Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
ISME J. 2011 Aug;5(8):1303-13. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.11. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
To determine the reproducibility and quantitation of the amplicon sequencing-based detection approach for analyzing microbial community structure, a total of 24 microbial communities from a long-term global change experimental site were examined. Genomic DNA obtained from each community was used to amplify 16S rRNA genes with two or three barcode tags as technical replicates in the presence of a small quantity (0.1% wt/wt) of genomic DNA from Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 as the control. The technical reproducibility of the amplicon sequencing-based detection approach is quite low, with an average operational taxonomic unit (OTU) overlap of 17.2%±2.3% between two technical replicates, and 8.2%±2.3% among three technical replicates, which is most likely due to problems associated with random sampling processes. Such variations in technical replicates could have substantial effects on estimating β-diversity but less on α-diversity. A high variation was also observed in the control across different samples (for example, 66.7-fold for the forward primer), suggesting that the amplicon sequencing-based detection approach could not be quantitative. In addition, various strategies were examined to improve the comparability of amplicon sequencing data, such as increasing biological replicates, and removing singleton sequences and less-representative OTUs across biological replicates. Finally, as expected, various statistical analyses with preprocessed experimental data revealed clear differences in the composition and structure of microbial communities between warming and non-warming, or between clipping and non-clipping. Taken together, these results suggest that amplicon sequencing-based detection is useful in analyzing microbial community structure even though it is not reproducible and quantitative. However, great caution should be taken in experimental design and data interpretation when the amplicon sequencing-based detection approach is used for quantitative analysis of the β-diversity of microbial communities.
为了确定基于扩增子测序的微生物群落结构分析方法的重现性和定量能力,我们检测了来自长期全球变化实验点的 24 个微生物群落。从每个群落中提取基因组 DNA,用两种或三种条形码标签作为技术重复进行 16S rRNA 基因扩增,同时用少量(0.1%wt/wt)Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 基因组 DNA 作为对照。基于扩增子测序的检测方法的技术重现性相当低,两个技术重复之间的平均操作分类单元(OTU)重叠率为 17.2%±2.3%,三个技术重复之间的重叠率为 8.2%±2.3%,这很可能是由于随机采样过程中存在的问题。这种技术重复的差异会对估计β多样性产生重大影响,但对α多样性的影响较小。在不同样本中,对照的变化也很大(例如,正向引物的变化为 66.7 倍),这表明基于扩增子测序的检测方法不能定量。此外,还研究了各种策略来提高扩增子测序数据的可比性,例如增加生物重复,去除生物重复中 singleton 序列和代表性较低的 OTU。最后,正如预期的那样,对预处理实验数据进行了各种统计分析,结果表明在升温与非升温、修剪与非修剪之间,微生物群落的组成和结构存在明显差异。总之,这些结果表明,即使基于扩增子测序的检测方法不可重复和定量,它在分析微生物群落结构方面仍然是有用的。然而,在使用基于扩增子测序的检测方法对微生物群落的β多样性进行定量分析时,应特别注意实验设计和数据解释。