• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响心肌梗死后患者参与基因研究意愿的因素。

Factors influencing patient willingness to participate in genetic research after a myocardial infarction.

机构信息

Henry Ford Hospital, Heart and Vascular Institute, Detroit, Michigan, 48202, USA.

出版信息

Genome Med. 2011 Jun 15;3(6):39. doi: 10.1186/gm255.

DOI:10.1186/gm255
PMID:21676259
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3218813/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Achieving 'personalized medicine' requires enrolling representative cohorts into genetic studies, but patient self-selection may introduce bias. We sought to identify characteristics associated with genetic consent in a myocardial infarction (MI) registry.

METHODS

We assessed correlates of participation in the genetic sub-study of TRIUMPH, a prospective MI registry (n = 4,340) from 24 US hospitals between April 2005 and December 2008. Factors examined included extensive socio-demographics factors, clinical variables, and study site. Predictors of consent were identified using hierarchical modified Poisson regression, adjusting for study site. Variation in consent rates across hospitals were quantified by the median rate ratio (MRR).

RESULTS

Most subjects consented to donation of their genetic material (n = 3,484; 80%). Participation rates varied greatly between sites, from 40% to 100%. After adjustment for confounding factors, the MRR for hospital was 1.22 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11 to 1.29). The only patient-level factors associated with consent were race (RR 0.93 for African Americans versus whites, 95% CI 0.88 to 0.99) and body mass index (RR 1.03 for BMI ≥ 25, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.06).

CONCLUSION

Among patients with an MI there were notable differences in genetic consent by study site, but little association with patient-level factors. This suggests that variation in the way information is presented during recruitment, or other site factors, strongly influence patients' decision to participate in genetic studies.

摘要

背景

实现“个性化医疗”需要将有代表性的队列纳入遗传研究,但患者的自我选择可能会引入偏差。我们试图确定与心肌梗死(MI)注册研究中的遗传同意相关的特征。

方法

我们评估了 2005 年 4 月至 2008 年 12 月期间,来自美国 24 家医院的 TRIUMPH 前瞻性 MI 注册研究(n = 4340)中遗传子研究的参与者的相关性。检查的因素包括广泛的社会人口统计学因素、临床变量和研究地点。使用分层修正泊松回归来确定同意的预测因素,并调整研究地点。通过中位数率比(MRR)量化医院之间同意率的差异。

结果

大多数受试者同意捐赠他们的遗传物质(n = 3484;80%)。参与率在各医院之间差异很大,从 40%到 100%。在调整混杂因素后,医院的 MRR 为 1.22(95%置信区间(CI)1.11 至 1.29)。与同意相关的唯一患者层面因素是种族(非裔美国人的 RR 为 0.93,白人的 RR 为 0.93,95%CI 为 0.88 至 0.99)和体重指数(RR 为 1.03,BMI≥25 的 RR 为 1.03,95%CI 为 1.01 至 1.06)。

结论

在 MI 患者中,研究地点之间在遗传同意方面存在显著差异,但与患者层面的因素关联不大。这表明,在招募过程中信息呈现方式的差异或其他地点因素强烈影响患者参与遗传研究的决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a8c/3218813/c4ca70fe35cc/gm255-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a8c/3218813/9d05675ecec2/gm255-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a8c/3218813/c4ca70fe35cc/gm255-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a8c/3218813/9d05675ecec2/gm255-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a8c/3218813/c4ca70fe35cc/gm255-2.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors influencing patient willingness to participate in genetic research after a myocardial infarction.影响心肌梗死后患者参与基因研究意愿的因素。
Genome Med. 2011 Jun 15;3(6):39. doi: 10.1186/gm255.
2
Variation in recruitment across sites in a consent-based clinical data registry: lessons from the Canadian Stroke Network.基于同意的临床数据登记处各站点招募情况的差异:来自加拿大卒中网络的经验教训。
BMC Med Ethics. 2006 May 23;7:E6. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-7-6.
3
Variation in the incidence of hospital-acquired anemia during hospitalization with acute myocardial infarction (data from 57 US hospitals).在急性心肌梗死住院期间,医院获得性贫血的发病率存在差异(来自 57 家美国医院的数据)。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Apr 1;113(7):1130-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.12.017. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
4
Patient characteristics and participation in a genetic study: a type 2 diabetes cohort.患者特征及参与基因研究:2 型糖尿病队列研究。
J Investig Med. 2014 Jan;62(1):26-32. doi: 10.2310/JIM.0000000000000022.
5
Are patients with longer emergency department wait times less likely to consent to research?患者在急诊部门等待的时间越长,是否越不愿意同意参与研究?
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Apr;19(4):396-401. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01310.x.
6
Characteristics Associated With Recruitment and Re-contact in Mayo Clinic Biobank.Mayo 诊所生物银行的招募和重新联系相关特征。
Front Public Health. 2020 Feb 4;8:9. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00009. eCollection 2020.
7
Participation bias assessment in a community-based study of myocardial infarction, 2002-2005.2002 - 2005年在一项基于社区的心肌梗死研究中的参与偏倚评估
Mayo Clin Proc. 2007 Aug;82(8):933-8. doi: 10.4065/82.8.933.
8
Change in Angina Symptom Status After Acute Myocardial Infarction and Its Association With Readmission Risk: An Analysis of the Translational Research Investigating Underlying Disparities in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients' Health Status (TRIUMPH) Registry.急性心肌梗死后心绞痛症状状态的变化及其与再入院风险的关联:急性心肌梗死患者健康状况潜在差异的转化研究调查(TRIUMPH)注册研究分析
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Jun 13;5(6):e003205. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003205.
9
Incidence, correlates, and outcomes of acute, hospital-acquired anemia in patients with acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死患者急性医院获得性贫血的发病率、相关因素及预后
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010 Jul;3(4):337-46. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.957050. Epub 2010 May 20.
10
Variation in treatment strategy for non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: A multilevel methodological approach.非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死治疗策略的差异:一种多层次方法学方法。
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Apr 1;328:35-39. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.11.059. Epub 2020 Dec 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Participant-reported personal utility of genetic testing for Parkinson's disease and interest in clinical trial participation.参与者报告的帕金森病基因检测的个人效用以及参与临床试验的意愿。
NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2024 Oct 25;10(1):202. doi: 10.1038/s41531-024-00805-z.
2
Factors that influence a patient's decision to engage in genetic research.影响患者参与基因研究决策的因素。
Front Public Health. 2023 May 22;11:865786. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.865786. eCollection 2023.
3
Attitudes and experiences regarding genetic research among persons of African descent.

