• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四种根管封闭剂的体外细胞毒性和抗菌效果分析。

In vitro analysis of the cytotoxicity and the antimicrobial effect of four endodontic sealers.

机构信息

Department of Operative Dentistry, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany.

出版信息

Head Face Med. 2011 Aug 10;7:15. doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-7-15.

DOI:10.1186/1746-160X-7-15
PMID:21831282
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3164599/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to investigate in vitro the cytotoxicity and antibacterial properties of four different endodontic sealers using human periodontal ligament fibroblast cell proliferation and visual analysis of growth inhibition.

METHODS

A silicone (GuttaFlow), silicate (EndoSequence BC), zinc oxide eugenol (Pulp Canal Sealer EWT) and epoxy resin (AH Plus Jet) based sealer were incubated with PDL fibroblasts (10⁴ cells/ml, n=6) up to 96 h. Cell proliferation (RFU) was determined by means of the Alamar Blue assay. Cell growth and morphology was visualized by means of fluorescent dyes. Possible antibacterial properties of the different sealers were visualized by means of SEM (Enterococcus faecalis; Parvimonas micra).

RESULTS

Fibroblast proliferation depended on sealer and cultivation time. After 72 and 96 h GuttaFlow and EndoSequence BC showed relatively non-cytotoxic reactions, while Pulp Canal Sealer EWT and AH Plus Jet caused a significant decrease of cell proliferation (p<0.001). Visualization of cell growth and morphology with various fluorescent dyes supplemented the results. No antibacterial effect of EndoSequence BC to P. micra was found, whereas GuttaFlow showed a weak, Pulp Canal Sealer EWT and AH Plus Jet extensive growth inhibition. Also, no antibacterial effect of GuttaFlow, EndoSequence BC or AH Plus Jet to E. faecalis could be detected.

CONCLUSIONS

These in vitro findings reveal that GuttaFlow and EndoSequence BC can be considered as biocompatible sealing materials. However, prior to their clinical employment, studies regarding their sealing properties also need to be considered.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在通过观察人牙周膜成纤维细胞生长抑制的视觉分析和增殖情况,体外研究 4 种不同根管封闭剂的细胞毒性和抗菌性能。

方法

将一种硅胶(GuttaFlow)、硅酸盐水基(EndoSequence BC)、氧化锌丁香酚(Pulp Canal Sealer EWT)和环氧树脂(AH Plus Jet)基封闭剂与牙周膜成纤维细胞(10⁴个细胞/ml,n=6)孵育长达 96 小时。采用 Alamar Blue 测定法测定细胞增殖(相对荧光单位,RFU)。通过荧光染料观察细胞生长和形态。通过扫描电子显微镜(Enterococcus faecalis;Parvimonas micra)观察不同封闭剂的可能抗菌性能。

结果

成纤维细胞的增殖取决于封闭剂和培养时间。GuttaFlow 和 EndoSequence BC 在 72 和 96 小时后显示出相对非细胞毒性反应,而 Pulp Canal Sealer EWT 和 AH Plus Jet 则导致细胞增殖显著减少(p<0.001)。使用各种荧光染料观察细胞生长和形态补充了结果。未发现 EndoSequence BC 对 P. micra 有抗菌作用,而 GuttaFlow 显示出较弱的作用,Pulp Canal Sealer EWT 和 AH Plus Jet 则显示出广泛的生长抑制作用。此外,也未检测到 GuttaFlow、EndoSequence BC 或 AH Plus Jet 对 E. faecalis 的抗菌作用。

