Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204-5022, USA.
Behav Ther. 2011 Jun;42(2):336-47. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.010. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
This study tests the immediate impact of two interventions for intimate partner violent (IPV) men in affecting behavioral and emotional change during arguments with their partners. Couples with an abusive male partner (N=100) discussed an area of conflict twice, interrupted by a brief intervention. Men were randomly assigned to receive (a) an editing-out-the-negative skills training, (b) an accepting influence skills training, or (c) a time-out. IPV men in both skills-training conditions showed greater decreases in aggressive feelings than IPV men in the time-out condition based on their self-report and observed affective behavior. Women also reported feeling less aggressive when their husbands were assigned to one of the skills-training conditions as compared to the control (time-out) condition. Results suggest that IPV men can learn to adopt new communication skills and that they do appear to have a positive impact on the emotional tone of their arguments. Clinically, communication skills training may be a useful addition to battering intervention programs, although these skills may need to be taught to both men and women involved in violent relationships.
这项研究测试了两种干预措施对亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)男性的即时影响,以影响他们与伴侣争吵时的行为和情绪变化。有虐待男性伴侣的夫妇(N=100)两次讨论了一个冲突领域,中间插入了一个简短的干预。男性被随机分配接受(a)消除消极技能培训,(b)接受影响技能培训,或(c)暂停。根据自我报告和观察到的情感行为,接受技能培训的 IPV 男性比暂停组的 IPV 男性表现出更强烈的攻击性情绪下降。与对照组(暂停)相比,当丈夫被分配到技能培训组之一时,女性也报告说感觉不那么有攻击性。研究结果表明,IPV 男性可以学会采用新的沟通技巧,而且他们似乎确实对争吵的情绪基调产生了积极影响。临床上,沟通技巧培训可能是对虐待干预项目的有益补充,尽管这些技能可能需要教授给参与暴力关系的男女双方。