University of Kentucky, Educational, School, & Counseling Psychology, 235 Dickey Hall, Lexington 40506-0017, USA.
Psychother Res. 2011 Sep;21(5):608-19. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2011.598580. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
The good-enough level (GEL) model posits that the rate of change in psychotherapy is related to the total dose of therapy. The psychotherapy dose-response literature has typically measured dose as number of sessions attended without considering the number of days or weeks it takes to complete the sessions (session frequency). The current study sought to replicate the GEL model and explore if session frequency moderates the influence that the number of sessions has on the rate of change in psychotherapy. An archived naturalistic data set with a US university counseling center sample (n=1,207), with treatment progress measured using the Outcome Questionnaire-45 (Lambert et al., 1996), was used. Our results are consistent with the GEL model (i.e., clients who attended fewer sessions evidenced faster rates of change), but extended it by showing that the rate of change was also influenced by session frequency (i.e., clients who attended more sessions on average per week demonstrated more rapid improvement). Evidence suggests that clinicians and researchers should give consideration to session frequency, both in their work with clients and how "dose" is operationalized in psychotherapy research.
足够好水平(GEL)模型假设心理治疗的变化率与治疗的总剂量有关。心理治疗剂量反应文献通常将剂量测量为参加的疗程次数,而不考虑完成疗程所需的天数或周数(疗程频率)。本研究旨在复制 GEL 模型,并探讨疗程频率是否会调节疗程数量对心理治疗变化率的影响。使用了一个来自美国大学咨询中心样本的存档自然主义数据集(n=1,207),使用《Outcome Questionnaire-45》(Lambert 等人,1996)来衡量治疗进展。我们的结果与 GEL 模型一致(即,参加疗程较少的客户表现出更快的变化率),但通过表明疗程频率也会影响变化率来扩展了该模型(即,平均每周参加更多疗程的客户表现出更快的改善)。有证据表明,临床医生和研究人员应该考虑疗程频率,既要考虑他们与客户的工作,也要考虑在心理治疗研究中如何操作“剂量”。