• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

蛋白质家族系统发生的标度性质。

Scaling properties of protein family phylogenies.

机构信息

Instituto de Física Interdisciplinar y Sistemas Complejos, IFISC (CSIC-UIB), Campus Universitat de les Illes Balears, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.

出版信息

BMC Evol Biol. 2011 Jun 6;11:155. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-155.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2148-11-155
PMID:21645345
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3277297/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

One of the classical questions in evolutionary biology is how evolutionary processes are coupled at the gene and species level. With this motivation, we compare the topological properties (mainly the depth scaling, as a characterization of balance) of a large set of protein phylogenies with those of a set of species phylogenies.

RESULTS

The comparative analysis between protein and species phylogenies shows that both sets of phylogenies share a remarkably similar scaling behavior, suggesting the universality of branching rules and of the evolutionary processes that drive biological diversification from gene to species level. In order to explain such generality, we propose a simple model which allows us to estimate the proportion of evolvability/robustness needed to approximate the scaling behavior observed in the phylogenies, highlighting the relevance of the robustness of a biological system (species or protein) in the scaling properties of the phylogenetic trees.

CONCLUSIONS

The invariance of the scaling properties at levels spanning from genes to species suggests that rules that govern the incapability of a biological system to diversify are equally relevant both at the gene and at the species level.

摘要

背景

进化生物学中的一个经典问题是进化过程如何在基因和物种水平上相互关联。受此启发,我们比较了大量蛋白质系统发育树和物种系统发育树的拓扑性质(主要是深度标度,作为平衡的特征)。

结果

蛋白质系统发育树和物种系统发育树之间的比较分析表明,这两组系统发育树具有非常相似的标度行为,表明分支规则和推动从基因到物种水平的生物多样化的进化过程具有普遍性。为了解释这种普遍性,我们提出了一个简单的模型,该模型允许我们估计接近系统发育树中观察到的标度行为所需的可进化性/稳健性的比例,突出了生物系统(物种或蛋白质)的稳健性在系统发育树的标度性质中的重要性。

结论

从基因到物种的各级别标度性质的不变性表明,控制生物系统不能多样化的规则在基因和物种水平上同样重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78fc/3277297/3a4140695633/1471-2148-11-155-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78fc/3277297/8f05ce24303e/1471-2148-11-155-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78fc/3277297/48aa34cf320f/1471-2148-11-155-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78fc/3277297/e79c177c11e1/1471-2148-11-155-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78fc/3277297/7a83b9f921b6/1471-2148-11-155-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78fc/3277297/dcc43afbe576/1471-2148-11-155-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78fc/3277297/3a4140695633/1471-2148-11-155-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78fc/3277297/8f05ce24303e/1471-2148-11-155-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78fc/3277297/48aa34cf320f/1471-2148-11-155-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78fc/3277297/e79c177c11e1/1471-2148-11-155-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78fc/3277297/7a83b9f921b6/1471-2148-11-155-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78fc/3277297/dcc43afbe576/1471-2148-11-155-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78fc/3277297/3a4140695633/1471-2148-11-155-6.jpg

相似文献

1
Scaling properties of protein family phylogenies.蛋白质家族系统发生的标度性质。
BMC Evol Biol. 2011 Jun 6;11:155. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-155.
2
Universal scaling in the branching of the tree of life.生命之树分支中的普遍标度律。
PLoS One. 2008 Jul 23;3(7):e2757. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002757.
3
How Ecology and Landscape Dynamics Shape Phylogenetic Trees.生态与景观动态如何塑造系统发育树。
Syst Biol. 2015 Jul;64(4):590-607. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syv014. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
4
Scale-invariant topology and bursty branching of evolutionary trees emerge from niche construction.尺度不变的拓扑结构和进化树的突发分支源自生态位构建。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Apr 7;117(14):7879-7887. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1915088117. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
5
Inferring the mammal tree: Species-level sets of phylogenies for questions in ecology, evolution, and conservation.推断哺乳动物树:用于生态学、进化和保护问题的物种级系统发育集合。
PLoS Biol. 2019 Dec 4;17(12):e3000494. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000494. eCollection 2019 Dec.
6
Molecular evolution of calcification genes in morphologically similar but phylogenetically unrelated scleractinian corals.形态相似但系统发育上无关的石珊瑚钙化基因的分子进化
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2014 Aug;77:281-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.04.015. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
7
Mega-phylogeny approach for comparative biology: an alternative to supertree and supermatrix approaches.用于比较生物学的巨系统发育方法:超级树和超级矩阵方法的替代方案。
BMC Evol Biol. 2009 Feb 11;9:37. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-9-37.
8
The shape of human gene family phylogenies.人类基因家族系统发育树的形状。
BMC Evol Biol. 2006 Aug 29;6:66. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-6-66.
9
No substitute for real data: A cautionary note on the use of phylogenies from birth-death polytomy resolvers for downstream comparative analyses.真实数据无可替代:关于将出生-死亡多歧解析器的系统发育树用于下游比较分析的警示说明。
Evolution. 2015 Dec;69(12):3207-16. doi: 10.1111/evo.12817.
10
Seeing the forest for the trees: the limitations of phylogenies in comparative biology. (American Society of Naturalists Address).见林忘树:系统发育在比较生物学中的局限。(美国自然主义者协会演讲)
Am Nat. 2011 Jun;177(6):709-27. doi: 10.1086/660020.

