• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卒中幸存者的照顾者关系和生活质量:一项横断面研究。

The caregiving relationship and quality of life among partners of stroke survivors: a cross-sectional study.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, 451, Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H8M5, Canada.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011 May 9;9:29. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-29.

DOI:10.1186/1477-7525-9-29
PMID:21554723
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3111340/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since the majority of stroke survivors return home following their stroke, families play a pivotal role in their care. Few studies have addressed both positive and negative aspects of this role or the broader construct of health-related quality of life (HRQL). Furthermore, little consideration has been given to the context of care in terms of relationship quality, and reciprocity. The present study examined the relationships between caregiver quality of life (HRQL), caregiver role, relationship satisfaction, balance and reciprocity in caregivers of partners who had experienced a stroke. Specific hypotheses were made based on equity theory in social relations.

METHODS

Fifty-six partner caregivers completed a postal survey that included measures of HRQL (SF-36), caregiver role (negative and positive aspects), relationship satisfaction, reciprocity and balance. Data were also collected on the care recipients' quality of life (Stroke Specific Quality of Life scale).

RESULTS

Compared to a normative sample, caregivers' HRQL was lower for all SF-36 domains. Care recipient and caregiver age, care recipient quality of life and caregiver role (negative) significantly predicted physical component summary scores on the SF-36, while care recipient quality of life and caregiver role (negative) significantly correlated with mental component summary scores. Relationship satisfaction and intrinsic rewards of caregiving were found to be important predictors of positive aspects of the caregiver role. Caregivers who viewed their relationship as less balanced in terms of give and take had significantly greater caregiver burden than those who viewed their relationship as more equitable.

CONCLUSIONS

The study highlights the importance of taking a broader approach to examining partner caregiving in the context of stroke, in terms of the caregiving relationship and their influence on the health and well-being of caregivers.

摘要

背景

由于大多数中风幸存者在中风后会返回家中,因此家庭在他们的护理中起着关键作用。很少有研究涉及到这个角色的积极和消极方面,也很少有研究涉及到更广泛的健康相关生活质量(HRQL)概念。此外,很少有人考虑到关系质量和互惠在护理方面的背景。本研究考察了经历过中风的伴侣照顾者的照顾者生活质量(HRQL)、照顾者角色、关系满意度、平衡和互惠之间的关系。根据社会关系中的公平理论提出了具体的假设。

方法

56 名伴侣照顾者完成了一项邮寄调查,其中包括 HRQL(SF-36)、照顾者角色(积极和消极方面)、关系满意度、互惠和平衡的衡量标准。还收集了照顾者的生活质量(中风特定生活质量量表)的数据。

结果

与常模样本相比,所有 SF-36 领域的照顾者 HRQL 都较低。照顾者和被照顾者的年龄、被照顾者的生活质量和照顾者的角色(负面)显著预测了 SF-36 的生理成分综合评分,而被照顾者的生活质量和照顾者的角色(负面)与心理成分综合评分显著相关。关系满意度和护理的内在回报被认为是照顾者角色积极方面的重要预测因素。那些认为自己的关系在给予和索取方面不平衡的照顾者,其照顾者负担比那些认为自己的关系更公平的照顾者负担要大得多。

