• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Skewed riskscapes and gentrified inequities: environmental exposure disparities in Seattle, Washington.倾斜的风险景观和权贵化的不平等:华盛顿州西雅图的环境暴露差异。
Am J Public Health. 2011 Dec;101 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S246-54. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300174. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
2
Skewed riskscapes and environmental injustice: a case study of metropolitan St. Louis.倾斜的风险格局与环境不公:以圣路易斯大都市为例
Environ Manage. 2008 Aug;42(2):232-48. doi: 10.1007/s00267-008-9126-2. Epub 2008 May 28.
3
Environmental injustice and sexual minority health disparities: A national study of inequitable health risks from air pollution among same-sex partners.环境不公与性少数群体健康差距:全国范围内研究同性伴侣因空气污染导致的健康风险不平等现象。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Oct;191:38-47. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.08.040. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
4
Temporal trends in air pollution exposure inequality in Massachusetts.马萨诸塞州空气污染暴露不平等的时间趋势。
Environ Res. 2018 Feb;161:76-86. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.10.028. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
5
Adapting the environmental risk transition theory for urban health inequities: An observational study examining complex environmental riskscapes in seven neighborhoods in Global North cities.将环境风险转变理论应用于城市健康不平等:一项观察性研究,检验了全球北方城市七个社区的复杂环境风险景观。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 May;277:113907. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113907. Epub 2021 Apr 3.
6
Urban air pollution and health inequities: a workshop report.城市空气污染与健康不平等:一份研讨会报告。
Environ Health Perspect. 2001 Jun;109 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):357-74.
7
Light pollution inequities in the continental United States: A distributive environmental justice analysis.美国大陆的光污染不公平现象:分配性环境正义分析。
Environ Res. 2020 Oct;189:109959. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109959. Epub 2020 Jul 19.
8
The social distribution of neighborhood-scale air pollution and monitoring protection.
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2009 May;59(5):591-602. doi: 10.3155/1047-3289.59.5.591.
9
Environmental and Socioeconomic Health Inequalities: a Review and an Example of the Industrial Ostrava Region.环境与社会经济健康不平等:以俄斯特拉发工业区为例的综述
Cent Eur J Public Health. 2016 Dec;24 Suppl:S26-S32. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a4535.
10
Personal and ambient exposures to air toxics in Camden, New Jersey.新泽西州卡姆登市个人及周围环境中的空气有毒物质暴露情况。
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2011 Aug(160):3-127; discussion 129-51.

引用本文的文献

1
Rethinking the effects of gentrification on the health of Black communities in the United States: Towards a racialized health framework.重新思考美国中产阶级化对黑人社区健康的影响:迈向种族化健康框架。
J Urban Aff. 2025;47(6):2048-2070. doi: 10.1080/07352166.2023.2268761. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
2
A Shift in Approach to Addressing Public Health Inequities and the Effect of Societal Structural and Systemic Drivers on Social Determinants of Health.应对公共卫生不平等问题的方法转变以及社会结构和系统驱动因素对健康社会决定因素的影响。
Public Health Rep. 2024 Oct 11:333549241283586. doi: 10.1177/00333549241283586.
3
Urban health inequality in shifting environment: systematic review on the impact of gentrification on residents' health.转型环境下的城市健康不平等:关于高档化对居民健康影响的系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 20;11:1154515. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1154515. eCollection 2023.
4
Disparities in greenspace associated with sleep duration among adolescent children in Southern California.南加州青少年儿童中与睡眠时间相关的绿地差异。
Environ Epidemiol. 2023 Aug 1;7(4):e264. doi: 10.1097/EE9.0000000000000264. eCollection 2023 Aug.
5
Toward Environmental Justice in Civic Science: Youth Performance and Experience Measuring Air Pollution Using Moss as a Bio-Indicator in Industrial-Adjacent Neighborhoods.迈向公民科学中的环境正义:利用苔藓作为工业毗邻社区的生物指标来测量空气污染,青年的表现和经验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 5;17(19):7278. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197278.
6
Gentrification: A Priority for Environmental Justice and Health Equity Research.绅士化:环境正义和健康公平研究的优先事项。
Ethn Dis. 2020 Jul 9;30(3):509-512. doi: 10.18865/ed.30.3.509. eCollection 2020 Summer.
7
Defining gentrification for epidemiologic research: A systematic review.为流行病学研究定义绅士化:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2020 May 21;15(5):e0233361. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233361. eCollection 2020.
8
The burden of carcinogenic air toxics among Asian Americans in four US metro areas.美国四个大都市地区亚裔美国人中致癌空气毒物的负担。
Popul Environ. 2019 Mar;40(3):257-282. doi: 10.1007/s11111-018-0308-4. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
9
"Clear action requires clear thinking": A systematic review of gentrification and health research in the United States.“明确的行动需要明确的思考”:美国内城区复兴与健康研究的系统综述。
Health Place. 2019 Sep;59:102173. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102173. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
10
Environmental Justice in Industrially Contaminated Sites. A Review of Scientific Evidence in the WHO European Region.工业污染场地的环境公正。世卫组织欧洲区域科学证据综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 19;16(6):998. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16060998.

