• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

住院时间延迟会增加成年人阑尾炎穿孔的风险。

In-hospital delay increases the risk of perforation in adults with appendicitis.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Triemli Hospital Zurich, Birmensdorferstrasse, 8063, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2011 Jul;35(7):1626-33. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1101-z.

DOI:10.1007/s00268-011-1101-z
PMID:21562871
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The influence of in-hospital delay (time between admission and operation) on outcome after appendectomy is controversial.

METHODS

A total of 1,827 adult patients underwent open or laparoscopic appendectomy for suspected appendicitis in eleven Swiss hospitals between 2003 and 2006. Of these, 1,675 patients with confirmed appendicitis were included in the study. Groups were defined according in-hospital delay (≤12 vs. >12 h).

RESULTS

Delay>12 h was associated with a significantly higher frequency of perforated appendicitis (29.7 vs. 22.7%; P=0.010) whereas a delay of 6 or 9 h was not. Size of institution, time of admission, and surgical technique (laparoscopic vs. open) were independent factors influencing in-hospital delay. Admission during regular hours was associated with higher age, higher frequency of co-morbidity, and higher perforation rate compared to admission after hours. The logistic regression identified four independent factors associated with an increased perforation rate: age (≤65 years vs. >65 years, odds ratio (OR) 4.5, P<0.001); co-morbidity (Charlson index>0 vs. Charlson index=0, OR 2.3, P<0.001); time of admission (after hours vs. regular hours, OR 0.8, P=0.040), in-hospital delay (>12 vs. ≤12 h, OR 1.5, P=0.005). Perforation was associated with an increased reintervention rate (13.4 vs. 1.6%; P<0.001) and longer length of hospital stay (9.5 vs. 4.4 days; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In-hospital delay negatively influences outcome after appendectomy. In-hospital delay of more than 12 h, age over 65 years, time of admission during regular hours, and the presence of co-morbidity are all independent risk factors for perforation. Perforation was associated with a higher reintervention rate and increased length of hospital stay.

摘要

背景

住院时间(入院至手术的时间)对阑尾切除术的结果有影响,但其影响一直存在争议。

方法

2003 年至 2006 年间,瑞士 11 家医院对 1827 例疑似阑尾炎的成年患者进行了开放或腹腔镜阑尾切除术。其中,1675 例确诊为阑尾炎的患者被纳入研究。根据住院时间(≤12 小时与>12 小时)分为两组。

结果

与住院时间≤12 小时相比,住院时间>12 小时与更高的穿孔性阑尾炎发生率(29.7%比 22.7%;P=0.010)显著相关,而 6 小时或 9 小时的住院时间并无差异。医院规模、入院时间和手术技术(腹腔镜与开放)是影响住院时间的独立因素。正常工作时间入院的患者年龄较大、合并症较多、穿孔率较高。与非正常工作时间入院相比,正常工作时间入院的患者年龄较大、合并症较多、穿孔率较高。逻辑回归分析确定了与穿孔率增加相关的四个独立因素:年龄(≤65 岁与>65 岁,比值比(OR)4.5,P<0.001);合并症(Charlson 指数>0 与 Charlson 指数=0,OR 2.3,P<0.001);入院时间(非正常工作时间与正常工作时间,OR 0.8,P=0.040);住院时间(>12 小时与≤12 小时,OR 1.5,P=0.005)。穿孔与再次干预率(13.4%比 1.6%;P<0.001)和住院时间延长(9.5 天比 4.4 天;P<0.001)有关。

结论

住院时间延迟对阑尾切除术的结果有负面影响。超过 12 小时的住院时间延迟、年龄大于 65 岁、正常工作时间入院以及合并症的存在是穿孔的独立危险因素。穿孔与更高的再次干预率和更长的住院时间有关。