引用本文的文献

1
Tree balance in phylogenetic models.系统发育模型中的树形平衡
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 Feb 13;380(1919):20230303. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0303. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
2
Exploring the enzymatic repertoires of Bacteria and Archaea and their associations with metabolic maps.探索细菌和古菌的酶库及其与代谢图谱的关联。
Braz J Microbiol. 2024 Dec;55(4):3147-3157. doi: 10.1007/s42770-024-01462-3. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
3
Structural and Evolutionary Relationships of Melanin Cascade Proteins in Cnidarian Innate Immunity.

本文引用的文献

1
Accounting for Mode of Speciation Increases Power and Realism of Tests of Phylogenetic Asymmetry.考虑物种形成模式可提高系统发育不对称性检验的效能和现实性。
Am Nat. 1999 Mar;153(3):332-346. doi: 10.1086/303173.
2
ADAPTIVE RADIATION AND THE TOPOLOGY OF LARGE PHYLOGENIES.适应性辐射与大型系统发育的拓扑结构
Evolution. 1993 Feb;47(1):253-263. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb01214.x.
3
COMPARISONS OF OBSERVED PHYLOGENETIC TOPOLOGIES WITH NULL EXPECTATIONS AMONG THREE MONOPHYLETIC LINEAGES.三个单系谱系中观察到的系统发育拓扑结构与零期望值的比较。
黑色素级联蛋白在刺胞动物先天免疫中的结构和进化关系。
Integr Comp Biol. 2024 Nov 21;64(5):1320-1337. doi: 10.1093/icb/icae115.
4
The Limits of the Constant-rate Birth-Death Prior for Phylogenetic Tree Topology Inference.《系统发育树拓扑推断中恒定速率 Birth-Death 先验的局限性》。
Syst Biol. 2024 May 27;73(1):235-246. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syad075.
5
Rapid evolution of SARS-CoV-2 challenges human defenses.SARS-CoV-2 的快速进化挑战了人类的防御能力。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 19;12(1):6457. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10097-z.
6
Insight into Evolution and Conservation Patterns of B1-Subfamily Members of GPCR.深入了解GPCR B1亚家族成员的进化与保守模式。
Int J Pept Res Ther. 2020;26(4):2505-2517. doi: 10.1007/s10989-020-10043-5. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
7
Scale-invariant topology and bursty branching of evolutionary trees emerge from niche construction.尺度不变的拓扑结构和进化树的突发分支源自生态位构建。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Apr 7;117(14):7879-7887. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1915088117. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
8
Diminishing return for increased Mappability with longer sequencing reads: implications of the k-mer distributions in the human genome.测序读长增加导致可测性提高的收益递减:人类基因组中 k-mer 分布的意义。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2014 Jan 3;15:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-2.
9
Phylogenetic properties of RNA viruses.RNA 病毒的系统发育特性。
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44849. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044849. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
10
Benefits of using molecular structure and abundance in phylogenomic analysis.在系统发育基因组学分析中使用分子结构和丰度的益处。
Front Genet. 2012 Sep 6;3:172. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2012.00172. eCollection 2012.
Evolution. 1991 Mar;45(2):340-350. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1991.tb04408.x.
4
PATTERNS IN TREE BALANCE AMONG CLADISTIC, PHENETIC, AND RANDOMLY GENERATED PHYLOGENETIC TREES.支序分类、表型分类及随机生成的系统发育树中树平衡的模式。
Evolution. 1992 Dec;46(6):1818-1826. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1992.tb01171.x.
5
SEARCHING FOR EVOLUTIONARY PATTERNS IN THE SHAPE OF A PHYLOGENETIC TREE.探寻系统发育树形状中的进化模式。
Evolution. 1993 Aug;47(4):1171-1181. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb02144.x.
6
Anomalous scaling in an age-dependent branching model.年龄依赖性分支模型中的异常标度
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2015 Feb;91(2):022803. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.91.022803. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
7
Robustness: mechanisms and consequences.稳健性:机制与后果
Trends Genet. 2009 Sep;25(9):395-403. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2009.07.005. Epub 2009 Aug 28.
8
Evolution and evolvability: celebrating Darwin 200.进化与可进化性:纪念达尔文诞辰200周年
Biol Lett. 2009 Feb 23;5(1):44-6. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0639.
9
Universal scaling in the branching of the tree of life.生命之树分支中的普遍标度律。
PLoS One. 2008 Jul 23;3(7):e2757. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002757.
10
Sloppiness, robustness, and evolvability in systems biology.系统生物学中的随意性、稳健性与可进化性。
Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2008 Aug;19(4):389-95. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2008.06.008. Epub 2008 Jul 25.