Suppr超能文献

从青少年晚期到成年早期执行功能能力的稳定性与变化:一项纵向双生子研究。

Stability and change in executive function abilities from late adolescence to early adulthood: A longitudinal twin study.

作者信息

Friedman Naomi P, Miyake Akira, Altamirano Lee J, Corley Robin P, Young Susan E, Rhea Sally Ann, Hewitt John K

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder.

Institute for Behavioral Genetics, University of Colorado Boulder.

出版信息

Dev Psychol. 2016 Feb;52(2):326-40. doi: 10.1037/dev0000075.

Abstract

Executive functions (EFs)-the higher level cognitive abilities that enable us to control our own thoughts and actions-continue to develop into early adulthood, yet no longitudinal study has examined their stability during the important life transition from late adolescence to young adulthood. In this twin study (total N = 840 individuals from 424 families), we examined the stability of individual differences in 3 EF components across a 6-year period, from approximately age 17 years (Wave 1) to 23 years (Wave 2). Specifically, we address the following questions: (a) How stable are individual differences in multiple EFs across this time period? and (b) What (genetic and/or environmental) influences affect stability and change in EFs? Results indicated that individual differences in EFs are quite stable across this 6-year period (phenotypic latent variable correlations ranged from 0.86 to 1.0). However, there was evidence for change, particularly in the factor common to multiple EFs (Common EF). Multivariate twin models suggested that stability was due almost entirely to high genetic correlations across time; there was no new genetic variance at Wave 2. Change in Common EF was due to small but significant nonshared environmental influences at Wave 2 (15%). The results suggest that individual differences in EFs are quite heritable and stable by late adolescence, yet are still sensitive to environmental influences.

摘要

执行功能(EFs)——使我们能够控制自己的思维和行动的高级认知能力——在成年早期仍在持续发展,但尚无纵向研究考察其在从青少年晚期到青年期这一重要人生过渡阶段的稳定性。在这项双胞胎研究中(共840人,来自424个家庭),我们考察了6年期间(从大约17岁[第1波]到23岁[第2波])3个执行功能成分个体差异的稳定性。具体而言,我们探讨以下问题:(a)在这段时间内,多个执行功能的个体差异有多稳定?以及(b)哪些(遗传和/或环境)影响因素会影响执行功能的稳定性和变化?结果表明,在这6年期间,执行功能的个体差异相当稳定(表型潜变量相关性在0.86至1.0之间)。然而,有证据表明存在变化,尤其是在多个执行功能共有的因素(共同执行功能)方面。多变量双胞胎模型表明,稳定性几乎完全归因于不同时间点之间高度的遗传相关性;在第2波时没有新的遗传方差。共同执行功能的变化归因于第2波时较小但显著的非共享环境影响(15%)。结果表明,执行功能的个体差异在青少年晚期相当具有遗传性且稳定,但仍对环境影响敏感。

相似文献

2
Executive functions and substance use: Relations in late adolescence and early adulthood.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2017 Feb;126(2):257-270. doi: 10.1037/abn0000250. Epub 2017 Jan 2.
4
Genetic and environmental architecture of executive functions in midlife.
Neuropsychology. 2018 Jan;32(1):18-30. doi: 10.1037/neu0000389. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
5
Stability of genetic and environmental influences on executive functions in midlife.
Psychol Aging. 2018 Mar;33(2):219-231. doi: 10.1037/pag0000230.
7
A longitudinal twin study of general cognitive ability over four decades.
Dev Psychol. 2017 Jun;53(6):1170-1177. doi: 10.1037/dev0000303. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
8
Genetic and environmental influences on affiliation with deviant peers during adolescence and early adulthood.
Dev Psychol. 2014 Mar;50(3):663-73. doi: 10.1037/a0034345. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
9
Genes Unite Executive Functions in Childhood.
Psychol Sci. 2015 Aug;26(8):1151-63. doi: 10.1177/0956797615577209. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
10
Changes in genetic and environmental influences on trait anxiety ćfrom middle adolescence to early adulthood.
J Affect Disord. 2013 Oct;151(1):46-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.05.046. Epub 2013 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Neurocognitive Biotypes of Risk and Resilience for Mood Disorders in Adolescents: Insights From Behavioral and Graph-Theoretic Network Markers.
Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2025 Jul 8;5(6):100563. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2025.100563. eCollection 2025 Nov.
3
Efficiency of structural brain networks mediates age-associated differences in executive functioning in older adults.
Front Aging Neurosci. 2025 Jul 8;17:1593868. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1593868. eCollection 2025.
8
Frequency-specific modulations for subcomponents of executive functions in the infra-slow frequency range -A combined O-tDCS and fNIRS study.
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2025 Apr-Jun;25(2):100575. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2025.100575. Epub 2025 May 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Genes Unite Executive Functions in Childhood.
Psychol Sci. 2015 Aug;26(8):1151-63. doi: 10.1177/0956797615577209. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
2
GWAS for executive function and processing speed suggests involvement of the CADM2 gene.
Mol Psychiatry. 2016 Feb;21(2):189-197. doi: 10.1038/mp.2015.37. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
4
Toward a comprehensive understanding of executive cognitive function in implicit racial bias.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Feb;108(2):187-218. doi: 10.1037/a0038557.
5
A neural network model of individual differences in task switching abilities.
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Sep;62:375-89. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.04.014. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
7
Colorado Twin Registry: an update.
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2013 Feb;16(1):351-7. doi: 10.1017/thg.2012.93. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
8
The Nature and Organization of Individual Differences in Executive Functions: Four General Conclusions.
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2012 Feb;21(1):8-14. doi: 10.1177/0963721411429458.
9
Genetic contributions to stability and change in intelligence from childhood to old age.
Nature. 2012 Jan 18;482(7384):212-5. doi: 10.1038/nature10781.
10
A unified framework for inhibitory control.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Oct;15(10):453-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.07.011. Epub 2011 Aug 31.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验