相似文献

1
In-hospital delay increases the risk of perforation in adults with appendicitis.住院时间延迟会增加成年人阑尾炎穿孔的风险。
World J Surg. 2011 Jul;35(7):1626-33. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1101-z.
2
Risk of perforation increases with delay in recognition and surgery for acute appendicitis.急性阑尾炎的穿孔风险随着对其认识和手术的延误而增加。
J Surg Res. 2013 Oct;184(2):723-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.12.008. Epub 2012 Dec 27.
3
Appendectomy timing: waiting until the next morning increases the risk of surgical site infections.阑尾切除术时机:等到第二天早上会增加手术部位感染的风险。
Ann Surg. 2012 Sep;256(3):538-43. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318265ea13.
4
Impact of In-Hospital Timing to Appendectomy on Perforation Rates in Children with Appendicitis.住院期间行阑尾切除术的时机对阑尾炎患儿穿孔率的影响。
J Emerg Med. 2015 Nov;49(5):597-604. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.04.009. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
5
Association of Delay in Appendectomy With Perforation in Children With Appendicitis.阑尾炎患儿阑尾切除术延迟与穿孔的关联
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2019 Jan;35(1):45-49. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000850.
6
Delay to appendicectomy and associated morbidity: a retrospective review.阑尾切除术延迟及其相关并发症:一项回顾性研究。
ANZ J Surg. 2006 Mar;76(3):153-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03673.x.
7
Factors affecting the length of hospital stay after laparoscopic appendectomy: A single center study.腹腔镜阑尾切除术住院时间的影响因素:单中心研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 9;15(12):e0243575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243575. eCollection 2020.
8
Multicenter Study of the Treatment of Appendicitis in America: Acute, Perforated, and Gangrenous (MUSTANG), an EAST Multicenter Study.美国急性、穿孔和坏疽性阑尾炎治疗的多中心研究:EAST 多中心研究(MUSTANG)。
Ann Surg. 2021 Mar 1;273(3):548-556. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003661.
9
Short-term outcome after appendectomy is related to preoperative delay but not to the time of day of the procedure: A nationwide retrospective cohort study of 9224 patients.阑尾切除术的短期预后与术前延误有关,但与手术时间无关:一项全国性回顾性队列研究,共纳入 9224 例患者。
Int J Surg. 2020 Apr;76:16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.02.001. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
10
Effect of delay in presentation on rate of perforation in children with appendicitis.阑尾炎患儿就诊时间延迟对穿孔率的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Oct;29(8):890-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.04.005. Epub 2010 Jul 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopic appendectomy as the gold standard: What role remains for open surgery, conversion, and disease severity? : An analysis of 32,000 cases with appendicitis in Germany.腹腔镜阑尾切除术作为金标准:开放手术、中转手术及疾病严重程度还发挥着什么作用?:对德国32000例阑尾炎病例的分析
World J Emerg Surg. 2025 Jun 18;20(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13017-025-00626-2.
2
Development and validation of automated three-dimensional convolutional neural network model for acute appendicitis diagnosis.用于急性阑尾炎诊断的自动化三维卷积神经网络模型的开发与验证
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 5;15(1):7711. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84348-6.
3
Daytime versus nighttime appendectomy in term of complications and clinical outcomes: a meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
A meta-analysis comparing conservative treatment versus acute appendectomy for complicated appendicitis (abscess or phlegmon).一项比较保守治疗与急性阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎(脓肿或蜂窝织炎)的荟萃分析。
Surgery. 2010 Jun;147(6):818-29. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.11.013. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
2
Perforated appendicitis: is early laparoscopic appendectomy appropriate?穿孔性阑尾炎:早期腹腔镜阑尾切除术是否合适?
Surgery. 2009 Oct;146(4):731-7; discussion 737-8. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.06.053.
3
Effect of time on risk of perforation in acute appendicitis.
