• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于区域标记和形态学操作的 T1 磁共振图像自动脑提取方法。

Automatic brain extraction methods for T1 magnetic resonance images using region labeling and morphological operations.

机构信息

Department of Computer Science and Applications, Gandhigram Rural Institute, Gandhigram, Tamilnadu 624302, India.

出版信息

Comput Biol Med. 2011 Aug;41(8):716-25. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2011.06.008. Epub 2011 Jul 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2011.06.008
PMID:21724183
Abstract

In this work we propose two brain extraction methods (BEM) that solely depend on the brain anatomy and its intensity characteristics. Our methods are simple, unsupervised and knowledge based. Using an adaptive intensity thresholding method on the magnetic resonance images of head scans, a binary image is obtained. The binary image is labeled using the anatomical facts that the scalp is the boundary between head and background, and the skull is the boundary separating brain and scalp. A run length scheme is applied on the labeled image to get a rough brain mask. Morphological operations are then performed to obtain the fine brain on the assumption that brain is the largest connected component (LCC). But the LCC concept failed to work on some slices where brain is composed of more than one connected component. To solve this problem a 3-D approach is introduced in the BEM. Experimental results on 61 sets of T1 scans taken from MRI scan center and neuroimage web services showed that our methods give better results than the popular methods, FSL's Brain Extraction Tool (BET), BrainSuite's Brain Surface Extractor (BSE) gives results comparable to that of Model-based Level Sets (MLS) and works well even where MLS failed. The average Dice similarity index computed using the "Gold standard" and the specificity values are 0.938 and 0.992, respectively, which are higher than that for BET, BSE and MLS. The average processing time by one of our methods is ≈1s/slice, which is smaller than for MLS, which is ≈4s/slice. One of our methods produces the lowest false positive rate of 0.075, which is smaller than that for BSE, BET and MLS. It is independent of imaging orientation and works well for slices with abnormal features like tumor and lesion in which the existing methods fail in certain cases.

摘要

在这项工作中,我们提出了两种仅依赖于大脑解剖结构及其强度特征的脑提取方法(BEM)。我们的方法简单、无监督且基于知识。使用磁共振成像头部扫描的自适应强度阈值方法,获得二进制图像。使用头皮是头部和背景之间的边界以及颅骨是大脑和头皮之间的边界的解剖事实对二进制图像进行标记。应用游程长度方案对标记的图像进行处理,以获得粗略的大脑掩模。然后进行形态操作,假设大脑是最大连通分量(LCC),从而获得精细的大脑。但是,LCC 概念在一些切片上无法工作,其中大脑由多个连通分量组成。为了解决这个问题,在 BEM 中引入了 3-D 方法。从 MRI 扫描中心和神经影像网络服务获得的 61 组 T1 扫描的实验结果表明,我们的方法比流行的方法(FSL 的脑提取工具(BET)、BrainSuite 的脑表面提取器(BSE))的结果更好,与基于模型的水平集(MLS)的结果相当,并且即使在 MLS 失败的情况下也能很好地工作。使用“黄金标准”计算的平均 Dice 相似性指数和特异性值分别为 0.938 和 0.992,高于 BET、BSE 和 MLS。我们的一种方法的平均处理时间约为 1s/slice,小于 MLS 的 4s/slice。我们的一种方法产生的假阳性率最低,为 0.075,小于 BSE、BET 和 MLS 的假阳性率。它独立于成像方向,对于存在异常特征(如肿瘤和病变)的切片效果很好,而现有方法在某些情况下会失败。

