Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ophthalmology. 2011 Jul;118(7):1310-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.12.018. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
To assess the impact of change in visual field (VF) on change in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at the population level.
Prospective cohort study.
Three thousand one hundred seventy-five Los Angles Latino Eye Study participants.
Objective measures of VF and visual acuity and self-reported HRQoL were collected at baseline and at the 4-year follow-up. Analysis of covariance was used to evaluate mean differences in change of HRQoL across severity levels of change in VF and to test for effect modification by covariates.
General and vision-specific HRQoL.
Of 3175 participants, 1430 (45%) showed a change in VF (≥1 decibel [dB]) and 1715 (54%) reported a clinically important change (≥5 points) in vision-specific HRQoL. Progressive worsening and improvement in the VF were associated with increasing losses and gains in vision-specific HRQoL for the composite score and 10 of its 11 subscales (all P(trend)<0.05). Losses in VF of more than 5 dB and gains of more than 3 dB were associated with clinically meaningful losses and gains in vision-specific HRQoL, respectively. Areas of vision-specific HRQoL most affected by greater losses in VF were driving, dependency, role-functioning, and mental health. The effect of change in VF (loss or gain) on mean change in vision-specific HRQoL varied by level of baseline vision loss (in VF, visual acuity, or both) and by change in visual acuity (all P(interaction)<0.05). Those with moderate or severe VF loss at baseline and with a more than 5 dB loss in VF during the study period had a mean loss of vision-specific HRQoL of 11.3 points, whereas those with no VF loss at baseline had a mean loss of 0.97 points. Similarly, with a more than 5 dB loss in VF and baseline visual acuity impairment (mild or severe), there was a loss in vision-specific HRQoL of 10.5 points, whereas with no visual acuity impairment at baseline, there was a loss of vision-specific HRQoL of 3.7 points.
Both losses and gains in VF produce clinically meaningful changes in vision-specific HRQoL. In the presence of pre-existing vision loss (VF and visual acuity), similar levels of VF change produce greater losses in QOL.
在人群水平上评估视野(VF)变化对健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)变化的影响。
前瞻性队列研究。
3175 名洛杉矶拉丁裔眼病研究参与者。
在基线和 4 年随访时收集客观的 VF 和视力测量以及自我报告的 HRQoL。采用协方差分析评估 HRQoL 变化的均值差异,跨越 VF 变化的严重程度,并检验协变量的效应修饰。
一般和视觉特异性 HRQoL。
在 3175 名参与者中,1430 名(45%)出现 VF 变化(≥1 分贝[dB]),1715 名(54%)报告视觉特异性 HRQoL 有临床意义的变化(≥5 分)。VF 的逐渐恶化和改善与复合评分及其 11 个子量表中的 10 个(所有 P(trend)<0.05)的视力特异性 HRQoL 的逐渐增加和减少相关。VF 损失超过 5 dB 和增益超过 3 dB 分别与视力特异性 HRQoL 的临床显著损失和增益相关。受 VF 更大损失影响最大的视觉特异性 HRQoL 领域是驾驶、依赖、角色功能和心理健康。VF 变化(损失或增益)对视觉特异性 HRQoL 平均变化的影响因基线 VF、视力或两者的损失程度以及视力变化程度而异(所有 P(交互)<0.05)。那些在基线时 VF 损失中度或重度且在研究期间 VF 损失超过 5 dB 的人,视力特异性 HRQoL 的平均损失为 11.3 分,而那些在基线时没有 VF 损失的人,平均损失为 0.97 分。同样,VF 损失超过 5 dB 且基线视力障碍(轻度或重度)时,视力特异性 HRQoL 损失为 10.5 分,而基线时无视力障碍时,视力特异性 HRQoL 损失为 3.7 分。
VF 的损失和增益都会导致视觉特异性 HRQoL 的临床显著变化。在存在预先存在的视力损失(VF 和视力)的情况下,VF 变化的相同水平会导致更大的生活质量损失。