日间与夜间行阑尾切除术治疗的并发症和临床结局比较:一项荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Aug 14;39(1):131. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04705-9.
4
Preoperative in-hospital delay increases postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients with acute appendicitis: a meta-analysis.术前住院延迟增加急性阑尾炎患者术后发病率和死亡率:一项荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2025 Jan 1;111(1):1275-1284. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001938.
5
Emphasizing the Clinical Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis Amidst Technological Advancements.在技术进步的背景下强调急性阑尾炎的临床诊断
Cureus. 2024 May 18;16(5):e60555. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60555. eCollection 2024 May.
6
Predicting severity of acute appendicitis with machine learning methods: a simple and promising approach for clinicians.运用机器学习方法预测急性阑尾炎的严重程度:一种简单而有前途的临床方法。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Jun 18;24(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01023-9.
7
The impact of timing on outcomes in appendicectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.手术时机对阑尾切除术结局的影响:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
World J Emerg Surg. 2024 Jun 14;19(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13017-024-00549-4.
8
Effect of in-hospital delay on acute appendicitis severity: does time really matter?院内延迟对急性阑尾炎严重程度的影响:时间真的重要吗?
Updates Surg. 2024 Sep;76(5):1775-1781. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01823-5. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
9
Is the performance of acute appendectomy at different times of day equal, in terms of postoperative complications, readmission, death, and length of hospital stay? A Swedish retrospective cohort study of 4950 patients.在术后并发症、再入院、死亡和住院时间方面,一天中不同时间进行的急性阑尾炎手术的效果是否相等?一项瑞典回顾性队列研究纳入了 4950 名患者。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Jun;50(3):791-798. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02395-6. Epub 2023 Dec 4.
10
Surgical Outcomes and Quality of Care Among Adult Appendicitis Patients: A Comparative Study of Tertiary Care Hospitals and Regional Hospitals.成人阑尾炎患者的手术结果和医疗质量:三级保健医院和区域医院的比较研究。
World J Surg. 2023 Dec;47(12):3149-3158. doi: 10.1007/s00268-023-07219-7. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
时间对急性阑尾炎穿孔风险的影响。
Acta Chir Belg. 2009 Jan-Feb;109(1):75-80. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2009.11680376.
4
Impact of time in the development of acute appendicitis.时间对急性阑尾炎发展的影响。
Dig Surg. 2008;25(5):394-9. doi: 10.1159/000180451. Epub 2008 Dec 9.
5
Negative appendectomy and imaging accuracy in the Washington State Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program.华盛顿州外科护理与结果评估项目中的阴性阑尾切除术及影像诊断准确性
Ann Surg. 2008 Oct;248(4):557-63. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318187aeca.
6
Influence of delays on perforation risk in adults with acute appendicitis.成人急性阑尾炎中延迟对穿孔风险的影响。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Dec;51(12):1823-7. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9373-6. Epub 2008 Jun 27.
7
The natural history and traditional management of appendicitis revisited: spontaneous resolution and predominance of prehospital perforations imply that a correct diagnosis is more important than an early diagnosis.阑尾炎的自然病史与传统治疗方法再探讨:自然缓解与院前穿孔占主导地位意味着正确诊断比早期诊断更为重要。
World J Surg. 2007 Jan;31(1):86-92. doi: 10.1007/s00268-006-0056-y.
8
Is it safe to delay appendectomy in adults with acute appendicitis?成人急性阑尾炎患者延迟阑尾切除术是否安全?
Ann Surg. 2006 Nov;244(5):656-60. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000231726.53487.dd.
9
Effects of delaying appendectomy for acute appendicitis for 12 to 24 hours.将急性阑尾炎阑尾切除术延迟12至24小时的影响。
Arch Surg. 2006 May;141(5):504-6; discussioin 506-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.141.5.504.
10
Delay to appendicectomy and associated morbidity: a retrospective review.阑尾切除术延迟及其相关并发症:一项回顾性研究。
ANZ J Surg. 2006 Mar;76(3):153-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03673.x.