本文引用的文献

1
Racial and socioeconomic disparities in residential proximity to polluting industrial facilities: evidence from the Americans' Changing Lives Study.居住在靠近污染性工业设施附近的种族和社会经济差异:来自“美国人生活变迁研究”的证据。
Am J Public Health. 2009 Nov;99 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S649-56. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.131383.
2
Challenges for multilevel health disparities research in a transdisciplinary environment.跨学科环境下多层次健康差异研究面临的挑战。
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2 Suppl):S182-92. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.019.
3
Cumulative cancer risk from air pollution in Houston: disparities in risk burden and social disadvantage.休斯顿空气污染导致的累积癌症风险:风险负担与社会劣势的差异
Environ Sci Technol. 2008 Jun 15;42(12):4312-22. doi: 10.1021/es072042u.
4
Skewed riskscapes and environmental injustice: a case study of metropolitan St. Louis.倾斜的风险格局与环境不公:以圣路易斯大都市为例
Environ Manage. 2008 Aug;42(2):232-48. doi: 10.1007/s00267-008-9126-2. Epub 2008 May 28.
5
Social determinants of health: what, how, why, and now.健康的社会决定因素:是什么、如何、为何以及现状。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2007 Oct;4(4):A85. Epub 2007 Sep 15.
6
The environmental "riskscape" and social inequality: implications for explaining maternal and child health disparities.环境“风险格局”与社会不平等:对解释母婴健康差异的启示
Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Aug;114(8):1150-3. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8930.
7
Health disparities and health equity: concepts and measurement.健康差异与健康公平:概念与衡量
Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27:167-94. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102103.
8
Environmental justice: human health and environmental inequalities.环境正义:人类健康与环境不平等
Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27:103-24. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102124.
9
Scales of environmental justice: combining GIS and spatial analysis for air toxics in West Oakland, California.环境正义的尺度:结合地理信息系统和空间分析研究加利福尼亚州奥克兰西部的空气有毒物质
Health Place. 2006 Dec;12(4):701-14. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2005.09.005. Epub 2005 Dec 1.
10
GIS modeling of air toxics releases from TRI-reporting and non-TRI-reporting facilities: impacts for environmental justice.有毒空气污染物排放的地理信息系统建模:来自有毒物质排放清单报告设施和非有毒物质排放清单报告设施的排放情况及其对环境正义的影响
Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Dec;112(17):1717-24. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7066.

倾斜的风险景观和权贵化的不平等:华盛顿州西雅图的环境暴露差异。

Skewed riskscapes and gentrified inequities: environmental exposure disparities in Seattle, Washington.

机构信息

Institute for Spatial Information and Analysis, Huxley College of the Environment, Western Washington University, Bellingham, Washington 98225, USA.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2011 Dec;101 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S246-54. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300174. Epub 2011 Aug 11.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2011.300174
PMID:21836115
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3222488/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Few studies have considered the sociohistorical intersection of environmental injustice and gentrification; a gap addressed by this case study of Seattle, Washington. This study explored the advantages of integrating air toxic risk screening with gentrification research to enhance proximity and health equity analysis methodologies. It was hypothesized that Seattle's industrial air toxic exposure risk was unevenly dispersed, that gentrification stratified the city's neighborhoods, and that the inequities of both converged.

METHODS

Spatial characterizations of air toxic pollution risk exposures from 1990 to 2007 were combined with longitudinal cluster analysis of census block groups in Seattle, Washington, from 1990 to 2000.

RESULTS

A cluster of air toxic exposure inequality and socioeconomic inequity converged in 1 area of south central Seattle. Minority and working class residents were more concentrated in the same neighborhoods near Seattle's worst industrial pollution risks.

CONCLUSIONS

Not all pollution was distributed equally in a dynamic urban landscape. Using techniques to examine skewed riskscapes and socioeconomic urban geographies provided a foundation for future research on the connections among environmental health hazard sources, socially vulnerable neighborhoods, and health inequity.

摘要

目的

很少有研究考虑环境不公正和 gentrification 的社会历史交集;本研究以华盛顿西雅图为例,弥补了这一空白。本研究探讨了将空气有毒风险筛选与 gentrification 研究相结合,以增强接近度和健康公平性分析方法的优势。假设西雅图的工业空气有毒暴露风险分布不均,gentrification 使城市社区分层,两者的不平等现象趋同。

方法

将 1990 年至 2007 年的空气有毒污染风险暴露的空间特征与 1990 年至 2000 年华盛顿西雅图的人口普查街区组的纵向聚类分析相结合。

结果

在西雅图中南部的一个地区,空气有毒暴露不平等和社会经济不平等的集群趋同。少数族裔和工人阶级居民更集中在西雅图最严重工业污染风险附近的同一社区。

结论

在动态城市景观中,并非所有污染都均匀分布。使用技术来检查倾斜的风险景观和社会经济城市地理为研究环境健康危害源、社会脆弱社区和健康不平等之间的联系奠定了基础。