Suppr超能文献

三种不同院前包裹方法预防低体温的比较——一项人体交叉研究。

Comparison of three different prehospital wrapping methods for preventing hypothermia--a crossover study in humans.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia & Intensive Care, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011 Jun 23;19:41. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-19-41.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accidental hypothermia increases mortality and morbidity in trauma patients. Various methods for insulating and wrapping hypothermic patients are used worldwide. The aim of this study was to compare the thermal insulating effects and comfort of bubble wrap, ambulance blankets / quilts, and Hibler's method, a low-cost method combining a plastic outer layer with an insulating layer.

METHODS

Eight volunteers were dressed in moistened clothing, exposed to a cold and windy environment then wrapped using one of the three different insulation methods in random order on three different days. They were rested quietly on their back for 60 minutes in a cold climatic chamber. Skin temperature, rectal temperature, oxygen consumption were measured, and metabolic heat production was calculated. A questionnaire was used for a subjective evaluation of comfort, thermal sensation, and shivering.

RESULTS

Skin temperature was significantly higher 15 minutes after wrapping using Hibler's method compared with wrapping with ambulance blankets / quilts or bubble wrap. There were no differences in core temperature between the three insulating methods. The subjects reported more shivering, they felt colder, were more uncomfortable, and had an increased heat production when using bubble wrap compared with the other two methods. Hibler's method was the volunteers preferred method for preventing hypothermia. Bubble wrap was the least effective insulating method, and seemed to require significantly higher heat production to compensate for increased heat loss.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that a combination of vapour tight layer and an additional dry insulating layer (Hibler's method) is the most efficient wrapping method to prevent heat loss, as shown by increased skin temperatures, lower metabolic rate and better thermal comfort. This should then be the method of choice when wrapping a wet patient at risk of developing hypothermia in prehospital environments.

摘要

背景

意外低体温会增加创伤患者的死亡率和发病率。世界各地都有各种用于隔离和包裹低体温患者的方法。本研究旨在比较气泡膜、救护车毯/被子和 Hibler 法(一种将外层塑料与隔热层结合的低成本方法)的隔热效果和舒适度。

方法

8 名志愿者穿着浸湿的衣物,在寒冷多风的环境中暴露,然后在 3 天内随机使用 3 种不同的保温方法中的 1 种进行包裹。他们在冷气候室的床上安静地休息 60 分钟。测量皮肤温度、直肠温度、耗氧量,并计算代谢产热量。使用问卷对舒适度、热感觉和颤抖进行主观评估。

结果

使用 Hibler 法包裹 15 分钟后,皮肤温度明显高于使用救护车毯/被子或气泡膜包裹的皮肤温度。三种保温方法的核心温度没有差异。与其他两种方法相比,使用气泡膜时,志愿者报告的颤抖更多,感觉更冷,舒适度更差,产热量增加。Hibler 法是预防低体温的首选方法。气泡膜是最无效的隔热方法,似乎需要更高的产热量来补偿增加的热量损失。

结论

本研究表明,密封层和额外干燥隔热层的组合(Hibler 法)是防止热量损失最有效的包裹方法,这表现为皮肤温度升高、代谢率降低和热舒适度提高。因此,在院前环境中,当包裹有发生低体温风险的湿患者时,应选择这种方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e99/3142217/643ede0ce170/1757-7241-19-41-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验