• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

克服谱域光相干断层扫描测量黄斑厚度时的分段错误。

Overcoming segmentation errors in measurements of macular thickness made by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Retina. 2012 Mar;32(3):569-80. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31821f5d69.

DOI:10.1097/IAE.0b013e31821f5d69
PMID:21811209
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the frequency and severity of segmentation errors in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, and present an appropriate scan protocol for measuring macular thickness.

METHODS

In this study we examined 40 eyes of healthy subjects, 45 eyes with retinal pathology and 31 eyes with subretinal pathology. Patients were prospectively imaged using 12 radial scans and 3-dimensional macular cube scans by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (3D OCT-1000; Topcon Corp., Japan) at the same sitting. Retinal segmentation errors were noted and graded using a subjective, categoric error scale to generate an error score. We compared the macular thickness measurements with and without error correction, and between the two scan protocols.

RESULTS

In this series, 63.8% of eyes (74 of 116 eyes) gave at least 1 segmentation error. Errors were more common in eyes with pathology. There was a significant difference between measurements of macular thickness with and without correcting these errors, regardless of scan protocol (P < 0.05). After error correction of both scan protocols, the macular thickness measurements obtained with the 12 radial scan protocol were equivalent to those obtained with the 3-dimensional macular cube scan protocol.

CONCLUSION

Segmentation errors were frequent on scans obtained by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. We recommend the 12 radial scan protocol with error correction as the standard protocol for measuring macular thickness, particularly in clinical studies.

摘要

目的

评估谱域光学相干断层扫描中的分段错误频率和严重程度,并提出一种用于测量黄斑厚度的适当扫描方案。

方法

本研究共检查了 40 只健康眼、45 只视网膜病变眼和 31 只视网膜下病变眼。患者前瞻性地使用 12 条径向扫描和 3 维黄斑立方体扫描(3D OCT-1000;日本 Topcon 公司)在同一次就诊中进行成像。使用主观的分类错误量表记录和分级视网膜分段错误,以生成错误评分。我们比较了有和没有错误校正的黄斑厚度测量值,并比较了两种扫描方案之间的差异。

结果

在该系列中,63.8%的眼(116 眼中的 74 眼)出现至少 1 次分段错误。在有病变的眼中,错误更为常见。无论扫描方案如何,有和没有校正这些错误的黄斑厚度测量值之间均存在显著差异(P<0.05)。校正两种扫描方案的错误后,12 条径向扫描方案获得的黄斑厚度测量值与 3 维黄斑立方体扫描方案获得的测量值相当。

