Suppr超能文献

开放手术与腹腔镜手术治疗复发性腹股沟疝的疗效比较。

A comparison of outcomes between open and laparoscopic surgical repair of recurrent inguinal hernias.

机构信息

Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Ohio State University School of Medicine and Public Health, 548 Doan Hall, 410 West 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210-1228, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2011 Jul;25(7):2330-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1564-2. Epub 2011 Feb 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Inguinal hernia recurrence after surgical repair is a major concern. The authors report their experience with open and laparoscopic repair of recurrent inguinal hernias.

METHODS

After institutional review board approval, a retrospective review was performed with the charts of 197 patients who had undergone surgical repair of recurrent inguinal hernias from January 2000 through August 2009, and the data for 172 patients who met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. Surgical variables and clinical outcomes were compared using Student's t test, the Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square, and Fisher's exact test as appropriate.

RESULTS

The review showed that 172 patients had undergone either open mesh repair (n=61) or laparoscopic mesh repair (n=111) for recurrent inguinal hernias. Postoperative complications were experienced by 8 patients in the open group and 17 patients in laparoscopic group (p=0.70). Five patients (8.2%) in the open group and four patients (3.6%) in the laparoscopic group had re-recurrent inguinal hernias (p=0.28). Four patients in the open group (9.5%) and no patients in the laparoscopic group had recurrence during long-term follow-up evaluation (p=0.046). In the laparoscopic group, 76 patients (68.5%) underwent total extraperitoneal (TEP) repair, and 35 patients (31.5%) had transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair. Postoperative complications were experienced by 13 patients in the TEP group and 4 patients in the TAPP group (p=0.44). Two patients (2.6%) in the TEP group and two patients (5.7%) in the TAPP group had re-recurrent inguinal hernias (p=0.59).

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective review showed no statistical difference in the re-recurrence rate between the two techniques during short-term follow-up evaluation. However, the laparoscopic technique had a significantly lower re-recurrence rate than the open technique during long-term follow-up evaluation. Both procedures were comparable in terms of intra- and postoperative complications. Among laparoscopic techniques, TEP and TAPP repair are acceptable methods for the repair of recurrent inguinal hernia. A multicenter prospective randomized control trial is needed to confirm the findings of this study.

摘要

背景

腹股沟疝修补术后复发是一个主要问题。作者报告了他们使用开放和腹腔镜技术治疗复发性腹股沟疝的经验。

方法

在机构审查委员会批准后,对 2000 年 1 月至 2009 年 8 月间接受复发性腹股沟疝手术治疗的 197 例患者的病历进行了回顾性分析,对符合纳入标准的 172 例患者的数据进行了分析。使用学生 t 检验、Mann-Whitney U 检验、卡方检验和 Fisher 确切概率法对手术变量和临床结果进行了比较。

结果

研究显示,172 例患者接受了开放网片修补术(n=61)或腹腔镜网片修补术(n=111)治疗复发性腹股沟疝。开放组有 8 例(8.2%)和腹腔镜组有 17 例(17%)患者发生术后并发症(p=0.70)。开放组有 5 例(8.2%)和腹腔镜组有 4 例(3.6%)患者发生再发腹股沟疝(p=0.28)。开放组有 4 例(9.5%)和腹腔镜组无患者在长期随访评估中复发(p=0.046)。在腹腔镜组中,76 例(68.5%)患者接受了完全腹膜外(TEP)修补术,35 例(31.5%)患者接受了经腹腹膜前(TAPP)修补术。TEP 组有 13 例(13%)和 TAPP 组有 4 例(11.8%)患者发生术后并发症(p=0.44)。TEP 组有 2 例(2.6%)和 TAPP 组有 2 例(5.7%)患者发生再发腹股沟疝(p=0.59)。

结论

这项回顾性研究显示,在短期随访评估中,两种技术的再复发率没有统计学差异。然而,在长期随访评估中,腹腔镜技术的再复发率明显低于开放技术。两种手术在术中及术后并发症方面无差异。在腹腔镜技术中,TEP 和 TAPP 修补术是治疗复发性腹股沟疝的可接受方法。需要进行多中心前瞻性随机对照试验来证实本研究的结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验