Statistics and causality: separated to reunite-commentary on Bryan Dowd's "separated at birth".
作者信息
Pearl Judea
机构信息
Computer Science Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1596, USA.
出版信息
Health Serv Res. 2011 Apr;46(2):421-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01243.x. Epub 2011 Feb 9.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Statistics and causality: separated to reunite-commentary on Bryan Dowd's "separated at birth".统计学与因果关系：从分离到重聚——对布莱恩·多德《出生即分离》的评论
Health Serv Res. 2011 Apr;46(2):421-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01243.x. Epub 2011 Feb 9.
2
Commentary on Bryan Dowd's paper "separated at birth: statisticians, social scientists, and causality in health services research".对布莱恩·多德论文《出生即分离：统计学家、社会科学家与卫生服务研究中的因果关系》的评论
Health Serv Res. 2011 Apr;46(2):430-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01232.x. Epub 2011 Jan 28.
3
Separated at birth: statisticians, social scientists, and causality in health services research. 殊途同归：卫生服务研究中的统计学家、社会科学家与因果关系
Health Serv Res. 2011 Apr;46(2):397-420. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01203.x. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
4
About the role of socioeconomic position on the relation between objective health status and self-rated health: a rapid commentary on Dowd's article.
Ann Epidemiol. 2011 May;21(5):387; author reply 388-389. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.11.002.
5
On the meaning of formative measurement and how it differs from reflective measurement: comment on Howell, Breivik, and Wilcox (2007).论形成性测量的意义及其与反思性测量的差异：对豪厄尔、布雷维克和威尔科克斯（2007年）的评论
Psychol Methods. 2007 Jun;12(2):229-37; discussion 238-45. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.229.
6
Part II: public health, social science, and the scientific method.第二部分：公共卫生、社会科学与科学方法。
Surg Neurol. 2007 Mar;67(3):318-22. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2006.11.012.
7
Correlation is not causation.相关并不意味着因果关系。
Acad Med. 2008 Dec;83(12):1123; author reply 1123. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31818c749a.
8
Two types of typicality: rethinking the role of statistical typicality in ordinary causal attributions.两种典型性：重新思考统计典型性在日常因果归因中的作用。
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2012 Dec;43(4):814-20. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2012.05.009. Epub 2012 Jun 20.
9
Results from Use of Dowd'S Phosphatometer and Tonic.使用多德氏磷光计和滋补剂的结果。
Buffalo Med J. 1912 Apr;67(9):497-499.
10
Multiplicity Considerations in Clinical Trials.临床试验中的多重性考量
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 31;378(22):2115-2122. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1709701.
引用本文的文献
1
Identification of Critical States in Complex Biological Systems Using Cell-Specific Causal Network Entropy.使用细胞特异性因果网络熵识别复杂生物系统中的关键状态。
Research (Wash D C). 2025 Aug 26;8:0852. doi: 10.34133/research.0852. eCollection 2025.
2
The role of causal inference in health services research I: tasks in health services research.因果推断在卫生服务研究中的作用I：卫生服务研究中的任务
Int J Public Health. 2020 Mar;65(2):227-230. doi: 10.1007/s00038-020-01333-2. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
3
A Tutorial in Bayesian Potential Outcomes Mediation Analysis.贝叶斯潜在结果中介分析教程
Struct Equ Modeling. 2018;25(1):121-136. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2017.1342541. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
4
Different analyses estimate different parameters of the effect of erythropoietin stimulating agents on survival in end stage renal disease: a comparison of payment policy analysis, instrumental variables, and multiple imputation of potential outcomes.不同的分析方法估计促红细胞生成素刺激剂对终末期肾病患者生存的影响的不同参数：支付政策分析、工具变量和潜在结果的多重插补的比较。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;66(8 Suppl):S42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.014.
本文引用的文献
1
Building Bridges Between Structural and Program Evaluation Approaches to Evaluating Policy.搭建结构评估与项目评估方法之间的桥梁以评估政策。
J Econ Lit. 2010 Jun 1;48(2):356-398. doi: 10.1257/jel.48.2.356.
2
Separated at birth: statisticians, social scientists, and causality in health services research. 殊途同归：卫生服务研究中的统计学家、社会科学家与因果关系
Health Serv Res. 2011 Apr;46(2):397-420. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01203.x. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
3
Reflections stimulated by the comments of Shadish (2010) and West and Thoemmes (2010).受到 Shadish（2010）和 West 与 Thoemmes（2010）评论的启发而产生的思考。
Psychol Methods. 2010 Mar;15(1):38-46. doi: 10.1037/a0018537.
4
Overadjustment bias and unnecessary adjustment in epidemiologic studies.流行病学研究中的过度调整偏倚与不必要的调整
Epidemiology. 2009 Jul;20(4):488-95. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181a819a1.
5
Opening the Black Box: a motivation for the assessment of mediation.打开黑匣子：评估中介作用的一个动机。
Int J Epidemiol. 2009 Jun;38(3):838-45. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyn372. Epub 2009 Mar 4.
6
Marginal structural models for the estimation of direct and indirect effects.用于估计直接效应和间接效应的边际结构模型。
Epidemiology. 2009 Jan;20(1):18-26. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31818f69ce.
7
Reducing bias through directed acyclic graphs.通过有向无环图减少偏差。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Oct 30;8:70. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-70.
8
Four types of effect modification: a classification based on directed acyclic graphs.四种效应修正类型：基于有向无环图的分类
Epidemiology. 2007 Sep;18(5):561-8. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318127181b.
9
Estimation of direct causal effects.直接因果效应的估计
Epidemiology. 2006 May;17(3):276-84. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000208475.99429.2d.
10
Data, design, and background knowledge in etiologic inference.病因推断中的数据、设计与背景知识。
Epidemiology. 2001 May;12(3):313-20. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200105000-00011.
Zotero 插件