结论

谱域光学相干断层扫描获得的扫描中经常出现分段错误。我们建议使用带有错误校正的 12 条径向扫描方案作为测量黄斑厚度的标准方案,特别是在临床研究中。

相似文献

1
Overcoming segmentation errors in measurements of macular thickness made by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.克服谱域光相干断层扫描测量黄斑厚度时的分段错误。
Retina. 2012 Mar;32(3):569-80. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31821f5d69.
2
Comparing retinal thickness measurements using automated fast macular thickness map versus six-radial line scans with manual measurements.比较使用自动快速黄斑厚度图与六径向线扫描及手动测量的视网膜厚度测量结果。
Ophthalmology. 2009 May;116(5):964-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.12.033.
3
Segmentation error in Stratus optical coherence tomography for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.用于新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性的Stratus光学相干断层扫描中的分割误差。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Jan;50(1):399-404. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-1697. Epub 2008 Aug 1.
4
Artifacts in automatic retinal segmentation using different optical coherence tomography instruments.不同光学相干断层扫描仪在自动视网膜分割中的伪影。
Retina. 2010 Apr;30(4):607-16. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181c2e09d.
5
Errors in retinal thickness measurements obtained by optical coherence tomography.光学相干断层扫描获得的视网膜厚度测量误差。
Ophthalmology. 2006 Feb;113(2):285-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.10.005. Epub 2006 Jan 10.
6
Comparison of retinal thickness measurements between three-dimensional and radial scans on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.光谱域光学相干断层扫描中三维扫描与径向扫描之间视网膜厚度测量的比较。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Sep;148(3):431-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.04.008. Epub 2009 Jun 3.
7
Comparison of spectral-domain versus time-domain optical coherence tomography in management of age-related macular degeneration with ranibizumab.频域与时域光学相干断层扫描在雷珠单抗治疗年龄相关性黄斑变性中的比较
Ophthalmology. 2009 May;116(5):947-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.11.002. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
8
Choroidal thickness and volume mapping by a six radial scan protocol on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.应用谱域光学相干断层扫描的 6 条径向扫描探测法对脉络膜厚度和容积进行测绘。
Ophthalmology. 2012 May;119(5):1017-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.10.029. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
9
Optical coherence tomography errors in glaucoma.青光眼的光学相干断层扫描误差。
J Glaucoma. 2010 Apr-May;19(4):237-42. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181b21f99.
10
Comparison of macular thickness measurement and segmentation error rate between stratus and fourier-domain optical coherence tomography.Stratus与傅里叶域光学相干断层扫描技术在黄斑厚度测量及分割错误率方面的比较
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2010 May-Jun;41(3):301-10. doi: 10.3928/15428877-20100430-02.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of manual correction over automated segmentation of spectral domain optical coherence tomography.手动校正对光谱域光学相干断层扫描自动分割的影响。
Int J Retina Vitreous. 2020 Feb 14;6:4. doi: 10.1186/s40942-020-0207-6. eCollection 2020.
2
Performance of Topcon 3D optical coherence tomography-2000 in re-analyzing OCT-1000 raw data.拓普康3D光学相干断层扫描-2000在重新分析光学相干断层扫描-1000原始数据中的性能。
Exp Ther Med. 2019 Jun;17(6):4395-4402. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.7483. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
3
An evidence-based approach to the routine use of optical coherence tomography.
光学相干断层扫描常规应用的循证方法。
Clin Exp Optom. 2019 May;102(3):242-259. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12847. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
4
Segmentation errors in macular ganglion cell analysis as determined by optical coherence tomography in eyes with macular pathology.在患有黄斑病变的眼睛中,通过光学相干断层扫描确定的黄斑神经节细胞分析中的分割误差。
Int J Retina Vitreous. 2017 Jul 17;3:25. doi: 10.1186/s40942-017-0078-7. eCollection 2017.
5
Impact of eye-tracking technology on OCT-angiography imaging quality in age-related macular degeneration.眼动追踪技术对年龄相关性黄斑变性患者光学相干断层扫描血管造影成像质量的影响
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug;255(8):1535-1542. doi: 10.1007/s00417-017-3684-z. Epub 2017 May 4.
6
Use of Mechanical Turk as a MapReduce Framework for Macular OCT Segmentation.使用亚马逊土耳其机器人众包平台作为用于黄斑OCT分割的MapReduce框架。
J Ophthalmol. 2016;2016:6571547. doi: 10.1155/2016/6571547. Epub 2016 May 11.
7
Outer Retinal Structural Alternation and Segmentation Errors in Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging in Patients With a History of Retinopathy of Prematurity.早产儿视网膜病变病史患者光学相干断层扫描成像中的外层视网膜结构改变及分割误差
Am J Ophthalmol. 2016 Jun;166:169-180. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.03.030. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
8
Detecting signs of retinal leakage in exudative AMD using Cirrus OCT versus SL SCAN-1, a novel integrated FD-OCT into a common slit lamp.使用Cirrus OCT与SL SCAN-1(一种集成在普通裂隙灯中的新型频域光学相干断层扫描技术)检测渗出性年龄相关性黄斑变性中的视网膜渗漏迹象。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan;254(1):37-41. doi: 10.1007/s00417-015-2997-z. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
9
The effect of incorrect scanning distance on boundary detection errors and macular thickness measurements by spectral domain optical coherence tomography: a cross sectional study.不正确的扫描距离对光谱域光学相干断层扫描边界检测误差和黄斑厚度测量的影响:一项横断面研究。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2014 Nov 27;14:148. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-14-148.
10
Assessment of OCT measurements as prognostic factors in myopic macular hole surgery without foveoschisis.评估 OCT 测量在无 foveoschisis 的近视黄斑孔手术中的预后因素。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Nov;251(11):2521-7. doi: 10.1007/s00417-013-2347-y. Epub 2013 May 22.