心理困扰、抑郁和倦怠：工作需求控制和工作需求控制支持模型的相似贡献？
Psychological distress, depression, and burnout: similar contribution of the job demand-control and job demand-control-support models?
机构信息
School of Industrial Relations, and Public Health Research Institute, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec. Canada.
出版信息
J Occup Environ Med. 2011 Feb;53(2):185-9. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e318206f0e9.
OBJECTIVE
This study examines the contribution of the Job Demand-Control (JDC) and the Job Demand-Control-Support (JDCS) models to three mental health outcomes.
METHODS
Data were collected from 410 Canadian municipal police employees. Mental health was evaluated with the General Health Questionnaire 12 items (GHQ-12), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-21) 21 items, and the Maslach Burnout Inventory 16-items general survey (MBI-16). Karasek's Job Content Questionnaire was used to measure JDC and JDCS.
RESULTS
The results revealed a differential impact of JDC and JDCS models according to the type of mental health outcome. The MBI-16 was the best-predicted outcome. Interactions at the core of the JDC and JDCS models were weakly supported.
CONCLUSIONS
The JDC and JDCS models contribute differently to workers mental health, depending on the instrument used to measure mental health. Implications for workplace health interventions are discussed.
目的
本研究考察了工作需求-控制（JDC）和工作需求-控制-支持（JDCS）模型对三种心理健康结果的贡献。
方法
数据来自 410 名加拿大市政警察员工。使用 12 项一般健康问卷（GHQ-12）、21 项贝克抑郁量表（BDI-21）和 16 项马斯拉赫职业倦怠量表一般调查（MBI-16）评估心理健康。使用卡拉克的工作内容问卷来衡量 JDC 和 JDCS。
结果
结果表明，JDC 和 JDCS 模型根据心理健康结果的类型具有不同的影响。MBI-16 是预测效果最好的。JDC 和 JDCS 模型核心的交互作用得到了微弱的支持。
结论
JDC 和 JDCS 模型对工人的心理健康有不同的贡献，这取决于用于测量心理健康的工具。讨论了对工作场所健康干预的影响。
Zotero 插件