相似文献

1
Automatic brain extraction methods for T1 magnetic resonance images using region labeling and morphological operations.基于区域标记和形态学操作的 T1 磁共振图像自动脑提取方法。
Comput Biol Med. 2011 Aug;41(8):716-25. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2011.06.008. Epub 2011 Jul 2.
2
Fully automatic brain extraction algorithm for axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance images.轴向 T2 加权磁共振成像的全自动脑提取算法。
Comput Biol Med. 2010 Oct;40(10):811-22. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2010.08.004. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
3
Skull-stripping magnetic resonance brain images using a model-based level set.使用基于模型的水平集方法进行颅骨剥离的磁共振脑图像
Neuroimage. 2006 Aug 1;32(1):79-92. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.03.019. Epub 2006 May 11.
4
A meta-algorithm for brain extraction in MRI.一种用于磁共振成像(MRI)中脑提取的元算法。
Neuroimage. 2004 Oct;23(2):625-37. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.06.019.
5
Automatic Brain Portion Segmentation From Magnetic Resonance Images of Head Scans Using Gray Scale Transformation and Morphological Operations.使用灰度变换和形态学运算从头部扫描的磁共振图像中自动进行脑部分割
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2015 Jul-Aug;39(4):552-8. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000249.
6
Skull stripping based on region growing for magnetic resonance brain images.基于区域生长的磁共振脑图像颅骨剥离
Neuroimage. 2009 Oct 1;47(4):1394-407. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.047. Epub 2009 Apr 21.
7
Optimizing parameter choice for FSL-Brain Extraction Tool (BET) on 3D T1 images in multiple sclerosis.优化多发性硬化症 3D T1 图像 FSL-Brain Extraction Tool(BET)的参数选择。
Neuroimage. 2012 Jul 16;61(4):1484-94. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.074. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
8
Robust brain extraction across datasets and comparison with publicly available methods.跨数据集的稳健大脑提取与公开方法的比较。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2011 Sep;30(9):1617-34. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2011.2138152.
9
Contour-based brain segmentation method for magnetic resonance imaging human head scans.基于轮廓的磁共振成像人体头部扫描脑部分割方法。
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2013 May-Jun;37(3):353-68. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3182888256.
10
An accurate skull stripping method based on simplex meshes and histogram analysis for magnetic resonance images.基于单纯形网格和直方图分析的磁共振图像精确颅骨剥离方法。
J Neurosci Methods. 2012;206(2):103-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.02.017. Epub 2012 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Multi-Omics Integration Analysis Pinpoint Proteins Influencing Brain Structure and Function: Toward Drug Targets and Neuroimaging Biomarkers for Neuropsychiatric Disorders.多组学整合分析确定影响脑结构和功能的蛋白:为神经精神疾病的药物靶点和神经影像学生物标志物。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Aug 25;25(17):9223. doi: 10.3390/ijms25179223.
2
Weakly Supervised Skull Stripping of Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Brain Tumor Patients.脑肿瘤患者磁共振成像的弱监督颅骨剥离
Front Neuroimaging. 2022 Apr 25;1:832512. doi: 10.3389/fnimg.2022.832512. eCollection 2022.
3
3D Capsule Networks for Brain Image Segmentation.
三维胶囊网络在脑图像分割中的应用。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2023 May;44(5):562-568. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7845. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
4
Comparing 3D, 2.5D, and 2D Approaches to Brain Image Auto-Segmentation.比较3D、2.5D和2D方法在脑图像自动分割中的应用
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Feb 1;10(2):181. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10020181.
5
State-of-the-Art Traditional to the Machine- and Deep-Learning-Based Skull Stripping Techniques, Models, and Algorithms.基于传统方法到机器和深度学习的颅骨剥离技术、模型和算法的最新进展。
J Digit Imaging. 2020 Dec;33(6):1443-1464. doi: 10.1007/s10278-020-00367-5.
6
Quantitative evaluation of robust skull stripping and tumor detection applied to axial MR images.应用于轴向磁共振图像的稳健颅骨剥离和肿瘤检测的定量评估。
Brain Inform. 2016 Mar;3(1):53-61. doi: 10.1007/s40708-016-0033-7. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
7
Methods on Skull Stripping of MRI Head Scan Images-a Review.磁共振成像头部扫描图像的颅骨剥离方法——综述
J Digit Imaging. 2016 Jun;29(3):365-79. doi: 10.1007/s10278-015-9847-8.
8
Web-based tool for visualization of electric field distribution in deep-seated body structures and planning of electroporation-based treatments.用于可视化深部身体结构中电场分布以及基于电穿孔治疗规划的基于网络的工具。
Biomed Eng Online. 2015;14 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S4. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-14-S3-S4. Epub 2015 Aug 27.