·4 versus 4·8 days; P = 0·186). There were no deaths within 30 days.

CONCLUSION

Elective minimally invasive colectomy is feasible for patients with uncomplicated and complicated diverticulitis, with equivalent outcomes.

摘要

背景

微创外科在复杂性憩室炎中的作用仍在阐明之中。本研究旨在比较微创治疗复杂性和非复杂性憩室疾病患者的短期疗效。

方法

从一个前瞻性维护的数据库中确定了 2003 年至 2008 年间接受微创憩室炎手术的所有患者。复杂疾病定义为与脓肿、瘘管、狭窄或出血相关的憩室炎。采用单变量分析比较复杂性和非复杂性憩室炎患者的安全性和短期疗效。

结果

共有 361 例患者(136 例复杂性憩室炎,225 例非复杂性憩室炎)接受了腹腔镜(36.0%)或手助腹腔镜(64.0%)手术治疗。两组在年龄、性别、体重指数、腹腔镜入路、术后恢复方案或既往开放性手术方面无显著差异。复杂性和非复杂性疾病的转换率相似(分别为 14.0%和 11.6%;P=0.514)。两组在肠道功能恢复方面无差异(平均 3.1 天与 3.2 天;P=0.156),发病率(分别为 27.9%和 19.6%;P=0.070)或平均住院时间(分别为 5.4 天和 4.8 天;P=0.186)也无差异。术后 30 天内无死亡。

结论

对于复杂性和非复杂性憩室炎患者,选择性微创结肠切除术是可行的,疗效相当。

相似文献

1
Short-term outcomes after elective minimally invasive colectomy for diverticulitis.择期微创结肠切除术治疗憩室炎的短期疗效。
Br J Surg. 2011 Mar;98(3):431-5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7345. Epub 2010 Nov 25.
2
Laparoscopic surgery for complicated diverticular disease: a single-centre experience.腹腔镜手术治疗复杂憩室病:单中心经验。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Oct;14(10):1248-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02924.x.
3
Laparoscopic colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis in obese and nonobese patients: a prospective comparative study.肥胖和非肥胖患者乙状结肠憩室炎的腹腔镜结肠切除术:一项前瞻性比较研究。
Surg Endosc. 2001 Dec;15(12):1427-30. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-9023-8.
4
Colovesical fistula: not a contraindication to elective laparoscopic colectomy.结肠膀胱瘘:并非择期腹腔镜结肠切除术的禁忌证。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Feb;48(2):233-6. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0849-8.
5
Laparoscopy decreases anastomotic leak rate in sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis.腹腔镜检查可降低乙状结肠切除术治疗憩室炎时的吻合口漏发生率。
Arch Surg. 2011 Feb;146(2):207-10. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.325.
6
French multicentre prospective observational study of laparoscopic versus open colectomy for sigmoid diverticular disease.关于乙状结肠憩室病的腹腔镜与开腹结肠切除术的法国多中心前瞻性观察研究。
Br J Surg. 2005 Dec;92(12):1520-5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5148.
7
The Sigma-trial protocol: a prospective double-blind multi-centre comparison of laparoscopic versus open elective sigmoid resection in patients with symptomatic diverticulitis.西格玛试验方案:有症状憩室炎患者腹腔镜与开放选择性乙状结肠切除术的前瞻性双盲多中心比较
BMC Surg. 2007 Aug 3;7:16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-7-16.
8
Persistent symptoms after elective sigmoid resection for diverticulitis.择期乙状结肠切除术治疗憩室炎后的持续症状。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Jul;51(7):1044-8. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9234-3. Epub 2008 May 1.
9
A fast-track recovery protocol improves outcomes in elective laparoscopic colectomy for diverticulitis.快速康复方案可改善择期腹腔镜结肠切除术治疗憩室炎的结局。
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Oct;211(4):485-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.05.007. Epub 2010 Aug 8.
10
The natural history diverticular disease: is there a role for elective colectomy?憩室病的自然病史:选择性结肠切除术有作用吗?
J R Coll Surg Edinb. 2002 Apr;47(2):481-2, 484.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility and safety of robotic resection of complicated diverticular disease.机器人切除复杂憩室病的可行性和安全性。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Dec;33(12):4171-4176. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06727-9. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
2
Over 1-Year Followup of Laparoscopic Treatment of Enterovesical Fistula.腹腔镜治疗小肠膀胱瘘的1年以上随访
JSLS. 2019 Jan-Mar;23(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2018.00095.
3
Elective vs. early elective surgery in diverticular disease: a retrospective study on the optimal timing of non-emergency treatment.憩室病的择期手术与早期择期手术:非急诊治疗最佳时机的回顾性研究
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 May;33(5):531-539. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3022-x. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
4
Laparoscopy for Benign Diseases of the Colon.腹腔镜治疗结肠良性疾病
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2017 Apr;30(2):91-98. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1597318.
5
Laparoscopic colectomy in obese patients: a comparison of laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic techniques.肥胖患者腹腔镜结肠切除术:腹腔镜与手助腹腔镜技术的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):3912-3921. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5422-3. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
6
Mortality and complications following surgery for diverticulitis: Systematic review and meta-analysis.憩室炎手术后的死亡率和并发症:系统评价与荟萃分析。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2016 Oct;4(5):706-713. doi: 10.1177/2050640615617357. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
7
Laparoscopic treatment of complicated colonic diverticular disease: A review.腹腔镜治疗复杂性结肠憩室病:综述
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Feb 27;8(2):134-42. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i2.134.
8
Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: Are all laparoscopic techniques created equal?腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术:所有腹腔镜技术都一样吗?
Surg Endosc. 2016 Aug;30(8):3567-72. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4654-3. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
9
Is there anything we can modify among factors associated with morbidity following elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticulitis?对于憩室炎行择期腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术后与发病相关的因素,我们有什么可以调整的吗?
Surg Endosc. 2016 Aug;30(8):3541-51. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4651-6. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
10
Role of minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of diverticular disease: an evidence-based analysis.微创手术在憩室病治疗中的作用:一项基于证据的分析。
Updates Surg. 2015 Dec;67(4):353-65. doi: 10.1007/s13304-015-0329-9. Epub 2015 Oct 8.