Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine.
Cogn Sci. 2006 May 6;30(3):1-26. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_69.
We consider human performance on an optimal stopping problem where people are presented with a list of numbers independently chosen from a uniform distribution. People are told how many numbers are in the list, and how they were chosen. People are then shown the numbers one at a time, and are instructed to choose the maximum, subject to the constraint that they must choose a number at the time it is presented, and any choice below the maximum is incorrect. We present empirical evidence that suggests people use threshold-based models to make decisions, choosing the first currently maximal number that exceeds a fixed threshold for that position in the list. We then develop a hierarchical generative account of this model family, and use Bayesian methods to learn about the parameters of the generative process, making inferences about the threshold decision models people use. We discuss the interesting aspects of human performance on the task, including the lack of learning, and the presence of large individual differences, and consider the possibility of extending the modeling framework to account for individual differences. We also use the modeling results to discuss the merits of hierarchical, generative and Bayesian models of cognitive processes more generally.
我们考虑了人类在最优停止问题上的表现,在这个问题中,人们会收到一组独立从均匀分布中选择的数字。人们会被告知列表中有多少数字,以及它们是如何被选择的。然后,人们会一次看到一个数字,并被指示选择最大值,但必须在数字呈现时选择,并且低于最大值的任何选择都是不正确的。我们提供了经验证据,表明人们使用基于阈值的模型做出决策,选择第一个超过列表中该位置固定阈值的当前最大值。然后,我们开发了一个层次生成模型家族的解释,并使用贝叶斯方法来了解生成过程的参数,从而对人们使用的阈值决策模型进行推断。我们讨论了任务中人类表现的有趣方面,包括缺乏学习和存在大的个体差异,并考虑了扩展建模框架以解释个体差异的可能性。我们还使用建模结果来更广泛地讨论认知过程的层次化、生成和贝叶斯模型的优点。