结论

这些体外研究结果表明,GuttaFlow 和 EndoSequence BC 可被视为生物相容性的封闭材料。然而,在将其临床应用之前,还需要考虑研究其封闭性能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6609/3164599/0379879a843b/1746-160X-7-15-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6609/3164599/d13187449601/1746-160X-7-15-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6609/3164599/352c642b99e0/1746-160X-7-15-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6609/3164599/2352a93c3890/1746-160X-7-15-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6609/3164599/94179e40f3f9/1746-160X-7-15-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6609/3164599/fc089e65bcc5/1746-160X-7-15-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6609/3164599/0379879a843b/1746-160X-7-15-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6609/3164599/d13187449601/1746-160X-7-15-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6609/3164599/352c642b99e0/1746-160X-7-15-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6609/3164599/2352a93c3890/1746-160X-7-15-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6609/3164599/94179e40f3f9/1746-160X-7-15-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6609/3164599/fc089e65bcc5/1746-160X-7-15-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6609/3164599/0379879a843b/1746-160X-7-15-6.jpg

相似文献

1
In vitro analysis of the cytotoxicity and the antimicrobial effect of four endodontic sealers.四种根管封闭剂的体外细胞毒性和抗菌效果分析。
Head Face Med. 2011 Aug 10;7:15. doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-7-15.
2
Dentin extends the antibacterial effect of endodontic sealers against Enterococcus faecalis biofilms.牙本质可增强根管封闭剂对粪肠球菌生物膜的抗菌作用。
J Endod. 2014 Apr;40(4):505-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.042. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
3
A novel GuttaFlow sealer supports cell survival and attachment.一种新型的GuttaFlow封闭剂可支持细胞存活和附着。
J Endod. 2014 Feb;40(2):231-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.08.029. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
4
Cytotoxicity evaluation of Gutta Flow and Endo Sequence BC sealers.Gutta Flow和Endo Sequence BC封闭剂的细胞毒性评估。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 Nov;112(5):657-61. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.03.050. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
5
Evaluation of the biocompatibility of root canal sealers on human periodontal ligament cells ex vivo.评价根管封闭剂对人牙周膜细胞的体外生物相容性。
Odontology. 2019 Jan;107(1):54-63. doi: 10.1007/s10266-018-0380-3. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
6
Cytocompatibility of calcium silicate-based sealers in a three-dimensional cell culture model.基于硅酸钙的封闭剂在三维细胞培养模型中的细胞相容性
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Jun;21(5):1531-1536. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1918-9. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
7
In vitro antibacterial activity of a silicone-based endodontic sealer and two conventional sealers.一种硅基根管封闭剂和两种传统封闭剂的体外抗菌活性
Braz Oral Res. 2016;30. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0018. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
8
Physical properties of 5 root canal sealers.5种根管封闭剂的物理性能
J Endod. 2013 Oct;39(10):1281-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.06.012. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
9
An in vitro Comparison of Antimicrobial Activity of Three Endodontic Sealers with Different Composition.三种不同成分的根管封闭剂抗菌活性的体外比较
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016 Jul 1;17(7):553-6.
10
A comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy and flow properties for Epiphany, Guttaflow and AH-Plus sealer.三种根管封闭剂的抗菌效果和流变性比较评价
Int Endod J. 2011 Apr;44(4):307-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01829.x. Epub 2011 Jan 10.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of AH26, Endoseal and ZOE sealers on Candida albicans and Enterococcus faecalis.AH26、Endoseal和氧化锌丁香油水门汀封闭剂对白色念珠菌和粪肠球菌的影响。
GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2024 Oct 23;19:Doc50. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000505. eCollection 2024.
2
Biochemical properties of novel Carbon nanodot-stabilized silver nanoparticles enriched calcium hydroxide endodontic sealer.新型碳点稳定的银纳米粒子富钙水门汀根管封闭剂的生化特性。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 3;19(7):e0303808. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303808. eCollection 2024.
3
