Suppr超能文献

内共生体还是宿主:是谁推动了线粒体和质体的进化?

Endosymbiont or host: who drove mitochondrial and plastid evolution?

机构信息

Department of Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, and Institute of Marine and Coastal Sciences, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Foran Hall 102, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.

出版信息

Biol Direct. 2011 Feb 19;6:12. doi: 10.1186/1745-6150-6-12.

Abstract

The recognition that mitochondria and plastids are derived from alphaproteobacterial and cyanobacterial endosymbionts, respectively, was one of the greatest advances in modern evolutionary biology. Researchers have yet however to provide detailed cell biological descriptions of how these once free-living prokaryotes were transformed into intracellular organelles. A key area of study in this realm is elucidating the evolution of the molecular machines that control organelle protein topogenesis. Alcock et al. (Science 2010, 327 [5966]:649-650) suggest that evolutionary innovations that established the mitochondrial protein sorting system were driven by the alphaproteobacterial endosymbiont (an "insiders' perspective"). In contrast, here we argue that evolution of mitochondrial and plastid topogenesis may better be understood as an outcome of selective pressures acting on host cell chromosomes (the "outsiders' view").

摘要

人们认识到,线粒体和叶绿体分别来源于α-变形菌和蓝细菌的内共生体,这是现代进化生物学的重大进展之一。然而,研究人员尚未详细描述这些曾经自由生活的原核生物是如何被转化为细胞内细胞器的。在这一领域的一个重要研究领域是阐明控制细胞器蛋白质拓扑发生的分子机器的进化。Alcock 等人(Science 2010, 327 [5966]:649-650)提出,建立线粒体蛋白质分拣系统的进化创新是由α-变形菌内共生体驱动的(“内部人士的观点”)。相比之下,我们认为线粒体和叶绿体的拓扑发生进化可以更好地理解为作用于宿主细胞染色体的选择性压力的结果(“外部人士的观点”)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3a3/3050876/3a773e77ada2/1745-6150-6-12-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验