İlkevin Special Education and Rehabilitation Centre, Istanbul, Turkey.
Rheumatol Int. 2012 Jul;32(7):1949-54. doi: 10.1007/s00296-011-1888-9. Epub 2011 Apr 2.
We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of balneotherapy in fibromyalgia management. Fifty women with fibromyalgia under pharmacological treatment were randomly assigned to either the balneotherapy (25) or the control (25) group. Four patients from the balneotherapy group and one patient from the control group left the study after randomization. The patients in the balneotherapy group (21) had 2 thermomineral water baths daily for 2 weeks in Tuzla Spa Center. The patients in the control group (24) continued to have their medical treatment and routine daily life. An investigator who was blinded to the study arms assessed the patients. All patients were assessed four times; at the beginning of the study, at the end of the 2nd week, the 1st month, and the 3rd month after balneotherapy. Outcome measures of the study were pain intensity, Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), patient's global assessment, investigator's global assessment, SF-36 scores, and tender point count. Balneotherapy was found to be superior at the end of the cure period in terms of pain intensity, FIQ, Beck Depression Inventory, patient's global assessment, investigator's global assessment scores, and tender point count as compared to the control group. The superiority of balneotherapy lasted up to the end of the 3rd month, except for the Beck Depression Inventory score and the investigator's global assessment score. Significant improvements were observed in PF, GH, and MH subscales of SF-36 during the study period in the balneotherapy group; however, no such improvement was observed in the control group. Balneotherapy was superior only in VT subscale at the end of therapy and at the end of the third month after the therapy as compared to the controls. It was concluded that balneotherapy provides beneficial effects in patients with fibromyalgia.
我们旨在评估水疗在纤维肌痛管理中的有效性。五十名接受药物治疗的纤维肌痛女性患者被随机分为水疗组(25 名)或对照组(25 名)。水疗组的 4 名患者和对照组的 1 名患者在随机分组后退出了研究。水疗组的 21 名患者在图兹拉温泉中心每天接受 2 次热矿水浴,为期 2 周。对照组的 24 名患者继续接受他们的药物治疗和日常生活。一位对研究分组不知情的研究者评估了患者。所有患者均在研究开始时、第 2 周结束时、第 1 个月和第 3 个月进行了 4 次评估。研究的结局指标包括疼痛强度、纤维肌痛影响问卷(FIQ)、贝克抑郁量表(BDI)、患者总体评估、研究者总体评估、SF-36 评分和压痛计数。与对照组相比,水疗在治疗结束时在疼痛强度、FIQ、贝克抑郁量表、患者总体评估、研究者总体评估评分和压痛计数方面表现出优越性。水疗的优越性持续到第 3 个月结束,除了贝克抑郁量表评分和研究者总体评估评分。在水疗组中,SF-36 的 PF、GH 和 MH 子量表在研究期间观察到显著改善;然而,对照组则没有。与对照组相比,水疗仅在治疗结束时和治疗结束后第 3 个月时在 VT 子量表上具有优越性。总之,水疗对纤维肌痛患者有有益的影响。