• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭内的遗传彩票。

Genetic lotteries within families.

机构信息

Yale University, School of Public Health, 60 College Street, #303, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.

出版信息

J Health Econ. 2011 Jul;30(4):647-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.04.005. Epub 2011 May 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.04.005
PMID:21664708
Abstract

Drawing on findings from the biomedical literature, this paper introduces the idea that specific exogenously inherited differences in the genetic code between full biological siblings can be used to test within-family estimators and potentially improve our understanding of economic relationships. These points are illustrated with an application to identify the causal impact of several poor health conditions on academic outcomes. We present evidence that family fixed effects estimators by themselves cannot fully account for the endogeneity of poor health when estimating education production functions. Further, our analysis elucidates the situations under which genetic markers can serve as instrumental variables for specific health conditions.

摘要

本文借鉴生物医学文献中的研究结果,提出了这样一种观点,即在全同胞之间的遗传密码中外源性遗传的特定差异可用于检验家庭内估计量,并有可能增进我们对经济关系的理解。本文通过一个应用案例说明了这一点,该案例旨在确定若干不良健康状况对学业成绩的因果影响。我们的研究结果表明,在估计教育生产函数时,仅使用家庭固定效应估计量并不能完全说明不良健康状况的内生性。此外,我们的分析还阐明了在何种情况下遗传标记可以作为特定健康状况的工具变量。

相似文献

1
Genetic lotteries within families.家庭内的遗传彩票。
J Health Econ. 2011 Jul;30(4):647-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.04.005. Epub 2011 May 17.
2
The impact of poor health on academic performance: New evidence using genetic markers.健康状况不佳对学业成绩的影响:使用基因标记的新证据。
J Health Econ. 2009 May;28(3):578-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.11.006. Epub 2008 Dec 25.
3
The evolution of health outcomes from childhood to adolescence.从儿童期到青春期健康结果的演变。
J Health Econ. 2011 Jan;30(1):11-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2010.10.007. Epub 2010 Nov 5.
4
Long-term effects of health investments and parental favoritism: the case of breastfeeding.健康投资和父母偏爱对儿童的长期影响:以母乳喂养为例。
Health Econ. 2011 Nov;20(11):1349-61. doi: 10.1002/hec.1675. Epub 2010 Oct 18.
5
The health status of southern children: a neglected regional disparity.南方儿童的健康状况:一个被忽视的地区差异。
Pediatrics. 2005 Dec;116(6):e746-53. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0366. Epub 2005 Nov 1.
6
Adolescent depression and educational attainment: results using sibling fixed effects.青少年抑郁与受教育程度:使用同胞固定效应的研究结果
Health Econ. 2010 Jul;19(7):855-71. doi: 10.1002/hec.1526.
7
Drugs and juvenile crime: evidence from a panel of siblings and twins.毒品与青少年犯罪:来自一组兄弟姐妹和双胞胎的证据
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res. 2005;16:91-120.
8
The impact of mental health on labour market outcomes in China.心理健康对中国劳动力市场结果的影响。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2009 Sep;12(3):157-66.
9
Using sibling differences to estimate effects of parenting on adolescent sexual risk behaviors.利用兄弟姐妹间的差异来估计养育方式对青少年性风险行为的影响。
J Adolesc Health. 2008 Aug;43(2):133-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.12.012. Epub 2008 Apr 25.
10
Illicit drug use and educational attainment.非法药物使用与教育程度。
Health Econ. 2006 May;15(5):489-511. doi: 10.1002/hec.1085.

引用本文的文献

1
Neighborhood context, genetic influences, and life satisfaction: Evidence from the German twin family panel.邻里环境、基因影响与生活满意度:来自德国双胞胎家庭面板的证据。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 25;20(8):e0316416. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316416. eCollection 2025.
2
Using the phenotype differences model to identify genetic effects in samples of partially genotyped sibling pairs.利用表型差异模型在部分基因型同胞对样本中识别遗传效应。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Dec 3;121(49):e2405725121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2405725121. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
3
Analysis of admixed Greenlandic siblings shows that the mean genotypic values for metabolic phenotypes differ between Inuit and Europeans.
分析格陵兰混合同胞表明,代谢表型的平均基因型值在因纽特人和欧洲人之间存在差异。
Genome Med. 2024 May 23;16(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s13073-024-01326-3.
4
Interpreting polygenic score effects in sibling analysis.在同胞分析中解释多基因评分效应。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 15;19(2):e0282212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282212. eCollection 2024.
5
Re-examining the relationship between education and adult mental health in the UK: A research note.重新审视英国教育与成人心理健康之间的关系:一篇研究笔记。
Econ Educ Rev. 2023 Apr;93. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2023.102354. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
6
Health Economic Aspects of Childhood Excess Weight: A Structured Review.儿童超重的健康经济问题:一项结构化综述。
Children (Basel). 2022 Mar 24;9(4):461. doi: 10.3390/children9040461.
7
Genetic risks, adolescent health, and schooling attainment.遗传风险、青少年健康与受教育程度
Health Econ. 2021 Nov;30(11):2905-2920. doi: 10.1002/hec.4421. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
8
Evaluating the Continued Integration of Genetics into Medical Sociology.评估遗传学在医学社会学中的持续融入。
J Health Soc Behav. 2021 Sep;62(3):404-418. doi: 10.1177/00221465211032581. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
9
Twins and Causal Inference: Leveraging Nature's Experiment.双胞胎与因果推断:利用自然实验
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2021 Jun 1;11(6):a039552. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a039552.
10
Empirical comparisons of multiple Mendelian randomization approaches in the presence of assortative mating.存在同型婚配时,多种孟德尔随机化方法的实证比较。
Int J Epidemiol. 2020 Aug 1;49(4):1185-1193. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa013.