Biological properties versus solubility of endodontic sealers and cements.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of the in vivo antimicrobial effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine used as root canal irrigants: a molecular microbiology study.比较次氯酸钠和洗必泰作为根管冲洗剂的体内抗菌效果:一项分子微生物学研究。
J Endod. 2011 Feb;37(2):143-50. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.11.006.
2
Cytotoxic response of three cell lines exposed in vitro to dental endodontic sealers.三种细胞系体外暴露于牙本质牙髓封闭剂的细胞毒性反应。
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2010 Nov;95(2):380-6. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.31727.
3
In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial effect of three endodontic sealers mixed with amoxicillin.
牙髓封闭剂和粘固剂的生物学特性与溶解性
Biomater Investig Dent. 2024 Jun 4;11:40863. doi: 10.2340/biid.v11.40863. eCollection 2024.
4
Premixed calcium silicate-based root canal sealers have better biological properties than AH Plus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vivo animal studies and laboratory studies.预混硅酸钙基根管封闭剂比AH Plus具有更好的生物学性能:一项对体内动物研究和实验室研究的系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Apr;27(4):345-359. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_24_24. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
5
Influence of bioceramic sealers on dentinal tubule penetration and antimicrobial effectiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.生物陶瓷封闭剂对牙本质小管渗透和抗菌效果的影响:体外研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Odontology. 2024 Jul;112(3):672-699. doi: 10.1007/s10266-024-00904-6. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
6
The solubility, pH value, chemical structure, radiopacity, and cytotoxicity of four different root canal sealers: an in vitro study.四种不同根管封闭剂的溶解度、pH 值、化学结构、射线可透性和细胞毒性:一项体外研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Sep;27(9):5413-5425. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05160-6. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
7
Evaluation of the Antibacterial Activity of EndoSeal MTA, iRoot SP, and AH Plus against Planktonic Bacteria.EndoSeal MTA、iRoot SP和AH Plus对浮游细菌的抗菌活性评估。
Materials (Basel). 2022 Mar 8;15(6):2012. doi: 10.3390/ma15062012.
8
Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Properties of Bioceramic Materials in Endodontics.生物陶瓷材料在牙髓病学中的抗菌和抗生物膜特性
Materials (Basel). 2021 Dec 10;14(24):7594. doi: 10.3390/ma14247594.
9
The Toxicity of Universal Dental Adhesives: An In Vitro Study.通用牙科粘合剂的毒性:一项体外研究。
Polymers (Basel). 2021 Aug 10;13(16):2653. doi: 10.3390/polym13162653.
10
Calcium silicate-based root canal sealers: a literature review.硅酸钙基根管封闭剂:文献综述
Restor Dent Endod. 2020 Jun 9;45(3):e35. doi: 10.5395/rde.2020.45.e35. eCollection 2020 Aug.
体外评价三种牙胶密封剂混合阿莫西林的抗菌效果。
J Endod. 2010 Jul;36(7):1170-3. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.03.033. Epub 2010 May 13.
4
Cytotoxicity evaluation of endosequence root repair material.Endosequence根修复材料的细胞毒性评估。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Mar;109(3):e122-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.11.028.
5
The induction of cytotoxicity, oxidative stress, and genotoxicity by root canal sealers in mammalian cells.根管封闭剂对哺乳动物细胞的细胞毒性、氧化应激及遗传毒性诱导作用
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Dec;108(6):952-60. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.07.015.
6
In vitro antimicrobial activity of Acroseal, Polifil and Epiphany against Enterococcus faecalis.Acroseal、Polifil和Epiphany对粪肠球菌的体外抗菌活性。
Braz Dent J. 2009;20(2):107-11. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402009000200003.
7
Antibacterial activity of endodontic sealers by modified direct contact test against Enterococcus faecalis.通过改良直接接触试验检测根管封闭剂对粪肠球菌的抗菌活性。
J Endod. 2009 Jul;35(7):1051-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.04.022.
8
pH of pus collected from periapical abscesses.从根尖脓肿收集的脓液的pH值。
Int Endod J. 2009 Jun;42(6):534-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01550.x.
9
Clinical implications and microbiology of bacterial persistence after treatment procedures.治疗程序后细菌持续存在的临床意义及微生物学
J Endod. 2008 Nov;34(11):1291-1301.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.07.028. Epub 2008 Sep 17.
10
Five-year follow-up of a root canal filling material in the maxillary sinus: a case report.上颌窦内一种根管充填材料的五年随访:病例报告
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Oct;106(4):e54-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.06.008. Epub 2008 Aug 20.