• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分享道德价值观:预期的内群体尊重是遵守基于道德(而不是基于能力)的群体规范的决定因素。

Sharing moral values: anticipated ingroup respect as a determinant of adherence to morality-based (but not competence-based) group norms.

机构信息

Second University of Naples, 81100-Caserta, Italy.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011 Aug;37(8):1117-29. doi: 10.1177/0146167211406906. Epub 2011 May 3.

DOI:10.1177/0146167211406906
PMID:21540366
Abstract

This research examines how moral values regulate the behavior of individual group members. It argues that group members behave in line with moral group norms because they anticipate receiving ingroup respect when enacting moral values that are shared by ingroup members. Data from two experimental studies offer evidence in support. In Study 1 (N = 82), morality-based (but not competence-based) ingroup norms determined whether members of a low-status group opted for individual versus collective strategies for status improvement. This effect was mediated by anticipated ingroup respect and emerged regardless of whether group norms prescribed collectivistic or individualistic behavior. These effects were replicated in Study 2 (N = 69), where no comparable effect was found as a result of moral norms communicated by a higher status outgroup. This indicates that social identity implications rather than interdependence or more generic concerns about social approval or importance of cooperation drive these effects.

摘要

这项研究考察了道德价值观如何规范个体群体成员的行为。它认为,群体成员之所以会按照道德群体规范行事,是因为他们预计在践行与群体成员共同持有的道德价值观时会得到群体内的尊重。来自两项实验研究的数据提供了支持证据。在研究 1(N=82)中,基于道德的(而非基于能力的)群体规范决定了低地位群体的成员是否会选择个人还是集体策略来提高地位。这种影响是由预期的群体内尊重介导的,无论群体规范规定的是集体主义还是个人主义行为,这种影响都存在。这些影响在研究 2(N=69)中得到了复制,由于来自高地位的外群体传达的道德规范,没有发现类似的影响。这表明,是社会认同的影响而不是相互依存或更普遍地关注社会认可或合作的重要性推动了这些影响。

相似文献

1
Sharing moral values: anticipated ingroup respect as a determinant of adherence to morality-based (but not competence-based) group norms.分享道德价值观:预期的内群体尊重是遵守基于道德(而不是基于能力)的群体规范的决定因素。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011 Aug;37(8):1117-29. doi: 10.1177/0146167211406906. Epub 2011 May 3.
2
Is it better to be moral than smart? The effects of morality and competence norms on the decision to work at group status improvement.讲道德比聪明更好吗?道德规范和能力规范对致力于提升群体地位的决策的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Dec;95(6):1397-410. doi: 10.1037/a0012628.
3
Group morality and intergroup relations: cross-cultural and experimental evidence.群体道德与群体间关系:跨文化及实验证据
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 Nov;32(11):1559-72. doi: 10.1177/0146167206291673.
4
Young children enforce social norms selectively depending on the violator's group affiliation.年幼的儿童会根据违规者的群体归属有选择性地执行社会规范。
Cognition. 2012 Sep;124(3):325-33. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Jul 4.
5
Group norms, intergroup resource allocation, and social reasoning among children and adolescents.儿童和青少年的群体规范、群体间资源分配和社会推理。
Dev Psychol. 2017 Dec;53(12):2333-2339. doi: 10.1037/dev0000392. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
6
Competitive victimhood as a response to accusations of ingroup harm doing.竞争受害者身份认同作为对群体内伤害行为指控的回应。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Apr;102(4):778-95. doi: 10.1037/a0026573. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
7
Striving for success in outgroup settings: effects of contextually emphasizing ingroup dimensions on stigmatized group members' social identity and performance styles.在外群体环境中追求成功:情境性强调内群体维度对受污名化群体成员社会认同和表现风格的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 May;32(5):576-88. doi: 10.1177/0146167205283336.
8
Different effects of religion and God on prosociality with the ingroup and outgroup.宗教和上帝对同群体和外群体亲社会行为的不同影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Nov;39(11):1471-83. doi: 10.1177/0146167213499937. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
9
Increased Moral Sensitivity for Outgroup Perpetrators Harming Ingroup Members.对伤害内群体成员的外群体作恶者道德敏感度的提高。
Cereb Cortex. 2016 Jan;26(1):225-33. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu195. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
10
When I's meet: sharing subjective experience with someone from the outgroup.当我与他人相遇时:与外群体的人分享主观体验。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 Mar;38(3):296-307. doi: 10.1177/0146167211433878.

引用本文的文献

1
Belonging through values: ethical leadership, creativity, and psychological safety with ethical climate as a moderator.通过价值观实现归属感:以道德氛围为调节变量的道德领导力、创造力和心理安全感。
Front Psychol. 2025 May 2;16:1559427. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1559427. eCollection 2025.
2
Do Binding Moral Foundations Predict a Hypothetical Moral Behavior? The Moderating Role of the Perception of the In-Group Moral Standards.具有约束力的道德基础能预测假设的道德行为吗?群体道德标准认知的调节作用。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Feb 24;15(3):265. doi: 10.3390/bs15030265.
3
The emergence of moral alignment within human groups is facilitated by interbrain synchrony.
人际大脑同步促进了人类群体中道德一致性的出现。
Commun Biol. 2025 Mar 20;8(1):464. doi: 10.1038/s42003-025-07831-4.
4
Binding moral values gain importance in the presence of close others.在亲近的人面前,绑定道德价值观变得更加重要。
Nat Commun. 2021 May 11;12(1):2718. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22566-6.
5
I cannot live without air conditioning! The role of identity, values and situational factors on cooling consumption patterns in India.
Energy Res Soc Sci. 2020 Nov;69:101634. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101634. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
6
Ethical Climate(s), Organizational Identification, and Employees' Behavior.道德氛围、组织认同与员工行为
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 19;10:1356. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01356. eCollection 2019.
7
The Psychology of Morality: A Review and Analysis of Empirical Studies Published From 1940 Through 2017.《道德心理学:对 1940 年至 2017 年发表的实证研究的综述与分析》。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2019 Sep/Oct;23(4):332-366. doi: 10.1177/1088868318811759. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
8
Seeing beyond political affiliations: The mediating role of perceived moral foundations on the partisan similarity-liking effect.超越政治党派偏见:感知道德基础在党派相似性偏好效应中的中介作用。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 29;13(8):e0202101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202101. eCollection 2018.
9
On the Effects of Ethical Climate(s) on Employees' Behavior: A Social Identity Approach.论道德氛围对员工行为的影响:一种社会认同视角
Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 12;9:960. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00960. eCollection 2018.
10
Once Dishonest, Always Dishonest? The Impact of Perceived Pervasiveness of Moral Evaluations of the Self on Motivation to Restore a Moral Reputation.一骗永骗?对自我道德评价普遍性的认知对恢复道德声誉动机的影响。
Front Psychol. 2016 Apr 26;7:586. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00586. eCollection 2016.