本文引用的文献

1
Consent for genetic research in the Framingham Heart Study.弗雷明汉心脏研究中的遗传研究同意书。
Am J Med Genet A. 2010 May;152A(5):1250-6. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.33377.
2
Examining the public refusal to consent to DNA biobanking: empirical data from a Swedish population-based study.审视公众拒绝同意 DNA 生物库:一项基于瑞典人群的实证研究数据。
J Med Ethics. 2010 Feb;36(2):93-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.032367.
3
Attitudes toward genetic testing and personalised nutrition in a representative sample of European consumers.欧洲消费者代表性样本对基因检测和个性化营养的态度。
非洲裔人群对基因研究的态度和经历。
J Community Genet. 2020 Jan;11(1):65-72. doi: 10.1007/s12687-019-00422-x. Epub 2019 May 6.
4
A novel genetic marker of decreased inflammation and improved survival after acute myocardial infarction.一种新的遗传标志物,可降低急性心肌梗死后的炎症反应并改善患者生存。
Basic Res Cardiol. 2018 Aug 10;113(5):38. doi: 10.1007/s00395-018-0697-7.
5
Willingness to Participate in Longitudinal Research Among People with Chronic Pain Who Take Medical Cannabis: A Cross-Sectional Survey.使用医用大麻的慢性疼痛患者参与纵向研究的意愿:一项横断面调查。
Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2018 Mar 1;3(1):45-53. doi: 10.1089/can.2017.0051. eCollection 2018.
6
Community Willingness to Participate in a Dengue Study in Aceh Province, Indonesia.印度尼西亚亚齐省社区参与登革热研究的意愿
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 12;11(7):e0159139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159139. eCollection 2016.
7
Collecting Biospecimens From an Internet-Based Prospective Cohort Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (CCFA Partners): A Feasibility Study.从基于互联网的炎症性肠病前瞻性队列研究(CCFA合作伙伴)中收集生物标本:一项可行性研究。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Jan 5;5(1):e3. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5171.
8
Utility of a genetic risk score to predict recurrent cardiovascular events 1 year after an acute coronary syndrome: A pooled analysis of the RISCA, PRAXY, and TRIUMPH cohorts.急性冠状动脉综合征后1年预测心血管事件复发的遗传风险评分的效用:RISCA、PRAXY和TRIUMPH队列的汇总分析。
Atherosclerosis. 2015 Sep;242(1):261-7. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.07.029. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
9
Clinical outcomes associated with proton pump inhibitor use among clopidogrel-treated patients within CYP2C19 genotype groups following acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死后,CYP2C19基因分型组中接受氯吡格雷治疗的患者使用质子泵抑制剂的临床结局。
Pharmacogenomics J. 2015 Feb;15(1):20-5. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2014.28. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
10
Genetic research participation in a young adult community sample.年轻成人社区样本中的基因研究参与情况。
J Community Genet. 2014 Oct;5(4):363-75. doi: 10.1007/s12687-014-0191-3. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
Br J Nutr. 2009 Apr;101(7):982-9. doi: 10.1017/S0007114508055657. Epub 2008 Sep 8.
4
Factors associated with African Americans' enrollment in a national cancer genetics registry.与非裔美国人加入国家癌症基因登记处相关的因素。
Community Genet. 2008;11(4):224-33. doi: 10.1159/000116883. Epub 2008 Apr 14.
5
Participation bias and its impact on the assembly of a genetic specimen repository for a myocardial infarction cohort.参与偏倚及其对心肌梗死队列基因样本库组建的影响。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2007 Oct;82(10):1185-91. doi: 10.4065/82.10.1185.
6
Willingness of ischemic stroke patients to donate DNA for genetic research: a systematic review.缺血性中风患者捐赠DNA用于基因研究的意愿:一项系统评价
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003 Sep-Oct;12(5):228-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2003.09.004.
7
Why do they do it? A pilot study towards understanding participant motivation and experience in a large genetic epidemiological study of endometriosis.他们为什么要这么做?一项旨在了解子宫内膜异位症大型基因流行病学研究中参与者动机和体验的初步研究。
Community Genet. 2007;10(2):61-71. doi: 10.1159/000099083.
8
Public willingness to participate in and public opinions about genetic variation research: a review of the literature.公众参与基因变异研究的意愿及相关公众意见:文献综述
Am J Public Health. 2006 Nov;96(11):1971-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.069286. Epub 2006 Oct 3.
9
Racial and ethnic disparity in participation in DNA collection at the Atlanta site of the National Birth Defects Prevention Study.在国家出生缺陷预防研究的亚特兰大站点,参与DNA采集方面的种族和族裔差异。
Am J Epidemiol. 2006 Oct 15;164(8):805-12. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj264. Epub 2006 Jul 28.
10
Factors associated with enrollment in cancer genetics research.与癌症遗传学研究入组相关的因素。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Jul;15(7):1355-9. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0816.