结论

本研究强调了在中风背景下,从照顾关系及其对照顾者健康和幸福的影响的更广泛角度来考察伴侣照顾的重要性。

相似文献

1
The caregiving relationship and quality of life among partners of stroke survivors: a cross-sectional study.卒中幸存者的照顾者关系和生活质量:一项横断面研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011 May 9;9:29. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-29.
2
Positive caregiving experiences are associated with life satisfaction in spouses of stroke survivors.积极的护理体验与中风幸存者配偶的生活满意度相关。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012 Nov;21(8):801-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.04.011. Epub 2011 Jun 2.
3
The longitudinal and dyadic effects of mutuality on perceived stress for stroke survivors and their spousal caregivers.相互性对脑卒中幸存者及其配偶照顾者感知压力的纵向和对偶影响。
Aging Ment Health. 2013;17(4):423-31. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2012.756457. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
4
Informal caregivers' well-being and care recipients' quality of life and community reintegration - findings from a stroke survivor sample.非正式照料者的福祉、照料对象的生活质量与社区重新融入——来自中风幸存者样本的研究结果
Scand J Caring Sci. 2019 Sep;33(3):641-650. doi: 10.1111/scs.12657. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
5
Spousal caregiving for stroke survivors.中风幸存者的配偶照料
J Neurosci Nurs. 2007 Apr;39(2):112-9. doi: 10.1097/01376517-200704000-00008.
6
The balance of give and take in caregiver-partner relationships: An examination of self-perceived burden, relationship equity, and quality of life from the perspective of care recipients following stroke.照顾者-伴侣关系中的得失平衡:从脑卒中后照顾者的角度出发,考察自我感知负担、关系公平性和生活质量。
Rehabil Psychol. 2010 May;55(2):194-203. doi: 10.1037/a0019359.
7
The Relationship Between Mutuality and Health-Related Quality of Life in Adult Child Caregivers in China.中国成年子女照顾者的相互关系与健康相关生活质量的关系。
J Fam Nurs. 2017 Aug;23(3):366-391. doi: 10.1177/1074840717718540. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
8
The effect of cognitive appraisal in middle-aged women stroke survivors and the psychological health of their caregivers: a follow-up study.认知评估对中年女性中风幸存者及其照顾者心理健康的影响:一项随访研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2015 Nov;24(21-22):3155-64. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12926. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
9
Hope, health work and quality of life in families of stroke survivors.中风幸存者家庭中的希望、健康工作与生活质量。
J Adv Nurs. 2004 Nov;48(4):322-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03004.x.
10
Social inequalities in the burden of care: a dyadic analysis in the caregiving partners of persons with a physical disability.社会不平等在照顾负担中的体现:对有身体残疾人士的照顾者的对偶分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Dec 31;19(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1112-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Determining the Burden of a Caregiver Providing Care to a Post-Stroke Patient.决定中风后患者护理者负担的因素。
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 26;14(9):3008. doi: 10.3390/jcm14093008.
2
Understanding the impact of dementia on spousal relationships: A qualitative study with female spousal carers of people living with dementia.了解痴呆症对配偶关系的影响:一项对痴呆症患者女性配偶照顾者的定性研究。
Dementia (London). 2025 Jan;24(1):23-39. doi: 10.1177/14713012241286559. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
3
Functional Transitions Among Older Adults in Rural China: Examining the Differential Roles of Care From Daughters' and Sons' Families.中国农村老年人的功能转变:考察女儿和儿子家庭的照料的差异作用。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2024 Oct 1;79(10). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbae133.
4
Informal Family Care Partner Well-Being Is Diminished in End-Stage Liver Disease.终末期肝病患者的非正式家庭护理伙伴的幸福感降低。
Nurs Res. 2024;73(4):E202-E211. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000740. Epub 2024 Mar 23.
5
Longing for normalcy in couple relationships: How chronic illness and care dependency change the relationship of long-married couples.对夫妻关系正常化的渴望:慢性病和依赖护理如何改变长期已婚夫妇的关系。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 17;11:1117786. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1117786. eCollection 2023.
6
A Socially Assistive Robot for Stroke Patients: Acceptance, Needs, and Concerns of Patients and Informal Caregivers.一款用于中风患者的社交辅助机器人:患者及非正式护理人员的接受度、需求与担忧
Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Jan 25;2:793233. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2021.793233. eCollection 2021.
7
How does long-term care impact the psychological wellbeing of older adults in different care policy contexts in the Netherlands?: A comparison of 1998, 2008 and 2018: A comparison of 1998, 2008 and 2018.长期护理如何影响不同护理政策环境下荷兰老年人的心理健康?:1998 年、2008 年和 2018 年的比较
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Sep;30(5):e2750-e2760. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13719. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
8
Examining the Influence of Social Interactions and Community Resources on Caregivers' Burden in Stroke Settings: A Prospective Cohort Study.探讨社会互动和社区资源对脑卒中环境下照顾者负担的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 23;18(23):12310. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312310.
9
Active With Whom? Examining the Social Context of Physical Activity in Individuals After Stroke and Their Partners.与谁一起活动?考察中风后个体及其伴侣的身体活动的社会环境。
Front Public Health. 2021 Sep 29;9:754046. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.754046. eCollection 2021.
10
The challenges and experiences of stroke patients and their spouses in Blantyre, Malawi.马拉维布兰太尔中风患者及其配偶面临的挑战与经历。
Malawi Med J. 2019 Jun;31(2):112-117. doi: 10.4314/mmj.v31i2.2.

本文引用的文献

1
How Many Subjects Does It Take To Do A Regression Analysis.进行回归分析需要多少受试者?
Multivariate Behav Res. 1991 Jul 1;26(3):499-510. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2603_7.
2
The balance of give and take in caregiver-partner relationships: An examination of self-perceived burden, relationship equity, and quality of life from the perspective of care recipients following stroke.照顾者-伴侣关系中的得失平衡:从脑卒中后照顾者的角度出发,考察自我感知负担、关系公平性和生活质量。
Rehabil Psychol. 2010 May;55(2):194-203. doi: 10.1037/a0019359.
3
Does a helping hand mean a heavy heart? Helping behavior and well-being among spouse caregivers.援手是否意味着沉重的心情?配偶照顾者中的帮助行为和幸福感。
Psychol Aging. 2010 Mar;25(1):108-17. doi: 10.1037/a0018064.
4
Caregiving experiences after stroke.中风后的护理经历。
Nurs Res. 2001 Jan-Feb;50(1):53-60. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200101000-00008.
5
Family functioning is associated with depressive symptoms in caregivers of acute stroke survivors.家庭功能与急性中风幸存者照料者的抑郁症状相关。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Jun;90(6):947-55. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.12.014.
6
Informal carers of stroke survivors--factors influencing carers: a systematic review of quantitative studies.中风幸存者的非正式照料者——影响照料者的因素:定量研究的系统综述
Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(18):1329-49. doi: 10.1080/09638280701602178.
7
Informal primary carers of stroke survivors living at home-challenges, satisfactions and coping: a systematic review of qualitative studies.居家中风幸存者的非正式主要照料者——挑战、满意度与应对策略:定性研究的系统综述
Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(5):337-51. doi: 10.1080/09638280802051721.
8
Patient suffering and caregiver compassion: new opportunities for research, practice, and policy.患者的痛苦与照护者的同情:研究、实践与政策的新机遇。
Gerontologist. 2007 Feb;47(1):4-13. doi: 10.1093/geront/47.1.4.
9
Determinants of caregiving burden and quality of life in caregivers of stroke patients.中风患者照料者的照料负担及生活质量的决定因素
Stroke. 2005 Oct;36(10):2181-6. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000181755.23914.53. Epub 2005 Sep 8.
10
Determinants of quality of life in stroke survivors and their informal caregivers.中风幸存者及其非正式照料者生活质量的决定因素。
Stroke. 2005 Apr;36(4):803-8. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000160873.32791.20. Epub 2005 Mar 10.