Institute of Occupational Medicine, Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.
BMC Public Health. 2011 Jul 28;11:600. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-600.
To evaluate whether occupational stress factors (high demands, low control, low social support, strain, and iso-strain) are associated with skin disorders in hospital workers and whether psychological problems, such as anxiety and depression, act as potential mechanisms through which occupational stress factors are associated with skin disorders.
1,744 hospital workers were invited to answer a questionnaire concerning the occurrence of skin disorders and psychosocial factors at work. The abbreviated Italian version of the Demand/Control model (Karasek) was used to assess perceived work strain, while the Goldberg scales were used to assess anxiety and depression. Analyses were adjusted for age, gender, occupation, latex glove use and history of atopy.
Of the participants, 25% reported hand dermatitis in the previous 12 months and 35% had been affected by skin disorders in other parts of the body. High job demands (OR = 1.09 CI95% 1.05-1.14), low social support (OR = 0.90, CI95% 0.87-0.93), high strain (OR = 1.54 CI95% 1.20-1.98) and high iso-strain (1.66 CI95% 1.27-2.19) were all associated with a higher prevalence of reported hand skin disorders. Both depression (OR = 2.50 CI95% 1.99-3.14) and anxiety (OR = 2.29 CI95% 1.81-2.89) were associated with higher risk of hand skin disorders. The same pattern was observed for dermatological complaints in other parts of the body. Only a slight reduction in the association between occupational stress variables and skin disorders was observed after including depression and anxiety in the model.
Job stress plays a significant role in triggering skin disorders among hospital workers and psychological problems do not appear to be the mechanism behind this association. Occupational health education and training should focus on reducing job demands and occupational stress in order to prevent skin problems among hospital workers.
评估职业应激因素(高要求、低控制、低社会支持、紧张和同型紧张)是否与医院工作人员的皮肤疾病有关,以及心理问题(如焦虑和抑郁)是否是职业应激因素与皮肤疾病相关的潜在机制。
邀请 1744 名医院工作人员回答一份关于皮肤疾病和工作中的社会心理因素的问卷。使用缩短的意大利版需求/控制模型(Karasek)评估感知工作压力,而使用 Goldberg 量表评估焦虑和抑郁。分析调整了年龄、性别、职业、乳胶手套使用和特应性史。
在参与者中,25%报告在过去 12 个月中患有手部皮炎,35%曾患有身体其他部位的皮肤疾病。高工作要求(OR=1.09,95%CI95%1.05-1.14)、低社会支持(OR=0.90,95%CI95%0.87-0.93)、高紧张(OR=1.54,95%CI95%1.20-1.98)和高同型紧张(OR=1.66,95%CI95%1.27-2.19)均与报告的手部皮肤疾病患病率升高相关。抑郁(OR=2.50,95%CI95%1.99-3.14)和焦虑(OR=2.29,95%CI95%1.81-2.89)均与手部皮肤疾病的风险增加相关。对于身体其他部位的皮肤病投诉,也观察到相同的模式。在模型中纳入抑郁和焦虑后,职业应激变量与皮肤疾病之间的关联略有减弱。
工作压力在引发医院工作人员皮肤疾病方面起着重要作用,而心理问题似乎不是这种关联的机制。职业健康教育培训应侧重于降低工作要求和职业压力,以预防医院工作人员的皮肤问题。