Suppr超能文献

研究人员对脑深部刺激数据共享的看法。

Researcher Perspectives on Data Sharing in Deep Brain Stimulation.

作者信息

Zuk Peter, Sanchez Clarissa E, Kostick Kristin, Torgerson Laura, Muñoz Katrina A, Hsu Rebecca, Kalwani Lavina, Sierra-Mercado Demetrio, Robinson Jill O, Outram Simon, Koenig Barbara A, Pereira Stacey, McGuire Amy L, Lázaro-Muñoz Gabriel

机构信息

Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.

Evans School of Public Policy and Governance, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Dec 17;14:578687. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.578687. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

The expansion of research on deep brain stimulation (DBS) and adaptive DBS (aDBS) raises important neuroethics and policy questions related to data sharing. However, there has been little empirical research on the perspectives of experts developing these technologies. We conducted semi-structured, open-ended interviews with aDBS researchers regarding their data sharing practices and their perspectives on ethical and policy issues related to sharing. Researchers expressed support for and a commitment to sharing, with most saying that they were either sharing their data or would share in the future and that doing so was important for advancing the field. However, those who are sharing reported a variety of sharing partners, suggesting heterogeneity in sharing practices and lack of the broad sharing that would reflect principles of open science. Researchers described several concerns and barriers related to sharing, including privacy and confidentiality, the usability of shared data by others, ownership and control of data (including potential commercialization), and limited resources for sharing. They also suggested potential solutions to these challenges, including additional safeguards to address privacy issues, standardization and transparency in analysis to address issues of data usability, professional norms and heightened cooperation to address issues of ownership and control, and streamlining of data transmission to address resource limitations. Researchers also offered a range of views on the sensitivity of neural activity data (NAD) and data related to mental health in the context of sharing. These findings are an important input to deliberations by researchers, policymakers, neuroethicists, and other stakeholders as they navigate ethics and policy questions related to aDBS research.

摘要

对深部脑刺激(DBS)和适应性深部脑刺激(aDBS)研究的扩展引发了与数据共享相关的重要神经伦理和政策问题。然而,对于开发这些技术的专家的观点,实证研究却很少。我们对aDBS研究人员进行了半结构化的开放式访谈,询问他们的数据共享实践以及他们对与共享相关的伦理和政策问题的看法。研究人员表示支持并承诺进行数据共享,大多数人表示他们要么正在共享数据,要么将来会共享,并且这样做对推动该领域发展很重要。然而,那些正在共享数据的人报告了各种各样的共享伙伴,这表明共享实践存在异质性,缺乏能体现开放科学原则的广泛共享。研究人员描述了与共享相关的几个问题和障碍,包括隐私和保密性、他人对共享数据的可用性、数据的所有权和控制权(包括潜在的商业化)以及共享资源有限。他们还提出了应对这些挑战的潜在解决方案,包括采取额外保障措施来解决隐私问题、在分析中实现标准化和透明度以解决数据可用性问题、通过专业规范和加强合作来解决所有权和控制权问题,以及简化数据传输以解决资源限制问题。研究人员还就共享背景下神经活动数据(NAD)和心理健康相关数据的敏感性提出了一系列观点。这些发现为研究人员、政策制定者、神经伦理学家和其他利益相关者在探讨与aDBS研究相关的伦理和政策问题时的审议提供了重要参考。

相似文献

1
Researcher Perspectives on Data Sharing in Deep Brain Stimulation.研究人员对脑深部刺激数据共享的看法。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Dec 17;14:578687. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.578687. eCollection 2020.
5
Neuroethics of Neuromodulation: An Update.神经调节的神经伦理学:最新进展
Curr Opin Biomed Eng. 2018 Dec;8:45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cobme.2018.10.003. Epub 2018 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

5
Post-trial access to implantable neural devices: an exploratory international survey.植入式神经装置的试验后获取:一项探索性国际调查。
BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2024 Apr 17;6(1):e000262. doi: 10.1136/bmjsit-2024-000262. eCollection 2024.
10
Commercialization, Consent, and the Neural Device Industry.商业化、同意与神经设备行业
AJOB Neurosci. 2022 Jan-Mar;13(1):65-67. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2021.2001089.

本文引用的文献

10
Brain modulation and patent law.脑调制与专利法
Nat Biotechnol. 2019 Jan 3;37(1):18-19. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4334.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验