Commentary on Bryan Dowd's paper "separated at birth: statisticians, social scientists, and causality in health services research".
作者信息
O'Malley A James
机构信息
Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115-5899, USA.
出版信息
Health Serv Res. 2011 Apr;46(2):430-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01232.x. Epub 2011 Jan 28.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Commentary on Bryan Dowd's paper "separated at birth: statisticians, social scientists, and causality in health services research".对布莱恩·多德论文《出生即分离：统计学家、社会科学家与卫生服务研究中的因果关系》的评论
Health Serv Res. 2011 Apr;46(2):430-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01232.x. Epub 2011 Jan 28.
2
Statistics and causality: separated to reunite-commentary on Bryan Dowd's "separated at birth".统计学与因果关系：从分离到重聚——对布莱恩·多德《出生即分离》的评论
Health Serv Res. 2011 Apr;46(2):421-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01243.x. Epub 2011 Feb 9.
3
Separated at birth: statisticians, social scientists, and causality in health services research. 殊途同归：卫生服务研究中的统计学家、社会科学家与因果关系
Health Serv Res. 2011 Apr;46(2):397-420. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01203.x. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
4
About the role of socioeconomic position on the relation between objective health status and self-rated health: a rapid commentary on Dowd's article.
Ann Epidemiol. 2011 May;21(5):387; author reply 388-389. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.11.002.
5
On the meaning of formative measurement and how it differs from reflective measurement: comment on Howell, Breivik, and Wilcox (2007).论形成性测量的意义及其与反思性测量的差异：对豪厄尔、布雷维克和威尔科克斯（2007年）的评论
Psychol Methods. 2007 Jun;12(2):229-37; discussion 238-45. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.229.
6
Emancipation through interaction--how eugenics and statistics converged and diverged.通过互动实现解放——优生学与统计学如何趋同与分化。
J Hist Biol. 2009 Winter;42(4):649-84. doi: 10.1007/s10739-008-9167-7.
7
Bridging the gap between statistical analysis and decision making in public health research.弥合公共卫生研究中统计分析与决策之间的差距。
Stat Med. 2005 Feb 28;24(4):503-11. doi: 10.1002/sim.2031.
8
Part II: public health, social science, and the scientific method.第二部分：公共卫生、社会科学与科学方法。
Surg Neurol. 2007 Mar;67(3):318-22. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2006.11.012.
9
Use of social science data for policy analysis and policy-making.利用社会科学数据进行政策分析和决策。
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1981 Fall;59(4):596-603.
10
Two types of typicality: rethinking the role of statistical typicality in ordinary causal attributions.两种典型性：重新思考统计典型性在日常因果归因中的作用。
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2012 Dec;43(4):814-20. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2012.05.009. Epub 2012 Jun 20.
引用本文的文献
1
The role of causal inference in health services research I: tasks in health services research.因果推断在卫生服务研究中的作用I：卫生服务研究中的任务
Int J Public Health. 2020 Mar;65(2):227-230. doi: 10.1007/s00038-020-01333-2. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
本文引用的文献
1
Separated at birth: statisticians, social scientists, and causality in health services research. 殊途同归：卫生服务研究中的统计学家、社会科学家与因果关系
Health Serv Res. 2011 Apr;46(2):397-420. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01203.x. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
2
Toward Causal Inference With Interference.迈向具有干扰性的因果推断
J Am Stat Assoc. 2008 Jun;103(482):832-842. doi: 10.1198/016214508000000292.
3
Exploratory factor analyses of the CAHPS Hospital Pilot Survey responses across and within medical, surgical, and obstetric services.针对医疗、外科和产科服务领域内及之间的CAHPS医院试点调查回复进行探索性因素分析。
Health Serv Res. 2005 Dec;40(6 Pt 2):2078-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00471.x.
4
Likelihood methods for treatment noncompliance and subsequent nonresponse in randomized trials.随机试验中治疗不依从及后续无反应的似然方法。
Biometrics. 2005 Jun;61(2):325-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.040313.x.
5
Principal stratification in causal inference.因果推断中的主分层
Biometrics. 2002 Mar;58(1):21-9. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2002.00021.x.
6
G-estimation of the effect of prophylaxis therapy for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia on the survival of AIDS patients.卡氏肺孢子虫肺炎预防性治疗对艾滋病患者生存影响的G估计
Epidemiology. 1992 Jul;3(4):319-36. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199207000-00007.
Zotero 插件